GMO's cause cancer

Discussion in 'Non Surf Related' started by archy 2.0, Mar 19, 2016.

  1. archy 2.0

    archy 2.0 Well-Known Member

    Jul 5, 2012
    Yeah I made up the scientific literature and wrote the report for Bloomberg.

    manHandsOnHead.jpg
     
    Last edited: Mar 19, 2016
  2. archy 2.0

    archy 2.0 Well-Known Member

    Jul 5, 2012
    If you're serious you can chelate the residue from the body and possibly reverse the condition.
     

  3. HaydukeLives!

    HaydukeLives! Well-Known Member

    396
    Mar 24, 2015
    mang, it says it within the first 500 words of the abstract in the second link, along with a laundry list of other diseases/ailments.

    to start an conversation of differing opinion based on subjects and essays presented is one thing, being an ignorant d1ck is another.

    archy, i do believe that gmo's are cancer causing. I believe that anything we do to manipulate a raw food could be potentially hazardous to health; however, in the winter months when i am unable to grow my own crop i dont make nearly enough money to clean the all crap (beer included) out of my pantry and replace it with all non gmo/organic foods.

    How do you recommend removing gmo products from my shelves and diet? And please dont just tell me to buy organic, its close to the same price.... ive tried countless times, and its not.
     
  4. Barry Cuda

    Barry Cuda Guest

    Chelating agents are very toxic as well.
    We each choose our poisons.

    And anything causes cancer when given in the massive doses to rats as NIH is so want to do. Hell, even reading too many archy posts will give a person cancer of the brain.
     
  5. chicharronne

    chicharronne Well-Known Member

    Jun 22, 2006
    How they made the GMO gene is enough to keep any one from voluntarily ingesting it. They discovered a bacteria growing in a bunch of round up and spliced that gene with the organism.
     
  6. archy 2.0

    archy 2.0 Well-Known Member

    Jul 5, 2012
    I dont Know.
    How did humans survive winters for thousands of years without GMO's?
    Even more recently (100 years ago) how did humans survive the winter without GMO's?
     
  7. archy 2.0

    archy 2.0 Well-Known Member

    Jul 5, 2012
    There are natural non toxic effective chelaters.
     
  8. Barry Cuda

    Barry Cuda Guest

    You mean the ones that do not work??
     
  9. archy 2.0

    archy 2.0 Well-Known Member

    Jul 5, 2012
  10. archy 2.0

    archy 2.0 Well-Known Member

    Jul 5, 2012
    Thank you.
    It's obvious he didn't get that far.
    He needs sound bites and headlines to form conscious thoughts.
     
    Last edited: Mar 20, 2016
  11. Barry Cuda

    Barry Cuda Guest

    Let's see....you tell us government and corporations are planning to control us.
    Then you back up your allegations with government data// (NIH?).

    And then you claim to be sole practitioner of "independent thought".

    Sorry arch--I told you before--stop with the "absolutes"; nobody holds the "truth".
    Certainly not you, or me, for that matter.
     
  12. northendcanyon

    northendcanyon Well-Known Member

    160
    Mar 21, 2013
    He also didn't believe black holes existed even though his own calculations led to them. He didn't know we would be able to make robot bees that are better than bees (this is being researched.)

    Bees are not that important. Ants are also pollinators, although less effectively, and there are more ants than just about all other biomass combined. ( I Made that up but there's a lot of ants ok.)

    GMO is tossed around way too loosely. It is not in itself evil. It is most likely the biggest boon to human civilization in modern times.

    But I do think dumb people are being systematically allowed to be dumber and less important in the evolution of our species, which I personally favor because dumb people are difficult to reason with.
     
  13. Barry Cuda

    Barry Cuda Guest

    Actually, given the population explosion, lack of a consistent predator that feeds on humans is he largest contributor. Nothing to keep us in check. That is consistent with a large biological species die-off similar to what happened during the Permian period, and the Cretaceous as well. We have been in a die off now for a couple of million of years; we just noticed it recent times. And no--it is NOT due to "global warming". We are the one species on Earth that COMMONLY dies of "old age". No other species can say that, unless we are protecting it.
    So, yes, a bee die-off would be significant. In fact, any species die-off is significant, because it is another link in the web that weakens the biosphere. We will soon reach a threshold with so many species gone, that the web collapses. Fossil records back that fact up.
    Then, slowly, remaining animals evolve to refill the vacant niches. But, we will be gone, in all probability, and the Earth will be glad to see us gone!!

    Being eaten by a shark or one of the few remaining predators is, now a days, just pure bad luck for an individual--has zero effect on our population dynamics.

    Thank you, Barry Cuda, BS, MS, PhD,
    Prof of Paleontology & Biological Sciences.
    University of Cowabunga
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 20, 2016
  14. northendcanyon

    northendcanyon Well-Known Member

    160
    Mar 21, 2013
    That's just ridiculous. I guess it fits in with some peoples fantasies that the world is going to end soon but it won't, life will persist as it has until you're dead and gone and all the worrying and stressing you do will be futile at best.

    I'm part of the technological singularity. I will help push the evolution of our species into the biotechnological era.
     
  15. northendcanyon

    northendcanyon Well-Known Member

    160
    Mar 21, 2013
    Btw I have a real degree in biology : )
     
  16. Barry Cuda

    Barry Cuda Guest

    You obviously don't know how to read; reading comprehension is low on your part due to you technology obsession.
    Most species do not survive more than one million years. We have already spent 250,000 of it evolving to knuckleheads like yourself!! hahahahaha!!!
    Either that, or you believe "God" will have you survive because he "created" you.
     
  17. archy 2.0

    archy 2.0 Well-Known Member

    Jul 5, 2012
    Then why debate me on natural vs. pharmaceutical chelation?
     
  18. archy 2.0

    archy 2.0 Well-Known Member

    Jul 5, 2012
    Oh Barry that's fukin classic mate ;)
     
  19. archy 2.0

    archy 2.0 Well-Known Member

    Jul 5, 2012
    Do you look up to people like Ray Kurzweil and Bill Gates?

    Trying to hack nature will only result in failure. If we as a species are to survive we must learn to work within the model that has proven effective for billions of years.
    IDGAF what kind of degree you have, you're delusional!
     
  20. chicharronne

    chicharronne Well-Known Member

    Jun 22, 2006
    You sound like you've ingested too much of Monsantos product. OR you the new shill that's replaced Brewshilla. His department, which is charged with accusing people of tin hat wearing Nibiru conspiracies, has been disbanded.