Page 25 of 127 FirstFirst ... 1523242526273575125 ... LastLast
Results 241 to 250 of 1265
  1. #241
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Monmouth Beach, NJ
    Posts
    3,959
    So "flexible torsion box" does not refer to torsion flex. A little confusing, but ok...

    I think flexing robs speed by wasting energy. Boards need to flex for other reasons, but gaining speed is not one of them.

    Added weight makes sense to me for some of your design goals... greater momentum to drive through sections being a big one. But what you state as a "simple matter of physics" is, in my opinion, based on my design theories, is an oversimplification. I do not overemphasize gravitational potential energy in design theory based on the idea that the wave itself... the movement of water... determines to a large degree what design features will work best. And here I am referring to boards of light weight and relatively small size when compared to yours. Concaves, fins, rail edges, template... all come together for the purpose of managing wave energy and the movement of water up the face of the wave and toward the beach. Gravity is a constant force, and easily dealt with from a design perspective. All the other factors that relate to energy input into the board/wave/rider "system" (for lack of a better term) mean much more to me than you... or so it seems to me at this point in our conversation. And I agree that rider input, aside from weighting and unweighting, is a relatively small component in the equation.

    Where does "lift," in the vernacular of surfboard design, come into play in your designs?

  2. #242
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Science mother****er
    Posts
    3,548
    Quote Originally Posted by LBCrew View Post
    So "flexible torsion box" does not refer to torsion flex. A little confusing, but ok...

    I think flexing robs speed by wasting energy. Boards need to flex for other reasons, but gaining speed is not one of them.

    Added weight makes sense to me for some of your design goals... greater momentum to drive through sections being a big one. But what you state as a "simple matter of physics" is, in my opinion, based on my design theories, is an oversimplification. I do not overemphasize gravitational potential energy in design theory based on the idea that the wave itself... the movement of water... determines to a large degree what design features will work best. And here I am referring to boards of light weight and relatively small size when compared to yours. Concaves, fins, rail edges, template... all come together for the purpose of managing wave energy and the movement of water up the face of the wave and toward the beach. Gravity is a constant force, and easily dealt with from a design perspective. All the other factors that relate to energy input into the board/wave/rider "system" (for lack of a better term) mean much more to me than you... or so it seems to me at this point in our conversation. And I agree that rider input, aside from weighting and unweighting, is a relatively small component in the equation.

    Where does "lift," in the vernacular of surfboard design, come into play in your designs?
    http://www.exo.net/~pauld/activities...ofsurfing.html

    Roy gives gravity too much credit. Hydrodynamic forces are just as important.

  3. #243
    Quote Originally Posted by LBCrew View Post

    I think flexing robs speed by wasting energy. Boards need to flex for other reasons, but gaining speed is not one of them.
    It needs to br done correctly, the main mistake I see is making shortboards flex when it is really the province of long boards which are ridden from a central position. The load positions and fulcrum don't allow it to be effective for shortboards and mals and flex can indeed slow them down.


    Added weight makes sense to me for some of your design goals... greater momentum to drive through sections being a big one. But what you state as a "simple matter of physics" is, in my opinion, based on my design theories, is an oversimplification. I do not overemphasize gravitational potential energy in design theory based on the idea that the wave itself... the movement of water... determines to a large degree what design features will work best. And here I am referring to boards of light weight and relatively small size when compared to yours. Concaves, fins, rail edges, template... all come together for the purpose of managing wave energy and the movement of water up the face of the wave and toward the beach. Gravity is a constant force, and easily dealt with from a design perspective. All the other factors that relate to energy input into the board/wave/rider "system" (for lack of a better term) mean much more to me than you... or so it seems to me at this point in our conversation. And I agree that rider input, aside from weighting and unweighting, is a relatively small component in the equation.

    Of course surfboard shape and hydrodynamic forces are vitally important, I was merely making the simple but often misunderstood point that the wave imparts energy to board and rider by lifting them, this lifting action imparts gravitational potential energy to the board and rider in proportion to their mass.... the wave does more work when lifting heavier objects. Since the vast majority of the energy which drives board and rider is applied through gravity, there is no acceleration disadvantage for a heavier board and rider.

