And guys, I’m just speculating on this. I don’t know all the answers to your questions, as I still have my own. I’m just putting it out there for discussion. It’s an important piece of the puzzle.
He wouldn’t have opened his mouth if he had nothing. And if you don’t think someone couldn’t put a hit on him you are nuts.
Yeah because that happens everyday. A guy goes on TV and claiming to expose a former US President and ends up dead....Trump would bend over backwards to protect him so he could speak if he actually had anything.
He is a communications adviser....i.e. mouth piece for Trump. He def would go out there and make a claim without a shred of evidence, just like Donnie does all the time.
I can see how that would get some speculation going on who the informant is... but it's still unverified info from an anon source. With so much mud flying around I can't/won't let that stuff into my head. Also, this "orange suit" nonsense is toxic, on ALL sides. I miss when it was just about ruining the other guys career. Just get to the bottom of it, make it public, and let us decide at the ballot box.
I can see why you might think that but I doubt this guy made that up. It’s a fact that there were informants / spies, it’s just a matter of who.
c'mon dude, you know I wasn't referring to them. Maybe I should've used the phrase "leakers" instead of "informants"? semantics semantics semantics
It isn't an anonymous source, it's former Trump campaign adviser Michael Caputo. Here's the brief clip from the quote I posted. I don't think it's nonsense. If they conspired to take the President down then we should all be very concerned, this is our Country we are talking about here. This isn't about them just taking Trump down, this is about Democracy. If these people win, we are all F'd!
former trump campaign adviser appearing on fox news. at least we can be certain there is no bias there.
Anon source was a poor choice of words. What I mean is that if I was to take any substance from that interview I would need to trust this gentleman's word, which I don't. I see everything on cable news as the opposite of trustworthy.
I understand, you're right to be skeptical until you see concrete evidence. I'm just bringing it up as discussion. Whether it's believable or not is up to you to decide. I don't know one way or the other but it sure seems curious and fits into the puzzle if this is in fact a setup, which I have my instincts that says it is.
You're probably right. We'll have to wait for the House Intelligence committee to obtain the documents from Rosenstein and company, but they are stonewalling on that and Rosenstein is potentially facing an impeachment if he doesn't turn over the documents for the origin of this probe among other things.
One more thing - all you who don't own oil stocks, are not Prescott the 3rd in your family, who don't have a big profitable corp, or don't have a govt. pension, and those of you who do live in mommys basement: I see you and hear your bullshit all the time and I don't get it. Trump will do nothing for you! Wake the fuck up. Buy gold now! Interest rates, prices up. Your investments down. Get a real job and quit trying to "shake things up" You'll be living in a tent in three years. IMO LOL