John John. Even kelly tips his hat to him.
All time- Gerry lopez... stay low and go!

John John. Even kelly tips his hat to him.
All time- Gerry lopez... stay low and go!
Lopez and Tom Curren - All time
Machado
Of those listed...
Rob
Kelly
Dane
(An American bias????)
Not listed...
Rasta
Tudor
Clay Marzo
Old School...
LOPEZ
Curren
MR
Buttons
In a class by himself...
Greenough
Of the top 6 I listed from the modern era, only one has been World Champ... 11 times! Just goes to show where style counts, and where it doesn't...
Last edited by LBCrew; Feb 3, 2012 at 05:07 PM.
All time-Shane Dorian. However, I really enjoy watching Craig Anderson surf! He just has a timeless style that I think will get even better with age. He style reminds of a lot of Craig kelly's timeless smoothness and style. Craig's style will forever the best in snowboarding to me.
mOtion732's post pretty much gets to the heart of the deeper discussion that someone mentioned earlier: How do you define "style?" Sounds like he defines it as the characteristics displayed by the successful tour guys.
I, however, would define "style" as looking super smooth, loose, and relaxed while absolutely flying down the line, making it look easy. Also, style is being able to shred almost any type of board in almost any condition. That's why Tudor gets my vote when just considering the modern era.
kielson... I totally see what you're saying. I say there's a difference between skill and style. Skill is more about what you can do... style is how you do it. Skill might mean something like the most massive air, or the most rotations, or the most turns on a wave. Style is more difficult to quantify, because it has more to do with aesthetics. Ironically, I think, you can have skill without style, but you can't have style without skill.
I'd also argue that style has a lot to do with body mechanics... kinesthetics. What I mean is, there's "style" as in an aggressive, powerful style, vs. a more passive, "move with the wave" type style, but that's not the kind of style I mean. I'm talking about the visual aesthetic of someone surfing... the dance, I guess you could say. Some people, simply because of their build, look better than others when riding waves. Maybe some people can't see the difference, but some people can... like looking at a piece of art.
that's how YOU define GOOD style. others may have a totally different outlook on what defines good style.
i'd have to agree with LBCrew in that style isn't what you in terms of maneuvers but how you do it. how you move down the line, pumping like a madman with arms flailing or calm, cool and relaxed or a combination of both, are good examples of defining a style. this will always be preference-based
All time - Tom Curren
Modern day - Joel Tudor, but I really like Al Knost.
i love how Mick has noooooo style at all
Definitely. Everyone's personal definition of style is OK by me. I think it makes the conversation interesting that they don't match up. I don't think your definition is "wrong;" it's just different from mine.
We're also sort of comparing apples to oranges. Guys like Machado, Tudor, or Knost (good call, HurryCane) approach surfing from a completely different angle than some of the more "progressive" style surfers you'll find on the tour. Both styles are fine, but I personally enjoy watching the less "progressive" guys take a nice, smooth line on a wave more than I enjoy watching a handful of huge cutbacks punctuated with a big air.
Lastly, I feel like music has a lot to do with my experience as a viewer of surf films and therefore it also affects my perception of a surfer's "style." Would watching Tudor surf feel the same way if hardcore music was playing behind his sections of a film? I don't know. Obviously music doesn't determine anything, but I think it definitely produces a "mood" that is undeniable.