Yep. The Clinton investigation started with White Water, and ended with a blow job. At least this time around we got the blow job out of the way first, now we'll see where it ends.
Because he ran his mouth the whole campaign saying he only hires "the best". You look stupid when you run around making those claims and then your AG pulls the rug out from underneath you. When you run your mouth like Trump, you set yourself up for having egg on your face like he does with Sessions. A little humility would go a longggg way for DT.
Signing 64 Executives Orders is an accomplishment now? Weird, when BO was president, executive orders were him forcing his agenda down our throat. Funny how that changed in just a couple years....Hannity specifically used to call him "King Obama"...hypocrisy personified I guess
They are similar in the fact that both investigations started with one purpose and quickly moved towards something else. Starr was in charge of investigating the Whitewater Scandel and Clinton ended up getting impeached by the House for perjury about a blowjob, nothing to do with whitewater. Republicans didn't mind the scope of the investigation changing many times over a 6 year investigation by Starr into Clinton; but now a 2 year investigation is treason....
You shouldn’t assume that all Republicans were ok with it when it happened then. I could care less if Billy was porking Lewinski, that’s between him and his nasty wife. Of course he was going to lie about it.
Seriously? So now you're trying to argue the Republicans weren't behind the Ken Starr investigation? Now that's a tough sell DP lol You gonna tell me Republicans didn't mind Obamas executive orders next? lol
Nope just curious. I'm surrounded by conservative repubs all day but I play my political and religious cards close to the chest in real life for career reasons. This is the only place I can have a frank conversation anymore and try to understand a different perspective.
Victim of circumstances. Still not seeing your ignorant argument. You said yourself the rug was pulled. He was blindsided. Humility is a side bar. Anyway, his hands are tied and Sessions is feckless.
Like I said, I see where you were coming from. Starr did say that he regretted being a part of “that part” of investigation. I just see Mueller with a one sided agenda to protect the obvious shenanigans among FBI/Hillary and the left. Just as Hoover was Protecting JFK up to his assasination. it doesn’t bother me so much that he prosecuted Manafort. I do hate the way they stormed the attorneys office though.
Porking a 22 year old intern in the White House should get you fired. That makes him a sexual predator. I could care less about a scumbag porking a porn star while his wife is home pregnant. That is between Melania and her nasty husband
Porking a 22 year old when you are married is not being a sexual predator, it's just cheating / adultery. She wasn't under the age of 18. She was a bit young for him at his age by a lot of people's standards. Is it ethically or morally wrong? Maybe, if you judge that sort of thing. But it's not illegal. What he allegedly did with Paula Jones and others could be characterized as illegal.
A 50 year old CEO porking a 22 year old intern in the workplace could easily be sexual harassment... If he made the first move (which I'm sure he did) then he should be fired. That's text book sexual harassment. How do you say no to the most powerful man on Earth? You don't. You let him stick a cigar up your cooter. Banging a porn star while your wife is home pregnant just makes you a POS
You and I weren't there so we don't know for sure. I'm going on instinct that she isn't as innocent as she portrays. I don't see her as a victim. What you say may or may not be true. I'm not saying it's not. But knowing what I know about a lot of women being just as devious as men, I cannot say she was innocent in the whole deal without being there and knowing first hand. She very well could have said NO if she didn't want anything to do with him like that. A woman with strength and character would do just that.
To the point, did the POTUS know and or initiate the meeting with the Russians at Trump Tower for the purpose of gaining dirt on his opponent before the elections, and more importantly what was promised in return? It's already been proven that his son knew the meeting was not for adoption of Russian orphans, it was about "opposition research". Which they both claim is lawful and common practice, but if it's with a foreign adversary, it is collusion, or treason. I don't care who he banged or when. It's very likely he knew about the meeting, and 50/50 shot he initiated it via his underlings. Can the special council prove it? They are getting warm. If he is guilty of that, what did he promise the Russians in return. No more sanctions? The dismantling of NATO? Who know? We will never find out IMO. But even if you like his policies and appointments and can dismiss his rotten divisive lying character, you have to admit it looks bad right now. He may get tossed out by his own peeps if the deniable truth gets brought to light.
I'm going on a instinct as well... We're talking about a 22 year old chubby intern. To think that she's hitting on the most powerfull man on earth i a bit of a stretch. Especially when you look at who it happened with. It's not like he doesn't have a track record. It's not a matter of "she could have said no." She should not be put in that position. Saying that a woman with strength and character would say no is just wrong. When you are put in a position where saying "no" may have a negative impact on your life it's fucked up. And I'm not even saying he should be fired because it's illegal. For me it's more about poor judgement. Morals aside it's just stupid and can cause YUGE problems (which effects a shit ton of people when you run the world)... Get laid and cheat all you want. Just don't do it with interns at work