How long do I need to wait? Until conviction? Dude was a nut job. NOT blaming this on Trump, you guys just need to face the facts. It's not some Soros/Liberal/Fake News conspiracy. Dude was at rally in 2016, has a serious criminal history, and drives around in that van. Only a total nut job drives around in something like that, the kinda guy that has convinced himself the bombs would help Trump. So if I'm trying to decide whether it is just some right wing wack-a-doo seriously off his meds, or Soros and the Deep State have been paying this plant for 2 years just waiting for the right moment to strike (and they chose the 2016 midterms over 2020 for some reason).....based on the evidence provided already, I think I can draw a conclusion. We are on the same team. But the nuts on both sides are not on our team.
An so why are major news networks already spinning it like it’s trumps fault? Story is barely out of the can and the machine is at max effort already. This is the reason why you get so much kick back on these arguements Kyle - there is a MAJOR problem with imbalance in this country no? And then when we bring it up it’s cause we’re crazy conservatives...within 12 hrs they came up with “mountains” of evidence and yet the guy has the IQ of a slow 14year old, and it’s already full steam ahead on every media outlet that’s looking to cash in. How long did it take to get any info on the Vegas shooting, and what did they really ever find after month of investigating? And yet POOF! It’s all right here. If there is any root of arguement, it’s these cancer cell media that instigate and foment it. Here’s my question in general: how does a crazy nut job in a white van manage to make and successfully send IN THE MAIL , that many hoax bomb devices? That’s what I’m looking at. That’s Either a really big screw up nation wide in the postal system or it’s got some other things going on. Possible that because they had no actual explosive They weren’t “sniffed out”? They better hope so because the real crazies are pretty smart and there could be a lot of dead people instead of what happened. And how did soros get one?
And let’s be clear: Totalitarian is precisely what they are. Mark Bray, a Dartmouth lecturer who has defended antifa’s violent tactics, recently explained in The Post, “Its adherents are predominantly communists, socialists and anarchists” who believe that physical violence “is both ethically justifiable and strategically effective.” In other words, they are no different from neo-Nazis. Neo-Nazis are the violent advocates of a murderous ideology that killed 25 million people last century. Antifa members are the violent advocates of a murderous ideology that, according to “The Black Book of Communism,” killed between 85 million and 100 million people last century. Both practice violence and preach hate. They are morally indistinguishable. There is no difference between those who beat innocent people in the name of the ideology that gave us Hitler and Himmler and those who beat innocent people in the name of the ideology that gave us Stalin and Dzerzhinsky.
I don't speak for major news networks, only for myself. And to me, the answer is obvious at this point. But if you want to keep trying to force this round peg into your square hole of conspiracy, all power to ya!
How did Ted Kacynski get away with it for 25 years? How did the Austin bomber just a few months ago get away with sending 5 bombs??? The mail has been a means of sending a bomb all thru this country's history and to be shocked by it is somewhat naive. "These are not hoax devices" (Trump appointed) FBI Director Wray
And then there's the Megyn Kelly getting canned crock pot of PC shiiiiite. "Victim status has become a prized status in our society. It’s a base from which to launch assaults on the dignity and equanimity of others when the need arises." "Playing race and gender ‘gotcha’ is mostly a preoccupation of educated, affluent whites." From Holman Jenkins brilliant & insightful WSJ piece. Yes, absolutely so true. But somehow this tiny fraction of the population manages to terrorize the rest of us, holding vast powers over everyone should we ever step over an invisible boundary and someone is needing an excuse to sack or sue us. These few people would not hold such powers if it were not for utilizing MSM and social media for their ends. Who would care whether Megyn said "blackface" or a physics professor devised an exam question where "Condolezza" throws a watermelon from a roof (the experiment was about volatility). Yet both lost their jobs because MSM picked up on it and created a scandal around it. Trump with his opinion that the press is an enemy of the people has a point.
Eliz Warren listed herself as a minority in the Association of American Law Schools legal directory from 1986 to 1995. She had her ethnicity changed from white to Native American at the University of Pennsylvania in December 1989, about two years after she started teaching. And she agreed to be listed as Native American at Harvard but only four months after she started her tenured job.” Who doubts that Ms. Warren began referring to herself professionally as Native American because she found comfort, security and whisperings of power in the designation? Victim status has become a prized status in our society. It’s a base from which to launch assaults on the dignity and equanimity of others when the need arises. It’s also a defense against such assaults, which can land on anybody at any time.
Weren't Hitler and Stalin known for imprisoning their political enemies? Which side is wanting to "lock them up" nowadays? Point is, it's not just one side getting out of control.
I think anyone with decent head of their shoulders knows that Megan Kelly was fired because NBC didn't want to keep paying her 29mil a year for her terrible ratings. Her Sunday night show didn't even last a month. I agree, not a good look using the ridiculous PC culture to hide behind, but it is pretty obvious she was fired because she was a totally failure on NBC.
You know what Kyle? Sometimes your just a jackwad with your stupid little comments... naive? Put it this way - if you knew HALF of the measures they now have in place in that system, you’d be asking “how” too. I give you a half pass because you truly may not know about them, but to put your pshaw attitude out there and make a comment about someone being naive just takes away anything from a credible post. It comes across as arrogant and patronizing and just a shot in general. You should know better. You complain the loudest sometimes when people do it to you.
And now you owe me some surf stoke Bruh... I was not grouchy and touchy earlier but I get worn thin sometimes and there a lot of things I AM, and many of them need improvement, but naivite’ Isn’t one. I’ve worn many different shoes over my illustrious career of mediocrity and in doing so, have gained a wide range of real life experience verses getting it second hand.