    It's not a matter of gravity OR hydrodynamic forces.



    Where does "lift," in the vernacular of surfboard design, come into play in your designs?
    That's a huge topic, where would you like to start?

    Surfboards use buoyant ( displacement based ) and planing ( dynamic) lift. We go to great lengths to tailor the distribution of both kinds of lift as required. High dynamic lift areas act as fulcrums, this needs to be understood when designing for flex, I haven't seen anyone else ever use this approach, but it is vital.


    http://www.roystuart.biz/2009/10/buo...ning-lift.html

    http://www.roystuart.biz/2013/01/the...-on-video.html

    http://www.roystuart.biz/2010/12/sur...-pressure.html

    http://www.roystuart.biz/2010/12/sur...essure_04.html

  4. #244
    Quote Originally Posted by brewengineer View Post
    http://www.exo.net/~pauld/activities...ofsurfing.html

    Roy gives gravity too much credit. Hydrodynamic forces are just as important.
    That's a ridiculous comment, and much of the information on the site is below par, for example this old chestnut of a myth:

    "You savor the rush of acceleration as tons of moving water push you faster and faster. "

    In reality the wave lifts the surfboard and rider, hydrodynamic forces are required for this to happen ( otherwise the board and rider would not lift, the wave would simply move over them) ... this lifting action imparts gravitational potential energy to board and rider, and it is this energy which moves the board as it is transferred into kinetic energy.

    When up and riding, the wave can directly push board and rider horizontally only when the rider is on the throwing lip, or when being pushed by whitewater.



    .

  5. #245
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Science mother****er
    Posts
    3,548
    Quote Originally Posted by Roy Stuart View Post
    That's a ridiculous comment, and much of the information on the site is below par, for example this old chestnut of a myth:

    "You savor the rush of acceleration as tons of moving water push you faster and faster. "

    In reality the wave lifts the surfboard and rider, hydrodynamic forces are required for this to happen ( otherwise the board and rider would not lift, the wave would simply move over them) ... this lifting action imparts gravitational potential energy to board and rider, and it is this energy which moves the board as it is transferred into kinetic energy.

    When up and riding, the wave can directly push board and rider horizontally only when the rider is on the throwing lip, or when being pushed by whitewater.



    .
    No, actually you have no concept of physics. There are multiple forces from the wave, and the speed of the wave is important for surfing speed.

    http://www.rodndtube.com/surf/info/i...10N3-69-07.pdf

    But I am sure you know more than someone with a PhD in physics.

  6. #246
    In the videos you have posted of you surfing, I can see that you do gain a decent amount of speed and the added weight of the board actually looks like it helps to keep that momentum. Have you ever considered linking up with a surf shop on the east coast and maybe having a board there that people could demo, maybe pay like the cost of a board rental for a day, so that some of us could try it out...'cause i highly doubt any of us can afford one.

    Here is the website for one of the local shops around here, they would probably be more than happy to store and demo your board...http://www.chaunceyssurfshop.com/Tweets.htm
    Last edited by Koki Barrels; Feb 9, 2013 at 09:37 PM.

  7. #247
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Monmouth Beach, NJ
    Posts
    3,959
    Quote Originally Posted by Roy Stuart View Post
    ...the wave lifts the surfboard and rider, hydrodynamic forces are required for this to happen ( otherwise the board and rider would not lift, the wave would simply move over them) ... this lifting action imparts gravitational potential energy to board and rider, and it is this energy which moves the board as it is transferred into kinetic energy.

    I would say, again, that this is an oversimplification. I believe it is correct in the sense that gravity pulls the board and rider down... wave energy pushes the rider up... and the horizontal motion of the board/rider is, in part, is a play between the two. This seems to be particularly true for your boards, which are clearly lifted at certain planing angles, and dropped at others. But I would argue that typical shortboards, with modern fin configurations and bottom contours, are ridden very differently, relying much less on "climb and drop" forces.

