Beach Replenishment

Discussion in 'Mid Atlantic' started by LBCrew, Oct 4, 2011.

  1. CaptJAQ

    CaptJAQ Well-Known Member

    386
    Jul 22, 2011
    Love the comment (copied here in case it gets nuked)
     

  2. SUPREME

    SUPREME Well-Known Member

    148
    Sep 8, 2011
    Great, just when I thought there would be hope to the closest break to me (sandy hook), this jerkoff pulls another great one. NJ beach replenishment rocks! :mad:
     
  3. pvjumper05

    pvjumper05 Well-Known Member

    685
    Jun 15, 2008
    every friggin year, theres always some beach that spends millions upon millions to replenish something that naturally erodes. this will never change ugh
     
  4. Uncle Irish

    Uncle Irish Well-Known Member

    233
    Aug 16, 2011
    "Pissing in the wind," is the perfect way to describe it. Let's spend a boatload of money on a project that provides a very short term solution to erosion, destroys whatever remaining breaks we have, and creates extremely dangerous swimming conditions. Sounds like a win/win situation to me.
     
  5. surfrr

    surfrr Well-Known Member

    226
    Sep 29, 2010
    As long as the counties continue to take in millions in tourism revenues each year, the trend will likely continue. Our congressional reps lobby each year for millions to fund Army Corps projects like this. Now could the money be put to better use, I think so but I'm sure there are some that support it. The good news is that it only takes a year or two of noreasters and such to rip away the dredged sand and return breaks to their prior conditions. I'm seeing some spots that were dredged two years ago working better than ever thanks to Irene. Plus I'd say 13$ million is a drop in the bucket compared to what is spent to replenish Cape May Island every two years.
     
  6. SJerzSrfr

    SJerzSrfr Well-Known Member

    327
    Mar 2, 2010
    Get over it. you guys b!tch about the same thing every season. the only way our local beach towns survive is if we have a beach. no beach, no tourists. plus, they say they are starting in november, so that sand is gonna be moved around so much during the winter months. only gonna take a short amount of time for the sandbars to get good. not like the summer where it takes until fall.
     
  7. Uncle Irish

    Uncle Irish Well-Known Member

    233
    Aug 16, 2011
    I wouldn't have a problem if it actually worked, but the sand erodes after a few years anyway. A lot of money being spent for a short-term fix. Not an engineer so I don't know if there is a long term solution, but this does not seem to be a long term viable answer. At some point, the rest of the state is gonna get sick of pouring money into the beach.
     
  8. Sniffer

    Sniffer Well-Known Member

    Sep 20, 2010
    Any alternatives? If so come up with a good plan. In the eyes of the govt their solution is working. The replenishments do offer larger beaches for the summer tourists and even though the beaches do disappear after a couple of years that sand is still just offshore offering some protection.
     
  9. MonmouthSurfer

    MonmouthSurfer Member

    13
    Sep 1, 2011
    This drives me crazy. First of all, it doesn't work. It never has. I worked at Driftwood beach club in sea bright all through high school and college and we would come back every summer to see the beach totally wiped out again. You can't do this without putting in some type of jedi or artificial reef. The long shore current is way too strong in our area. On top of that, every time they do this they cover the white sand with that gross dark brown poo shard sand. The argument that it helps tourism couldn't be more false. There are public beaches in Monmouth beach but lest we forget your can't park anywhere to get to them so essentially there are no public beaches. Add this to the destruction of any waves and it makes me feel like I'm taking crazy pills.
     
  10. Sniffer

    Sniffer Well-Known Member

    Sep 20, 2010
    Monmouth is probably the worst area to do a beach replenishment because the sand just disappears into that deep trough just off the beach. Its a bluff system as apposed to an island or barrier island. I agree that it is a waste up there....needs a good plan to change the Govt thinking.
     
  11. dmonster

    dmonster Well-Known Member

    66
    Aug 26, 2011
    Dredging up sand makes for pretty good fishing sometimes though....
     
  12. Sniffer

    Sniffer Well-Known Member

    Sep 20, 2010
    "Surfing is fun, fishing is no fun." -The Polynesian Kid from Endless Summer 2
     
  13. dmonster

    dmonster Well-Known Member

    66
    Aug 26, 2011
    1. Surfing
    2. Fishing
    3. Waiting to surf
     
  14. dave

    dave Well-Known Member

    448
    Dec 11, 2008
    no town within commuting distance of NYC/North Jersey/Philly - which includes all of Monmouth County - depends on summer "tourism" dollars for anything. All this is is politicians spending tax money to do stuff because it makes them look like their "doing" something and it gives them a way to reward their allies and friends with contracts.
     
  15. wallysurfr

    wallysurfr Well-Known Member

    918
    Oct 23, 2007
    alternative plan:

    Giant canvas bags filled with sand. Giant.
     
  16. cgilhorn

    cgilhorn New Member

    1
    Oct 7, 2011
    Trust me. The tourism business keeps these towns afloat. I know locals who like to think they don't but they really do. Who is going to spend $5,000 on a rental property for a week where they can't go to the beach?

    Beach replenishment is a necessary evil. It has been proven time over time that it is only a short term solution. The good news is that it produces jobs to help the economy going. Not a ton of jobs but a few extra jobs are always welcome. So I think this would be a good thing.

    Everyone on this thread is part of the problem since not one of us can come up with a long term solution. So I think we all should go back to the drawing board and figure out what a possible long term solution might be, form a group, get some scientific proof and then present to your local government. Which I know no one will do including myself.

    Let's just exclude the guy who mentioned putting in a jedi in the previous post. I don't think Luke Skywalker or Yoda in the water would really help. Maybe a jetty would work?
     
  17. LBCrew

    LBCrew Well-Known Member

    Aug 12, 2009
  18. LBCrew

    LBCrew Well-Known Member

    Aug 12, 2009
    Not exactly... it get's transported back to where it came from... off Sandy Hook, where it was dredged to begin with. The Hook just keeps getting longer due to littoral drift. A properly constructed artificial reef will help mitigate that, too.
     
  19. rDJ

    rDJ Well-Known Member

    355
    Jul 23, 2007
    I would love to see them at least attempt a proper artificial reef rather than dumping more money into a very temporary fix. They can't possible screw that up any worse than pumping live ammo on the beach in Surf City.