Scantily Clad Women Thread closed?

Discussion in 'All Discussions' started by kidde rocque, Feb 3, 2017.

  1. thepartysover

    thepartysover Well-Known Member

    107
    Dec 6, 2016
  2. seldom seen

    seldom seen Well-Known Member

    Aug 21, 2012
    #9fukin12
     

  3. seldom seen

    seldom seen Well-Known Member

    Aug 21, 2012
    Sellout jocks always fold in the end.
     
  4. Valhallalla

    Valhallalla Well-Known Member

    Jan 24, 2013
    Would you care to clarify what you mean here? No pics at all? No pics with females? No scantily clad females? How do you define scantily clad? When you say "Google notification" does that mean it is related to Google ads and they prefer a certain type of content not be included? Or is this one of those "I can't define it but I know it when I see it" things?

    Not trying to be argumentative here. Realize that y'all just shut down a very popular tread without any initial explanation and then you post something vague and ambiguous like the above statement. Knowing how some of the folks are around here they likely will test the limits unless you clearly define what is and is not acceptable. And then some of them will still test those limits.

    Againe, not trying to be an asshole just issuing a query for everybody's benefit.
     
  5. seldom seen

    seldom seen Well-Known Member

    Aug 21, 2012
    Is this too much breast?

    [​IMG]
     
  6. Turk182

    Turk182 Well-Known Member

    255
    Jan 26, 2017
    They didn't even lock the thread. Just ghosted it. That some blag bag sh!t right there.

    Plan B seldom
     
  7. seldom seen

    seldom seen Well-Known Member

    Aug 21, 2012
    No doubt. That was the sign Duder.
     
  8. Valhallalla

    Valhallalla Well-Known Member

    Jan 24, 2013
  9. kidde rocque

    kidde rocque Well-Known Member

    Mar 6, 2016
    Only two people have referenced "cut and paste" and "copyright" stuff here previously, within the last few days.

    Wayne, and Flo.

    Some butthurt rat made a complaint to Google.

    And please stop posting pictures of that nasty Hathaway thing. Not beautiful at all.

    Thx
     
  10. seldom seen

    seldom seen Well-Known Member

    Aug 21, 2012
    LOL, got you KR. I'm sorry amigo.
     
  11. seldom seen

    seldom seen Well-Known Member

    Aug 21, 2012
    I actually find her kind of of hot though, with long hair at least.
     
  12. seldom seen

    seldom seen Well-Known Member

    Aug 21, 2012
    This is amazing.
     
  13. Admin-Glen

    Admin-Glen Administrator Staff Member

    747
    Feb 5, 2016

    • Strategically covered nudity
    • Sheer or see-through clothing
    • Lewd or provocative poses
    • Close-ups of breasts, buttocks, or crotches
     
  14. CBSCREWBY

    CBSCREWBY Well-Known Member

    Feb 21, 2012
    There goes the neighborhood...
     
  15. Valhallalla

    Valhallalla Well-Known Member

    Jan 24, 2013
    Isn't it though?
     
  16. Valhallalla

    Valhallalla Well-Known Member

    Jan 24, 2013
    So this is the allowed pics list?
     
  17. kidde rocque

    kidde rocque Well-Known Member

    Mar 6, 2016
    I'm into naughty librarians and such, but I don't even know how to classify this girl. Kinda like a cross between Susanna Hoffs (whom I'd love to pork) and Paula Jones (ni con la tuya). Just something about her that hits a small nerve.

    I'd probably grudge fvck her though.
     
  18. your pier

    your pier Well-Known Member

    Dec 2, 2013
    Hmm...definitely too much of the face...she's a Picasso come to life, and not in a good way
     
  19. kidde rocque

    kidde rocque Well-Known Member

    Mar 6, 2016
    She got hit in the face with a Picasso