    When up and riding, the wave can directly push board and rider horizontally only when the rider is on the throwing lip, or when being pushed by whitewater.
    I disagree with this last statement completely. Typical modern surfboards move fastest on the face of the wave where the water is moving the fastest... and they do so because they are able to tap into that kinetic energy with design features I do not believe are present in your boards... nor should they.

    Roy... I'm convinced now more than ever, based on just your past few posts... that your boards work exactly the way you want them to, at least for now. I think I understand at least some of the principles upon which your designs are focused, and I think you have a solid understanding about how/why they work the way they do. And anyone who wishes to surf the way you do... the way your designs are intended to be ridden... would find your boards a lot of fun. Personally, I'm not interested. My surfing goals... what [I]feels good[I] to me when I'm up and riding... are very different from what I see in your videos.

    Whether your style of surfing... and the performance of your boards... is popular or not matters little to me. What the value of your boards are and who buys them matter even less. (People have spent obscene amounts of money on stranger things than what you have to offer the marketplace.)
    Last edited by LBCrew; Feb 9, 2013 at 10:08 PM.

  8. #248
    Quote Originally Posted by brewengineer View Post

    No, actually you have no concept of physics. There are multiple forces from the wave, and the speed of the wave is important for surfing speed.

    http://www.rodndtube.com/surf/info/i...10N3-69-07.pdf

    But I am sure you know more than someone with a PhD in physics.
    I know Terry quite well, and have read that paper before. There's nothing there regarding the forces which drive board and rider which contradicts what I've said, and in fact the issue is not directly addressed there at all.

    When you refer to the 'speed of the wave' I assume that you are referring to the speed of the wave front towards the shore. Of course this speed affects the speed potential of board and rider, for the simple reason that increasing the speed also increases the rate at which the wave lifts ( all else being equal). This increases the rate at which the board and rider can acquire gravitationalpotential energy, and this allows board and rider to convert the potential energy into kinetic energy at a faster sustainable rate. This leads to greater speed ( again, all else being equal).

    The interaction between the surfboard and the water ( hydrodynamic forces) create necessary lift and allows control of the direction and trim angle of the board (and thus also the fall line as well) all of which is required for the acquiring and conversion of gravitational potential energy into kinetic energy. Hydrodynamic forces are also created via muscular input from the rider, these can be used to propel the board also.

    Please address your comments to the subject matter, without making spurious and illogical ad hominem and 'from authority' arguments. The argument from authority is particularly hopeless when it misinterprets what the information from the source actually implies.. as you have done.

  9. #249
    Quote Originally Posted by LBCrew View Post

    I disagree with this last statement completely. Typical modern surfboards move fastest on the face of the wave where the water is moving the fastest...
    That is true of all surfboards, and it is not only compatible with what i have said so far but is a necessary condition for it.

    The reason why surfboards can move fastest in the part of the wave where the water is moving the fastest is due to the fact that the water lifts board and rider there, in addition the steeper slope allows reduction of wetted surface area.



    and they do so because they are able to tap into that kinetic energy
    That is correct.. and that kinetic energy is primarily a lifting force, which is transferred into gravitational potential energy and back into kinetic energy, this time of board and rider.





    .

  10. #250
    Quote Originally Posted by Koki Barrels View Post

    In the videos you have posted of you surfing, I can see that you do gain a decent amount of speed and the added weight of the board actually looks like it helps to keep that momentum. Have you ever considered linking up with a surf shop on the east coast and maybe having a board there that people could demo, maybe pay like the cost of a board rental for a day, so that some of us could try it out...'cause i highly doubt any of us can afford one.

    Here is the website for one of the local shops around here, they would probably be more than happy to store and demo your board...http://www.chaunceyssurfshop.com/Tweets.htm
    There's a 13 foot 'Ghost' model in San Francisco at present which is bound to make its way to the East Coast, it's a good all round board which isn't as fast as the 12-9 tunnel finned board in the latest video but still has a good turn of speed.

    .