LOGIN | REGISTER

View Poll Results: Who are you planning on voting for in the 2012 presidential election?

Voters
68. You may not vote on this poll
  • Barack Obama

    25 36.76%
  • Mitt Romney

    5 7.35%
  • Ron Paul

    26 38.24%
  • Michele Bachmann

    1 1.47%
  • Herman Cain

    4 5.88%
  • Newt Gingrich

    1 1.47%
  • Tim Pawlenty

    2 2.94%
  • Rudi Giulliani

    1 1.47%
  • Rick Perry

    0 0%
  • Sarah Palin

    3 4.41%
Page 2 of 22 FirstFirst 123412 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 212
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    in the grace of the most holy FSM
    Posts
    2,819
    why is there no write-in option? i choose bozo the clown. or perhaps a herd of drunk, mentally retarded, cracked-out chimps. the effects would likely be the same.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    near da beach
    Posts
    130
    I wish there was a strong candidate running but no one really stands out. What I don't know is how people could vote for Obama again. He has shown to be a terrible leader and has done nothing good in his presidency except giving the order to kill Bin Laden. The economy sucks and he has had 3 years to make his "change" which he has failed to do. I was hoping he would of done a better job than he has but he has proven to be just another failure.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Jacksonville FL
    Posts
    423
    The fix is in and these parties are the same. Vote independent for real change

    Ahh the third party. Don't ever feel that you are throwing your vote away on a third party candidate. The beauty of the third party is who they change the political landscape. If you continue to let your vote get hijacked by these two equally worthless major parties nothing will ever change ... as in \"if I vote Libertarian Party instead of Republican I waste my vote cuz they won't win anyway and I'll make it easier for those d-bag Democrats to win\". Third parties are the only real sole force for change of political platforms of the big two... if they start losing votes and elections they will change their stand. Example: Late 1800s Reps. & Dems. had become virtually indistinguishable and no longer responded to the needs of the common man. Enter the Populist, Progressive, & Socialist parties garnering large amounts of votes. Never won the Presidency but their polices were adopted by the big two in the form of child labor laws, hourly work weeks, anti monopoly laws; the 16th, 17th, 18th (bad one no booze) and 19th Amendments. Heck Ralph Nader is a perennial third party candidate that has never won jack but has had more of an positive impact on your everyday life than most of these last few d-Bags (speed limits, seat belts, environmental issues). I can go on but you get the point change is possible. Remember Republicans were once a third party too (1850s) when the political landscape was in a deadlock between Whigs and Democrats...

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Monmouth County
    Posts
    35
    Sarah Palin- dumb, uneducated, and heavily armed. Dont vote Palin, Vote Barack Obama.

  5. #15
    they are all puppets anyway. motivated2surf is entirely correct.

  6. #16
    surfings fun cuz you can go surfing and forget about things that arent surfing. unions,lobbyists,big biz, the pc ****s,all that, whatev,scream at the tv and leave the surf stuff out of it.....neither side gives a phyuck about us.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    MD - VA
    Posts
    2,352
    Quote Originally Posted by SurfJdog View Post
    I wish there was a strong candidate running but no one really stands out. What I don't know is how people could vote for Obama again. He has shown to be a terrible leader and has done nothing good in his presidency except giving the order to kill Bin Laden. The economy sucks and he has had 3 years to make his "change" which he has failed to do. I was hoping he would of done a better job than he has but he has proven to be just another failure.
    3 years to repair 8 years of insanity ? How does that compute ?

    Anyone who took office in 2008 would be going through the sam a s s pounding at this time, whether it was Obama or McCain or Paul or JHChrist his own self. In fact, prior to the 2008 election, a group of financial wiz-bangs, including Warren The Man Buffet met with Obama & asked him if he really, really wanted the job - - because whoever won was going to face an unrelenting financial shipwreck & attempted cleanup of unheard-of proportions.

    Obama is intelligent. We don't need some featherhead like Painlin or some reactionary recluse like Paul in there to make things even worse. And, yes, it could get much worse than it has been.

    Obama has made mistakes. The bailouts (begun by W, by the way) were straight up lame politics to generate voter support. The printing of money & buying of our own debt? I wouldn't teach that to a high school kid as to how to manage one's financial house.

    Gut it out, bud. The tide will turn. But the man has to have more time to turn the ship around. This thing takes awhile to slow down & turn it, like an ocean liner.

    Anyways, yah, as several have said: go surfing, it;'s all cool out there....

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    In a state of flux
    Posts
    2,976
    Chris Christie if he jumps in. Yankee....8 years of Bush=7 trillion as compared with 4 trillion in 2 years of Obama. That is unsustainable by any measure.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Salisbury, Md
    Posts
    14
    My vote is for Jon Ashton.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Monmouth County, NJ
    Posts
    544
    Images
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by yankee View Post
    3 years to repair 8 years of insanity ? How does that compute ?

    Anyone who took office in 2008 would be going through the sam a s s pounding at this time, whether it was Obama or McCain or Paul or JHChrist his own self. In fact, prior to the 2008 election, a group of financial wiz-bangs, including Warren The Man Buffet met with Obama & asked him if he really, really wanted the job - - because whoever won was going to face an unrelenting financial shipwreck & attempted cleanup of unheard-of proportions.

    Obama is intelligent. We don't need some featherhead like Painlin or some reactionary recluse like Paul in there to make things even worse. And, yes, it could get much worse than it has been.

    Obama has made mistakes. The bailouts (begun by W, by the way) were straight up lame politics to generate voter support. The printing of money & buying of our own debt? I wouldn't teach that to a high school kid as to how to manage one's financial house.

    Gut it out, bud. The tide will turn. But the man has to have more time to turn the ship around. This thing takes awhile to slow down & turn it, like an ocean liner.

    Anyways, yah, as several have said: go surfing, it;'s all cool out there....

    WOW......put down the kool-aid kiddo!

    Yes things were in rough shape for Obama from the get go..but instead of governing in a way to fix things...he's governing like the idealouge (spelling?) that he is. I think most people realize that. If you believe his plan of large centralized govt is the way to go..then you vote for him. If you feel all warm and fuzzy for voting for "history"..then go ahead vote for him. Unless you're (people in general) a hard core liberal or totally blind as to what is happening in Europe I can't see why anyone would vote for "big govt, power from the top down, nanny state, give me your money, public union shake down" democrats. If you're a committed liberal/democrat you will vote for Obama anyway...good luck with that.