This should be interesting.

Discussion in 'Non Surf Related' started by chicharronne, Apr 13, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. archy 2.0

    archy 2.0 Well-Known Member

    Jul 5, 2012
    No, I'll admit I was wrong,but It's perplexing that people believe the 9/11 narrative by the same people who lied about Sadam's WMDs. Yet they'll label anyone who questions that narrative crazy or unintelligent.
     
    Last edited: Apr 14, 2016
  2. nynj

    nynj Well-Known Member

    Jul 27, 2012
    They don't label anyone that questions "crazy"

    It's just the ones that have crazy ideas about what happened... "No way jet fuel would take down the towers. They went in the day before and set up explosives throughout the towers."

    "I don't care that thousands of people watched planes hit the towers with their own eyes. Planes didn't hit the tower"

    Those people are crazy
     

  3. DawnPatrol321

    DawnPatrol321 Well-Known Member

    Mar 6, 2012
    Those people are just as bad as Holocaust deniers, aka Roy
     
  4. archy 2.0

    archy 2.0 Well-Known Member

    Jul 5, 2012
    You're creating a straw man. I never said anything about how the towers came down. I'm questioning the parties involved. If the US gubmit had prior knowledge of the attacks that makes them accessories to the crime.
     
  5. archy 2.0

    archy 2.0 Well-Known Member

    Jul 5, 2012
    In case you weren't speaking to me directly, is it crazy to question that the US may have had prior knowledge?
     
  6. yankee

    yankee Well-Known Member

    Sep 26, 2008
    Similar crazies (originating in France, imagine that) insist that it was a cruise missile that hit the Pentagon, not a Boeing airliner loaded with humans. They have 'proof.'
     
  7. archy 2.0

    archy 2.0 Well-Known Member

    Jul 5, 2012
    Are you being sarcastic?
    I'm Not claiming an airliner didn't hit the Pentagon, but seeing how the place has security cameras everywhere at every angle, where's the video evidence?
    But I have seen videos of what appears to be a missile and not an airliner hit the Pentagon.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iVHHGsNy9J8
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zze32ZEjt30
    Again not saying an airliner didn't hit Pentagon, but there is no video evidence.
     
  8. yankee

    yankee Well-Known Member

    Sep 26, 2008
    I know people who saw the airliner come over 395, clipping light poles prior to smashing into the Pentagon.
    I know people who witnessed the airliner hit the Pentagon.
    I saw the NTSB place the scraps & wreckage in the North Lot of the Pentagon; every day as I drove Rt 110 I passed what ended up as a gigantic reconstructed wreck, every day for months in that lot.
    I was one of the people in the Pentagon the day after 9/11, called in by one of our clients to help locate certain things.
    The smell of jet fuel & bodies is something I'll never forget.

    Anyone saying that it wasn't an airliner or "show me the video or I don't know" has its head firmly up its stupid, ignorant, jerkwater arse.
     
  9. kidde rocque

    kidde rocque Well-Known Member

    Mar 6, 2016
    I dunno brah, I always figured that her junk always resembled a set of baloney curtains.

    "Now go get your focking Shine Box", lol !!!
     
  10. aka pumpmaster

    aka pumpmaster Well-Known Member

    Apr 30, 2008
    the flaw in your logic is that there was no wmd in iraq. there actually was. Most of it was held in Syria for safe keeping.
     
  11. yankee

    yankee Well-Known Member

    Sep 26, 2008
    Cue ignore asspect when bleating sheeple post.
     
  12. sigmund

    sigmund Well-Known Member

    Dec 7, 2015
    Think pant suits dude, is there anything hotter?
     
  13. LazyE

    LazyE Well-Known Member

    Aug 6, 2014
    Ron Paul said it best. "We know exactly what they have we sold it to them."
     
  14. archy 2.0

    archy 2.0 Well-Known Member

    Jul 5, 2012
    Well if they were in Syria then why invade Iraq with WMDs (depleted uranium, white phosphorous)?
    Was it fear of them using them against US? Then why not invade Russia or China?
    Was it a humanitarian mission? Then why not invade Rwanda, but support Isreal's apartheid?
    Why did we intervene in Libya? Syria?
    Why are we droning in Yemen, Somalia, Pakistan, and not Saudi Arabia, Sweden, Belgium, and France?
     
    Last edited: Apr 15, 2016
  15. DawnPatrol321

    DawnPatrol321 Well-Known Member

    Mar 6, 2012
    I may be wrong, but my guess is because they belonged to Sodamn Insane and his posse. It's kind of like if you had a big illegal weapon but to keep the po-po off your back you decide to hide it at a friends house so when they come to raid your sh*t they come up empty handed. But that weapon is in safe keeping for a rainy day when you decide to go postal. Got it?
     
  16. seldom seen

    seldom seen Well-Known Member

    Aug 21, 2012
  17. archy 2.0

    archy 2.0 Well-Known Member

    Jul 5, 2012
    It still doesn't justify the destruction of a country and deaths of over a million innocent civilians.
     
  18. nynj

    nynj Well-Known Member

    Jul 27, 2012
    I'm not saying you are crazy... I'm not creating anything.

    Just saying those are the types that are labeled crazy
     
  19. nynj

    nynj Well-Known Member

    Jul 27, 2012
    No. It's not... I don't think they did. But it's understandable to have questions
     
  20. DawnPatrol321

    DawnPatrol321 Well-Known Member

    Mar 6, 2012
    Not saying it does, but it does justify going after him and his military. It's unfortunate but "innocent" people always die when war happens, it's comes with the territory. War is ugly, I don't agree with it, but it's been how humans resolve things since the beginning of time.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.