Lame Liberals. Tyrannical of them to want to take free speech, yet the liberals dont even see the irony in theyre beloved clinton family
Typical conservative nonsense argument with the "anti-free speech" line. You have every right to speak your conservative stupidity just as I have every right to say how stupid it is. Does that not make sense to you? Like your days on end of utter genius variations(cuckfish, assfish, etc) of my handle when I haven't even been active in this thread during any of them are dumb, sophomoric and totally humorless, adding zero to the forum. See how that works? You say dumbass sh*t, I tell you how dumb it is but at no point say you can't say it. That's the conservative free speech argument idiocracy in a nutshell. The GOP is bigoted and Trump is an ass-clown and both can say whatever bigoted, assclownery stuff they want and the "lame liberals" will always call them out on it. Research the concepts of tyranny and freedom of speech before you vomit more dumb on the forum.
Obama proudly claims (note: claims; props to Keed) to have deported more Hispanics than any prez, ever. Who's the racist...? The so-called liberals spew all the hate they want to, incite violence against people who don't believe what they believe & participate in violent clashes, a la the Nevada State Caucuses, against their very own. The liberals are the ones being called out for not only violent but criminal behavior. Clinton gave away the farm with her insane email antics. Clinton is bought & paid for by the same criminals on Wall Street/banks that nearly took this nation down (and did not one day of jail time for doing so). Clinton's husband is a rapist & she's a facilitator/enabler. Wake the fugg up, you one-dimensional hick. As for the asshat, that would be you jackass.
The Clintons are agents for the oligarchy that rules America, indeed, that rules the American Empire from Australia and Japan, through North America and Western and Eastern Europe to the Russian border. We know that Hillary, like Bill, is a liar. We know that Hillary is a warmonger. We know that Hillary made the most irresponsible statement ever uttered by a presidential candidate when she declared the President of Russia to be the "new Hitler," thereby raising tensions between the nuclear powers to a higher level than existed during the Cold War. We know that Hillary is allied with the neoconservatives and that her belief in the neocons' ideology of US world hegemony is likely to result in war with Russia and China. All we know about Trump is that the oligarchs, who sent America's jobs overseas, who flooded the country with difficult-to-assimilate immigrants, who destroyed public education, who bailed out Wall Street and the "banks too big to fail," who sacrificed American homeowners and retirees living on a fixed income, who intend to privatize both Social Security and Medicare, who have given the public killer cops, relentless violations of privacy, the largest prison population in the world, and destroyed the US Constitution in order to increase executive power over the American people, are violently opposed to Trump. This opposition should tell us that Trump is the person we want in the Oval Office.
Not a word of that response is an actual response to my argument. Good debate or should I say diversion tactic right there. Bill sexual activities are dog whistle lies created by Newt Gingrich in the 90s, while he was cheating on his cancer suffering wife no less. Get some new conspiracy garbage if you want to spew it. Clinton was bought and paid for by none other than Assclown Trump himself. The greed card is worthless in a debate between the two, if either is fractionally more greedy it's probably Drumpf but it's moot. Both parties are culpable for catering to the rich and wall street it's not worth the text to discuss who is more in bed with them. Clintons emails are a pointless diverion, all top level politicIans do the same thing, including the last Republican president. Emails, banghazi, her husbands alleged sexual behavior? All a bunch of crap to divert the simple minded from the fact that Hillary is more qualified, more intelligent, and more capable than all 17 of the idiots put forth in the GOP primary combined. You just eat whatever they feed you and ask for more.
All we know about Trump is that he is a trust fund baby with countless failed companies and hundreds of small business owners destroyed by his screwing and suing tactics. One who hates women and minorities based on his own words and housing practices. Who cares nothing for anyone but himself and spends all day and night watching tv and on twitter hoping to hear his own name mentioned. The entire world other than the "poorly educated" and the racist right is against him because handing him leadership of the most powerful country in the world is a disaster waiting to happen.
There are two things I've always wanted. One was a Purple Heart. A wounded veteran gave me his. Let me tell you folks, that was a lot easier than actually going and getting wounded. A lot easier believe me. The other thing was to be in the movie Star Wars. Well, now that too has changed. [video=youtube;KU_Jdts5rL0]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KU_Jdts5rL0[/video]
That's my point right there, your argument is nonsensical, the GOP led argument on Banghazi is total crap, not the loss of life. State department funding isn't controlled by the Secretary of State but by congress. The only way to keep them alive would he more funding for more security. Go check who was on the Ways and Means committee leading up to the Benghazi attack and lay your blame there. The reason there were 8 congressional hearings on Benghazi, more than for the 9/11 attack, is to continue the GOP led narrative that Hillary had something to do with the attack. Saying Hillary had nothing to do with their deaths doesn't mean one doesn't appreciate and respect their sacrifice, that argument has zero foundation in fact, but only to speak the truth untainted by Republican political bulksh*t. Edit: it's the foreign affairs or appropriations committee
How so? Logically explain how Hillary is responsible for the deaths in Benghazi? I'd love to hear it. Edit: while you're at it, explain the millions spent on those 8 hearings that found zero culpability for Hillary
yawn cuckfish is flapping about again. Hey cuckfish do you sit to pee by chance? Do you prefer the ladies room?? if you could choose one or the other, mens room or ladies room?
Outside is always first choice. Way to ignore all intelligent debate and go for classy insults again. Shows what a typical Trump supporter is made of. Still waiting for someone to logically explain how Clinton is responsible for Benghazi
Total nonsense. Lawsuit alleges that terrorists "could" have infiltrated her emails to track the ambassador. Even if factual which it patently is not, the attack happened at the embassy, no amount of public email servers would have hidden the fact that the Americans were AT the embassy. A lawsuit is not facts or logic, it's just a lawsuit. Try again.
NPR reported a lawsuit, they didn't "call" anything out. Let's hear it. How was Hillary responsible for Benghazi. Im waiting, still just silence, nonsense, and childish insults. Edit: lawsuit VERDICTS rely on facts. Try again.
The lawsuit filed says they "were" but the filing is not fact. People have sued Budweiser because their life didn't look like a beer commercial after drinking Bud light. It's what's called an allegation. Not a fact.