Maybe now we won't hae to remove our shoes.

'that's real retarded sir"

- rachel jantel

 

i blame the langoliers.

 

if you in uniform most the time you dont have to.

 

My theory is one of the pilots was suicidal, but he didn't want his family knowing that he killed all those people. He wanted to go down as a hero so he hid the plane and then dive bombed it in the middle of nowhere after hiding it from radar/turning off transponder.

Of course I have NO IDEA what actually happened, but that seems to be the most plausible explanation because why else would he fly for 6 hours hiding the plane/going to different way points/turning off the transponder. If terrorists wanted a plane to keep,(ie put explosives in) they could easily get a cargo plane. Why go through the bother of a passenger jet. So that's the only theory that makes any sense.

 

they come up with a new reason everyday.well guess what,all the people are most likely dead and we will never know the true story.first it was the threat of 2 Iranians with stolen passports.are they al queda,well idk,but im pretty sure they are at the bottom of the ocean with 235 other people.then they said the pilots commited suicide,well I remember the first week the nypost did a story on the pilots and said they were party animals,theyd invite girls to the cockpit,have drinks,smoke cigs.doesnt sound like someone who would kill themselves.I think its some burmuda triangle shyt,where the plane just disappeared.but with all our technology,we can see north korea building nukes via satellite from Nevada,but we cant find a plane?scary too because it was close to indo,and I was planning on going there this summer.

 

did anyone else hear that 20 employees of a semi-conductor company (all engineers) were aboard the plane?

 

One of the major newscasters seriously stated that it may have been an act of something "other worldly".

They're really grasping at straws here!

 

Captain Elvis. Elvis needs planes.
http://youtu.be/4VTo064bXms

 

hasn't been disproved....

 

What I don't understand is how on earth could we manufacture a plane that has a button to "turn of tracking". Like who would ever have a reason to turn of the tracking of your plane? I just think someone is making up that story because they have no god damn idea what happened to the plane.

 

When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.

 

The latest Time magazine had a story about this incident and explained some of these questions. Apparently these electronic devices would interfere with older rardar systems at airports so they needed to occasionaly be turned off. That is no longer the case but they've never bothered to eliminate the ability of these things to be shut down.

What gets me is that the NSA (or whoever) can track me anywhere in the world by the nifty cellphone I carry in my pocket and its built in GPS. But we can't track a giant friggin' aircraft? Time mag explains that the air carriers haven't fitted their aircraft with GPS due to the large expense involved. I'm no rocket surgeon but I say how about we do away with the on/off switch for the tracking devices and get every airplane a friggin' Garmin Nuvi? Instead of putting this technology that we do have into every plane beforehand we'd rather spend millions (billions?) after the fact searching for this thing. Just who is paying for all of this anyway?

 

All right guys, let's put this one to bed. This is what really happened:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I16_8l0yS-g