LOGIN | REGISTER

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 14 of 14
  1. #11
    If I had Canon I would have the EF 400mm f/5.6L USM in my glass inventory. Drives me nuts that Nikon doesn't have a similar lens. The 300 2.8 was great, the only time I shot at 2.8 was at dawn and at dusk, and these days with the higher ISO cameras you can get away with not needing as fast glass.

  2. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by surfingoc View Post
    If I had Canon I would have the EF 400mm f/5.6L USM in my glass inventory. Drives me nuts that Nikon doesn't have a similar lens. The 300 2.8 was great, the only time I shot at 2.8 was at dawn and at dusk, and these days with the higher ISO cameras you can get away with not needing as fast glass.
    Thanks........

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Yorktown, Virginia, United States
    Posts
    46
    Images
    243
    if youre gonna get the canon lens i'd go with the 100-400 and maybe get that1.4 tele convert. no problem reaching out and touching someone with that combo

  4. #14
    Yeah, time will tell. Still learning to shoot action so I'll be working with what I have for now but want to get a new lens for Central America next summer. Then again, I am sure I will mainly film in HD.