Inauguration Day

Wow talk about cherry picking to suit your rebuttal, you basically ignored everything else I mentioned, let alone the rest of that sentence. The point was I am offering a plan to solve all of these issues, not just ISIS. I can go more in depth if that's what you're looking for.

I not drawing the correlation in you Halloween decorations analogy, sorry.

 

Interesting regarding your failure to conceptualize.

I was not "cherry picking", for your information. I addressed the only part of your long statement which caught my attention.

 

Once again Archy, please read what I have written thoroughly. I was very clear my reasoning is not just for climate change. I listed many other possibly YUGE benefits if we switch to solar.

You are not positive if it does or does not yet either, Archy. The jury is still out. You come off a bit elitist talking down to everyone one here like you have all the answers. You come off super elitist when you say people are talking out of their ass about something you can't prove is incorrect.

Quit putting links in your posts, I don't care that you form your opinions thru the media streams you consume. I am interested in what YOU think and YOUR ideas, not whatever you can quickly read, copy and paste. I am speaking only for myself and my logical solutions. I don't see and liberals or conservatives with a plan similar to what I discussed.

 

My failure or it is just a poor analogy. You say potato, I say....

Well if you read the complete sentence you would understand I was offering a solution to solve many big problems we have all in one, ISIS being one of them. The sentence reads...

"None of you guys, Barry and Trump included, have not offered a plan to solve ISIS, energy and our economy."

It was not a long statement, actually just a sentence, which when read fully is obviously is meant to encompass all of the issues listed. And you say I fail to conceptualize...

 

Not to be rude, but are you attempting to declare that every registered member has offered a plan to "solve" ISIS?

 

Wow, you really don't want to debate on this one. Keep grasping straws and "got ya" moments.

I don't care if everyone offers a plan or not. I am more focused on those that just sit back and tell everyone how wrong they are without providing any solution of their own. I find that to be an easy stance that many people on this site love to take.

 

I love how you abandoned your ridiculous "more trees" argument immediately after I pointed out the flaw in your thinking.

 

Let us try again. I asked you two questions, and you failed to answer either of them. Please review:

 

yawning!

 

Because a pigeon delivered it lol

 

I personally feel that man takes up too little of the planet to actually change the climate... But to say that it has been debunked is just incorrect. I think people on both sides that state their opinions as facts sound like jackasses.
So you should stop talking out of your ass when stating an untruth... Especially when someone is trying to have a discussion in a respectful manner.

 

You aren't actually implying that the link you posted is proof that climate change is not real? Are you?

 

Trump is gonna invest in it? Last he spoke on it I believe he said "it is still unproven technology." I can't believe I am saying this but Rick Perry might actually be the voice of reason on Solar in the Trump Cabinet.


You can't prove it yet, we have no history of emitting this much carbon, hence the debate on man made climate change. That is the point of this debate, there is no definite answer as of today. You can read as much as you want on your op-ed sites, the fact remains there simply isn't enough data at our current Co2 output to be sure on either side. I read data, not opinions. This is a matter of science not ideology. I claim your elitism based on the fact you think you can make absolute statements about something so uncertain.

I didn't bring up deforestation until you made the brilliant claim that the trees are going to solve the problem.

Remember "more Co2=more trees".

I merely pointed out that your argument is invalid because of deforestation.

This all started by me offering an idea based around solar to solve the major issues of energy, the economy and ISIS (infrastructure too, but i digress). If you think it is a bad idea, tell me why...or tell me what would be a better idea. If all you want to do is push your agenda, try and place labels on me or just throw insults out left and right, there is no debate to be had.

 

"discussion in a respectful manner" being the key words here. This seems to be getting more difficult as time goes on for you, Archy.