So, Frost can't even post a picture of some dude in a sweet pair of designer shorts because that would be considered Strategically covered nudity?!?!
Here's a grainy, sexy picture of me half-naked, wetsuite provocatively draped around my waist, carrying my son's boogie board off the beach doing a crotch garb. Acceptable????
This is Bullsh!t......Strategically Covered nudity, what the f*ck does that even mean Lewd or provocative poses.....are you a bunch of f*cking liberal pansies or what, jeeesus effing Christ I have never heard such a line of crap. Close -ups....really, are you kidding me, just as long as they are covered does it really matter. No.....someone *****ed because they felt offended.....you know, your explaination sucks, and this is what is wrong with America today....ADMIN YOUR A BUNCH OF F*CKIN PU**SIES
Guys, Google flagged the site for showing nudity, which doesn't work out well for the site as a whole. Here are Google's rules to exclude sexually material that includes: close-ups of breasts, buttocks, or crotches sheer or see-through clothing or lingerie strategically covered nudity (includes situations in which genitals are blurred out by camera) images of men or women posing and/or undressing in a seductive manner Sorry, can't ignore Google. Thanks for understanding... Isn't there other places on the internet to view naked women? Hmmm, got to be somewhere on the internet !!
Shenanigans These pics are hurting or could hurt someone's bottom line somewhere and that's the only reason...feels awful corporate Which is fine, just be more transparent...one thing I've learned here, no one puts up with or buys and bs, and they're very quick to sift through it
Take notes Austin. This is how your supposed to talk to people. One day you'll learn how to do your job. And thanks micah. That's making allot more sense then Austin's explanation