You can stop drinking

Discussion in 'All Discussions' started by Clownface, Jan 29, 2017.

  1. red dog

    red dog Well-Known Member

    Mar 6, 2015
    Drinking is not ok or socially acceptable! this was the first sentence of this post! that sounds like preaching to me!
     
  2. nopantsLance

    nopantsLance Well-Known Member

    Aug 15, 2016
    Tennessee Whiskey

    [video=youtube;4zAThXFOy2c]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4zAThXFOy2c&list=PLlYKDqBVDxX0Qzmoi2-vvHJjOAy3tRPQ_&index=3[/video]
     

  3. SloFlo

    SloFlo Well-Known Member

    Oct 6, 2016
    It appeared to be a statement, to me; now, whether it was a disingenuous statement is a matter of interpretation. Regardless, many additional statements have been made, since such time.
     
  4. SloFlo

    SloFlo Well-Known Member

    Oct 6, 2016
    I wish that I had access to my editing software; this would be so much more fun, darn it, because I thoroughly enjoy being creative with my photos. :)
     
  5. red dog

    red dog Well-Known Member

    Mar 6, 2015
    priceless, lmfao!
     
  6. SloFlo

    SloFlo Well-Known Member

    Oct 6, 2016
    I am not so sure about that being the case, red dog. I do not believe that KR took that photo, nor bothered to purchase it from the owner; additionally, it may not have been retrieved from a "creative commons" (yet another communist code word, of many, these days) website. That photo may very well have a price on it.
     
  7. red dog

    red dog Well-Known Member

    Mar 6, 2015
  8. SloFlo

    SloFlo Well-Known Member

    Oct 6, 2016
    Ohhh, very much so serious. For instance, I am aware that FB used to have a rule that you must own the photo, if you upload it to your FB page; however, being the little commie website that it is, people frequently upload photos which do not belong to them. To further elaborate, many individuals on FB believe that if someone uploads a photo which is a portrait of said "many", said "many" have rights to it, and then said "many" take it, uploading it to their own FB pages; when, in fact, said photo belongs to the photographer having taken the photo, even if it does not have a registered copyright filed. It is much easier to sue said "many", if the photographer actually copyrights a photo. All is the reason that I will not upload any decent photos to the web (unless it is purchased from me, of course, but then there exist various types of copyrights, as well, or if I simply feel like giving photos away, which I have done many times over with people in the past...).
     
    Last edited: Jan 29, 2017
  9. kidde rocque

    kidde rocque Well-Known Member

    Mar 6, 2016
    don't worry Dog...just "conservative" trolling, as opposed to the big dose of "liberal" trolling we've been receiving as of late.

    Liberal, Conservative, blah blah blah. Both just "slaves" to their own confirmation biases.

    Besides, who could possible take seriously the blatherings of some guy pretending to be an old lady?
     
  10. nynj

    nynj Well-Known Member

    Jul 27, 2012
    Ok ok.... I can't take it anymore. I know it's not allowed, but please kill yourself... (Just kidding, or am I) Most won't realize because they have already blocked you, but it will make everyone else feel better
     
  11. SloFlo

    SloFlo Well-Known Member

    Oct 6, 2016
    Unlike yourself, I gave him an honest answer; one in which he and anyone could easily verify, via a little research.
     
  12. SloFlo

    SloFlo Well-Known Member

    Oct 6, 2016
    Prove me wrong! :)
     
  13. kidde rocque

    kidde rocque Well-Known Member

    Mar 6, 2016
    How was my answer dishonest? Couldn't possibly be as dishonest as a dude posing as an old lady on the internet.

    Anyways, it doesn't matter. Despite what Durk182 or anybody else says, I don't stand with you. Not only are you fake and dishonest, but even if you are honest about your political leanings, you are way too fascist for me.

    Go circle jerk yourself, Fred err I mean Flo Hymen.
     
    Last edited: Jan 29, 2017
  14. SloFlo

    SloFlo Well-Known Member

    Oct 6, 2016
    My reply to red dog was factual, while your replies are not; that is the difference.
     
  15. kidde rocque

    kidde rocque Well-Known Member

    Mar 6, 2016
  16. SloFlo

    SloFlo Well-Known Member

    Oct 6, 2016
    ^same. :)
     
  17. SloFlo

    SloFlo Well-Known Member

    Oct 6, 2016
    I own a few statues similar the one depicted in that photo, but none of them have p e n i s e s, lol.
     
  18. kidde rocque

    kidde rocque Well-Known Member

    Mar 6, 2016
    Dude, you don't even have the balls to admit that you are part of the SI administration. It is the only explanation as to why you are able to post without your "green light" flashing.

    Really? You're administration, and you're on here trolling and pretending that you're a conservative old lady.

    You are absolutely the Worst of the worst. You can't even run a website objectively, you are attempting to undermine it, as well as its members, and remain hidden from within.

    I'd call you a pussie, but you're a straight-up D1CK.

    You act like Aphrodite, but in reality you're Herm-aphrodite.

    That's your new nickname, Herm.