LOGIN | REGISTER

Page 13 of 22 FirstFirst ... 31112131415 ... LastLast
Results 121 to 130 of 220
  1. #121
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Ocean County NJ
    Posts
    1,021
    Images
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by chicharronne View Post
    It took the dude 3 times to spell "tons" correctly, then spelled leaked, "leaved" right after that.
    The end of the vid said "unfair and bias" news!?
    Is this supposed to be a joke chich?

  2. #122
    Quote Originally Posted by Doug View Post
    It took the dude 3 times to spell "tons" correctly, then spelled leaked, "leaved" right after that.
    The end of the vid said "unfair and bias" news!?
    Is this supposed to be a joke chich?
    dang it, you scamp, you caught me! It's all a big joke. ha ha. nothing to see here.

  3. #123
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Ocean County NJ
    Posts
    1,021
    Images
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by chicharronne View Post
    dang it, you scamp, you caught me! It's all a big joke. ha ha. nothing to see here.
    Lol, I know the actual Fukushima situation in it's entirety is far from laughable and there are many unknowns, but that particular write up was lacking. I mean, how seriously can I take that, when homeboy can't even spell?

    Ps. It's hard for me and I don't particularly like using the word "situation" these days. I wonder why?
    Last edited by Doug; Feb 26, 2014 at 12:35 PM. Reason: ,

  4. #124
    It's is a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma.

    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/...ticle17156108/

  5. #125
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Science mother****er
    Posts
    2,352
    Quote Originally Posted by chicharronne View Post
    It's is a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma.

    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/...ticle17156108/
    http://www.forbes.com/sites/emilywil...-5-easy-steps/

  6. #126

  7. #127
    as if they're not doing it already.

    http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news...1226851651534#

  8. #128
    Just what we(no you Herr Schill) suspected.

    http://enenews.com/anonymous-senior-...y-death-theres

  9. #129
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Science mother****er
    Posts
    2,352
    http://skeptoid.com/blog/2014/01/06/...urces-of-crap/

    ENEnews.com: Habitual Skeptoid Blog readers (hi, Dad!) know I’ve done a lot of writing on the scaremongering related to Fukushima. And a primary source of many of the claims I’ve tried to debunk is a site called ENEnews. While most link farms are all over the place in terms of content, ENEnews is basically all Fukushima all the time. Of its 22 current top stories, 21 are Fukushima-related – mostly vague and scary claims attributed to “scientists” or “officials.”

    Since its founding shortly after the 3/11 earthquake, it’s become a primary source for the alternative media version of events, relentlessly pushing the idea that Japan, the US, nuclear power shills and the mainstream media have conspired to keep the “truth” about Fukushima from us. ENEnews seems willing to make up or exaggerate pretty much any claim in the service making you think toxic radiation is killing the Pacific Ocean, frying the west coast and on the verge of wiping out humanity. None of which is supported by reputable science. A link to ENEnews is a link to bad science.

    Sample “news” articles: “Gov’t, scientists ‘baffled’ over white spots on cows around Fukushima,” “Official detects radiation spike on California beach, now at 500% normal levels” and “Russian Experts: Fukushima pollution spreads all over Earth, clearly a large amount of fish, seaweeds, and everything in ocean has been polluted”


    "ENENews receives no funding from anyone or anything, except 1) People who donate via the button below, and 2) Google, who pays for the two ad spots. Thanks to all who have donated or are planning on doing so, it's nice to know people appreciate your work."

    Fear sells.

    I am sure you will say I work for the nuclear energy commission now. I will continue to believe you are spamming on behalf of the fear-mongers. Scientists are natural skeptics. You are no scientist.

  10. #130
    Is that something that came in your weekly troll packet? Pretty good ending. We, You're no scientist either, but you play one on the internets, Herr Schillmeister!