nuclear material dumping in pacific

Discussion in 'All Discussions' started by archy 2.0, May 16, 2013.

  1. yankee

    yankee Well-Known Member

    Sep 26, 2008
    Eat too much of any darn thing & you're going to 'get' cancer. Just sayin'....

    And what in the name of Laird Hamilton does this thread have ANYTHING to do with surfing?
     
  2. brewengineer

    brewengineer Well-Known Member

    Jun 22, 2011
    Ok. You keep crapping yourself to death. It doesn't take a genius to understand that your body is rejecting something, and it isn't good for you. Why am I arguing with a paranoid schizophenic?
     

  3. archy 2.0

    archy 2.0 Well-Known Member

    Jul 5, 2012
    I go twice a day buddy. nice n healthy. and how do you know your body is rejecting a harmful toxin such as aspartame with the formation of cancer?. its not like you have a few cans o soda one night and wake up with a brain tumor in the morning. so your defense of aspartame has been squashed. why so mad? don't bash me as a paranoid schizophrenic. i'm not scared, just informed, just trying to inform others.
     
  4. archy 2.0

    archy 2.0 Well-Known Member

    Jul 5, 2012
    yeah heard that one before. but I haven't heard of anyone contracting cancer from eating organic blueberries all day everyday.
     
  5. brewengineer

    brewengineer Well-Known Member

    Jun 22, 2011
    Where did I defend aspartame? I said it doesn't cause cancer, which has nothing to do with other side effects. Btw, diarrhea is your body's way of rejecting thing. I guess you think vomiting is healthy. Lets start bloodletting. I think there may be a few screws loose. Are you even a surfer? All you post about is conspiracy bullsh1t. What is your purpose in a place that doesn't adhere to your beliefs?
     
  6. archy 2.0

    archy 2.0 Well-Known Member

    Jul 5, 2012
    you defended it right here. (no reason to fear cancer from aspartame) when even Harvard studies showed that it causes cancer http://www.mpwhi.com/consumption_of_artificial_sweetener_and_lymphoma.htm BTW who said anything about diarrhea or vomiting. and yes i'm a surfer. I posted on the dumping of nuclear waste into the pacific ocean, didn't I? doesn't sound like conspiracy bull**** to me. sounds like a concerned frequenter of the ocean. like I said before either you're argumentative or cant admit you're wrong. BTW you have so much faith in the official medicine George Washington's death may have been caused by bloodletting.
     
  7. brewengineer

    brewengineer Well-Known Member

    Jun 22, 2011
    Ok, using mpwhi.com as a reference is laughable. I am done here. No reason to argue with someone that gets their "facts" from conspiracy sites.
     
  8. yankee

    yankee Well-Known Member

    Sep 26, 2008
    There's always a first for everything.
     
  9. archy 2.0

    archy 2.0 Well-Known Member

    Jul 5, 2012
     
  10. brewengineer

    brewengineer Well-Known Member

    Jun 22, 2011
    LOL. Official documents, yet they are only on the Mercola site.

    *These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. If you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or have a medical condition, consult your physician before using this product.

    My favorite disclaimer on that site. It's not like they stand to make money by bashing the chemical industries or anything.
     
  11. archy 2.0

    archy 2.0 Well-Known Member

    Jul 5, 2012
  12. brewengineer

    brewengineer Well-Known Member

    Jun 22, 2011
  13. archy 2.0

    archy 2.0 Well-Known Member

    Jul 5, 2012
    You make a fool of yourself because by denying every independent research presented to you on the dangers of aspertame as conspiracy theory, means you support the idea that it is safe for consumption. I guess you approve of fluoridated drinking water too?
     
  14. brewengineer

    brewengineer Well-Known Member

    Jun 22, 2011
    What is wrong with you? I didn't deny independent research. I said the Harvard Law thing is not a scientific document. I said the FDA thing was interesting. However, those are letters, and the real data is in references.
     
  15. CBSCREWBY

    CBSCREWBY Well-Known Member

    Feb 21, 2012
    We are all getting brain cancer from looking at this thread. I think Archy works for the Cancer Company.
     
  16. brewengineer

    brewengineer Well-Known Member

    Jun 22, 2011
    He probably owns a natural foods company.
     
  17. archy 2.0

    archy 2.0 Well-Known Member

    Jul 5, 2012
    Haha that's a good one. Props
     
  18. archy 2.0

    archy 2.0 Well-Known Member

    Jul 5, 2012
    It is for the average American family. You argued the Gerson therapy with a link to the Cancer Society. I pointed out their misrepresentation on of the safety of aspertame, which would mislead the general public in making choices concerning their personal health, if they were to take that literature as a valid basis on such decisions. Much like you did. No one has any monetary benefit from exposing the dangers of aspertame. You may claim they own a natural food company as their motive, but pointing out the dangers of aspertame does not increase the sale of vitamins.it doesn't take a genius to know that natural organic foods are far superior to ones health than processed genetically altered pesticide herbacide fungiced hormonal laden foods. It does however monetarily benefit the chemical drug medical companies to bash natural approaches.
     
  19. archy 2.0

    archy 2.0 Well-Known Member

    Jul 5, 2012
    You probably work for Monsanto.
     
  20. brewengineer

    brewengineer Well-Known Member

    Jun 22, 2011
    I am not sure they need a diesel engine development engineer.