LOGIN | REGISTER

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 22
  1. #1

    Slater/Parko Drop-in

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OeTcPueEWkU

    Slater is obviously the ultimate competitor, and the rules dictate that this move was well within his "priority" rights. But I think the understood and universally accepted surfing etiquette should carry over to contest priority rules in this situation. When Parko was already driving through a perfect tube like that, the wave should be his regardless of priority. Maybe the rule should apply only at take-off? If he rode that through it would have been the wave of the contest.

    Glad to see Slater win though. The still shot of Parko flipping him off from the shoulder is classic!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Virginia Beach
    Posts
    967
    Images
    2
    yea that still shot is all-time haha.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    WB
    Posts
    86
    Images
    1
    The rules are there for a reason and they both clearly understood them. Parko would have done the same thing had he been in Kelly's position.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    in the grace of the most holy FSM
    Posts
    3,336
    competition is different than regular surfing. there's a LOT that goes on in the water during a heat that would be unacceptable to us every day surfers, esp. in 3 or 4 man heats.
    i have no problem w/ what slater did...as you said, he's an intense competitor & will make use of everything he can to secure the win. parko knows this, which is why it hasn't really been made a big deal of, i think. it's not like the back-paddle mess from the 90's when slater paddled behind shane beschan at huntington to force an interference call. i also don't think slater would've done it if the wave had been a poor one, but it seems fairly obvious that it could've swung the final in parko's favor, so he exercised his priority & dropped in. i don't doubt that fanning or parko would've done the same in that position.

  5. #5
    lol. how can anyone have a problem with this? In a competition, having priority, the heat on the line.... You don't get to be a champion by being nice.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    in the grace of the most holy FSM
    Posts
    3,336
    Quote Originally Posted by MFitz73 View Post
    lol. how can anyone have a problem with this? In a competition, having priority, the heat on the line.... You don't get to be a champion by being nice.
    exactly. nowhere in slater's decision did the thought that parko's wave would be an awesome wave for the spectators & armchair pundits to watch cross his mind. all he thought was, "crap, if he makes this i won't win. oh wait, i've got priority. sorry parko, i'm stuffing you on this one."

  7. #7
    that was my favorite move of the entire contest...! Slater's a real competitor...uses the rules to his advantage. However, it could of been worse though...there could of been a Dean Morrison repeat.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Central FL
    Posts
    4,448
    Seems like a solid move on Slater's part. Parko would of done the same if the situation was reversed.

  9. #9
    I wonder if Parko would've made it out of that wave anyway since Kelly barely did

  10. #10
    I agree that given the rules (and the goal of a contest is to WIN) any competitor would and should do the same thing. The rules are in place for a reason, but where is the reason behind the priority rule in this case? Priority was established to create order and civility when positioning is an issue and guys are scrapping shoulder to shoulder for waves, not create an offense/defense dynamic.
    Obviously it's a competitive advantage to keep someone from completing a high scoring ride. The rule just doesn't make sense to me in pointbreak surf when utilized like it was in this case. It detracts from the actual surfing, which is what the athletes are being judged on.