I post facts. You can't handle the truth. The mark of the fascist left 666. Chill out, sparky & free your mind, the rest will follow. Issues doodmon issues. Stick to 'em, not to me.
US Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor made a plea for public civility during a speech in Minnesota — then admitted that she often wanted to bash her late conservative colleague, Antonin Scalia, over the head with a baseball bat. “There are things he’s said on the bench where if I had a baseball bat, I might have used it,” she told a crowd at the University of Minnesota on Monday, according to The Pioneer Press. She also seemed to mock her other colleagues on the bench during a 90-minute Q&A with students and staffers. ___________________ And....the fascist left again ^^ You gonna say this is Fuxx, siggybutt? Cause it is verbatim.
Senior Democratic strategist resigns after video surfaces showing his staff planning to incite violence at Trump rallies and discussing paying mentally ill-people to disrupt GOP events http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...red-people-incite-violence-Trump-rallies.html
So knowing this, is it so far out of the realm of possibility to think that they also paid these women to say they had been sexually assaulted?
I think it's entirely plausible. Fascist Left has proven that it is willing to do whatever it takes. As well, The Don probably did grab some ass in his time. There are no absolutes in this world. And they're all operating in a dirty, dirty game where here is no morality.
Is it though? They also had Julian Assange's internet cut in Equador because Wikileaks is "interfering with the election". The fix is in people, open your eyes.
Right, and don't get me wrong, I'm not saying he is a saint, but I know BS when I see it. This is the most obvious corrupt election I have ever seen.
So you think it's entirely plausible that the DNC found 9 women that have had encounters with Trump in the past and got them to say they were sexually assaulted? And nobody said no and came forward? They all said yes? No way. And not all the charges are new. One was from 1997, Jill Harth, and Trump settled. So that one obviously happened (especially since we agree that Bill was guilty since he settled with Paula Jones). The rape case of the 13 girl, with his boy Jeffrey Epstein, was filed in the spring and the hearing is coming up in December. I'd say it's way more plausible that women were mistreated/sexually assaulted by Trump in the past. Never said anything because of his power. And now hear him bragging about doing exactly that on TV and came forward. Is the left making sure it's out there and on the front page, absolutely. But they didn't create it
Dude. Apples and oranges. I suppose the left also created a time machine and made Donald do/say those things in the past
No, he did say those things, no denying that. That's why fabricating the rest isn't such a hard sell and is an easy target for them. His foul mouth is all he has been proven to be guilty of at this point. Lots of people have foul mouths but aren't out there doing bad things. I'm sure he's been forward with women, but assault idk. Seeing how this thing is going, I'm not buying it.
They are not all new. There was a $125M suit filed in 1997 by Jill Harth that was prety much exactly what he describes in the access video... And within a month she retracted and Donald settled with her husbands company for an undisclosed amount and the case was sealed... Sounds innocent? You said Bill was proven guilty because he settled one case
I didn't say they were all new, just potentially fabricated. Lots of women lie about this stuff, some are telling the truth, but when a rich person is involved money is a motive to lie. There aren't enough facts on this yet, need more facts.
And a lot of people with a lot of money feel like they can do whatever they want and are untouchable. Some even brag about it.
just like many people with money become targets for women looking for a score. In holding my nose about deciding, i basically compared the positions for both (Trump wins there) and then their negatives. Hillary is a career politician (minus) in bed with wall street(minus) in bed with Muslim counties(negative) severely violated national security (minus) public threaten bills victims (minus). Compared to that Trump is the better choice in my opinion hence my vote goes there with the hope that no matter who wins, Congress grows a set and exercises its check on the Executive branch and keep whoever wins in line.
LOL You're not teaching me anything NYNJ, I know this, not denying it, yes it can go both ways. I'm just not jumping to crucify the guy the minute some "allegations" surface 3 weeks before the election. It's a textbook move to sway the vote because they know and we know, there isn't enough time to prove it true or not, all that matters is that people have doubt, and that's enough for them.
I fully agree with this. It's easy to see her negatives and choose anyone over her. Maybe we'll get really lucky and have a Trump vs Kanye election in 2020... This way we can have 2 unqualified famous douche bags to choose from