I don't know why you guys are still entertaining the surfboard shaper from Mordor.
Results 431 to 440 of 1265
Feb 14, 2013, 02:28 PM #431
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- garbage state
Last edited by DaMook; Feb 14, 2013 at 02:31 PM.
Feb 14, 2013, 02:50 PM #432
Thanks for putting this up.
I'll say it again, I and a large portion of the SI crowd have a different idea of what performing on a surfboard means. Like I said earlier, you have a go-fast, go-straight board and in your mind that is the epitome of efficiency. That's fine with me.
I think the surfer's idea of performance in this video have more in common with a lot of the SI users. In the video at 1:36 Beano tries a couple times to make a front side turn up the face of the wave. He tries this unsuccessfully then moves back further on the board to try again and still can't do it and finishes out the ride by jumping over the wave at 1:45.
Later, when Jay is on the board he seems to be riding further back on the board as well and getting bumped around pretty violently but still holding on at 3:18 you can see he is trying to trim up to find the high line and at 3:24 attempts a backside turn down the wave and the board proves to be too unstable for him to complete the turn. The later rides show him trying to carve but unable to as the back of the board is too deep in the water.
I know that these guy obviously don't know how to ride this board as you stated earlier. You ride closer to the nose than them. However, this video and their surfing also serve as examples of how the board they're riding, that shares similar design principles to your other boards, is able to catch waves and trim but fails when a carving turn is attempted.
Early on in the Naval Architecture of Planing Hull by Lindsay Lord he writes of the early Japanese and Italian PT boats with 1800 HP that "took ten boat lengths to turn, with speed falling off badly during the turn." We see evidence of this with your videos. These surfers attempted turns and were punished for it, you trim but attempt no turns. We've seen this many times through the videos you've provided.
Again, as I've said earlier, there is a problem with the definition of performance. In my opinion, your definition of performance is riding a wave for as long as possible with minimal movement. My definition of performance would also be riding a wave as long as possible but meanwhile, I try to see the top and bottom of the wave and with a powerful turn in there if possible.... throwing buckets if you will. That's just me and my level of progression right now. If you are at the top of the game for the boards you're making and riding how do you see them progressing? I see people riding modern surfboard doing backflips now. Where is the future performance of your designs going?
Feb 14, 2013, 02:56 PM #433
Another question for your Roy. What type of vehicle do you drive? No ill intent with the question, just wondering if your vehicle is modded out for efficiency too.
Clemson Surf, that was more than Roy deserves in a reply. He is not here to have a 2 way discussion. He is here to force feed us the absolute most ridiculous idea of a surfboard and make us believe it has no weakness in its design.
Which does not take anyone long to see his board falls painfully short.
So... what is the future of Roy's boards? Roy's surfboards have no future other then an interesting blip to dissapear in time. Roy will be the only voice and when his voice is gone so will his boards.
Feb 14, 2013, 03:10 PM #435
Feb 14, 2013, 03:14 PM #436
Still... I believe Roy has a lot of knowledge about design theory, at least as it relates to his designs... more than most. I'm simply trying to understand HOW his boards work, and understand it in a non-judgmental way, because the argument of "good or bad," "better or worse" gets nowhere when you have different design goals. So I do not support his designs... they're not in line with my design goals. I just think it's interesting to see how his various design principals are put together to achieve a desired result... and I believe he's doing just that. It's just not a result I'm after, personally. Whether Roy can do the same, and recognize the benefits of other design principles applied to other design goals, is questionable. But calling modern surfing aimless flapping, and criticizing other shapers and their products, even going so far as to call them goons, does not imply that he has much appreciation for the work and contributions of others. Now go ahead, Roy... tell me how "incorrect" I am. Since my reading comprehension skills need improvement, and I have no idea about the physics of surfing or how the thruster works, I'm sure I've gotten you, and your boards, all wrong.
Last edited by LBCrew; Feb 14, 2013 at 04:10 PM.
Feb 14, 2013, 03:15 PM #437
Feb 14, 2013, 09:36 PM #438Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2013
As I said, all fins create lift when there is an angle of attack.
Saying that the lift of a double foiled fin is 'nothing' compared with a single foiled fin is totally incorrect. The amount of lift produced by a foil depends upon at least 5 factors, and it is thus meaningless and hardly a 'play on words' to state that the lift of a double foiled fin ( which is what you are using as your argument against lift being produced by single fins) is 'nothing compared to single foiled fins'.
Single fins are quite capable of producing more lift than other fin setups, it depends upon many factors: area, foil, aspect ratio, speed, angle of attack, chord ratio etc.
So the bottom line is that I am correct and those who have stated here that single fins cannot create lift at all are wrong... there's some careful back pedalling rearguard action going on, but 100% wrong is still 100% wrong.
Roy I honestly think you have zero clue as what is happening with your surfboard.
Feb 14, 2013, 09:45 PM #440Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2013
ROY'S BOARDS CREATE ZERO LIFT....
Roy,don't buy it? you fly in an airplane with no wings but all the vertical fins you want. I'll fly in a regular airplane with wings.... we'll compare notes at the end....
That is however a different proposition from saying that 'ROY'S SURFBOARDS CREATE ZERO LIFT' ... and it is incorrect in any case since:
1) Many of my boards have far more horizontal lifting fin area than the multi finned boards available on the regular market.
2) Surfboard hulls are the main source of vertical lift.
The problem with all the longboarders we see in Koo Koo Roy's video is that they all seem to be bad at surfing... even the "enforcer" that Roy was talking about.