Fukishima update: Leak

Discussion in 'Non Surf Related' started by archy 2.0, Jul 16, 2013.

  1. chicharronne

    chicharronne Well-Known Member

    Jun 22, 2006
    dang it, you scamp, you caught me! It's all a big joke. ha ha. nothing to see here.
     
  2. Special Whale Glue

    Special Whale Glue Well-Known Member

    Oct 8, 2011
    Lol, I know the actual Fukushima situation in it's entirety is far from laughable and there are many unknowns, but that particular write up was lacking. I mean, how seriously can I take that, when homeboy can't even spell?

    Ps. It's hard for me and I don't particularly like using the word "situation" these days. I wonder why?
     
    Last edited: Feb 26, 2014

  3. chicharronne

    chicharronne Well-Known Member

    Jun 22, 2006
  4. brewengineer

    brewengineer Well-Known Member

    Jun 22, 2011
    http://skeptoid.com/blog/2014/01/06/its-time-to-play-know-your-sources-of-crap/

    ENEnews.com: Habitual Skeptoid Blog readers (hi, Dad!) know I’ve done a lot of writing on the scaremongering related to Fukushima. And a primary source of many of the claims I’ve tried to debunk is a site called ENEnews. While most link farms are all over the place in terms of content, ENEnews is basically all Fukushima all the time. Of its 22 current top stories, 21 are Fukushima-related – mostly vague and scary claims attributed to “scientists” or “officials.”

    Since its founding shortly after the 3/11 earthquake, it’s become a primary source for the alternative media version of events, relentlessly pushing the idea that Japan, the US, nuclear power shills and the mainstream media have conspired to keep the “truth” about Fukushima from us. ENEnews seems willing to make up or exaggerate pretty much any claim in the service making you think toxic radiation is killing the Pacific Ocean, frying the west coast and on the verge of wiping out humanity. None of which is supported by reputable science. A link to ENEnews is a link to bad science.

    Sample “news” articles: “Gov’t, scientists ‘baffled’ over white spots on cows around Fukushima,” “Official detects radiation spike on California beach, now at 500% normal levels” and “Russian Experts: Fukushima pollution spreads all over Earth, clearly a large amount of fish, seaweeds, and everything in ocean has been polluted”


    "ENENews receives no funding from anyone or anything, except 1) People who donate via the button below, and 2) Google, who pays for the two ad spots. Thanks to all who have donated or are planning on doing so, it's nice to know people appreciate your work."

    Fear sells.

    I am sure you will say I work for the nuclear energy commission now. I will continue to believe you are spamming on behalf of the fear-mongers. Scientists are natural skeptics. You are no scientist.
     
  5. chicharronne

    chicharronne Well-Known Member

    Jun 22, 2006
    Is that something that came in your weekly troll packet? Pretty good ending. We, You're no scientist either, but you play one on the internets, Herr Schillmeister!
     
  6. aka pumpmaster

    aka pumpmaster Well-Known Member

    Apr 30, 2008
    I think you are on to something here. He seems to always post on this type of stuff. I smell 'paid poster' all over the place.
     
  7. chicharronne

    chicharronne Well-Known Member

    Jun 22, 2006
    you got me. I only get paid when I get shill response, thanks yous twos.
     
  8. brewengineer

    brewengineer Well-Known Member

    Jun 22, 2011
    I have worked as a chemist and as an engineer, so I would say my life is closer to the scientific world than your career of spamming the forum with pseudoscience. More than one person on this forum knows my real name and what I do for a living. But don't let me stop you from enjoying your fantasy world. One of us posts only when misinformation or fear mongering is being spread. The other starts multiple new threads and posts to push fake news and sourceless claims. The evidence isn't working in your favor here.
     
  9. chicharronne

    chicharronne Well-Known Member

    Jun 22, 2006
    I'm a professor and biochemist with 5 degrees for telling a shill when I hear one. And I hear you clucking, pheasant.
     
  10. brewengineer

    brewengineer Well-Known Member

    Jun 22, 2011
    Hahaha, now that's funny. A biochemist/professor who doesn't care about references or verifiable sources of information. Now you are really making sh1t up.
     
  11. chicharronne

    chicharronne Well-Known Member

    Jun 22, 2006
    No Schitt D!ckless Tracey. I'm beginning to think you're just a program set up by the .01 percenters to send out misinformation. DOES THAT COMPUTE!
     
  12. brewengineer

    brewengineer Well-Known Member

    Jun 22, 2011
    Data and verifiable resources are not misinformation. Factless quotes from anonymous "insiders" is misinformation. I am enjoying your shill comebacks. There are many on here that think you are full of it, so I guess they are all paid commenters. I just hope you are trolling hard, because I can't believe anyone would be so gullible in real life.
     
  13. nynj

    nynj Well-Known Member

    Jul 27, 2012
    HAHAHAHAHA!!! YOU send out misinformation!!!

     
  14. HARDCORESHARTHUFFER-RI

    HARDCORESHARTHUFFER-RI Well-Known Member

    Sep 17, 2013
    jump shark.jpg

    ..............
     
  15. leetymike808

    leetymike808 Well-Known Member

    752
    Nov 16, 2013
    So brew are you saying the fukishima leak isnt causing damage to the ocean?? Or just that the info chich is putting out is wrong?
     
  16. chicharronne

    chicharronne Well-Known Member

    Jun 22, 2006
    That's the impression I get. But who am I to say a computer is wrong? Just a mere tin hat wearing, conspiracy theory spouting, ne'er do well.