When are people going to wake up?

Discussion in 'Mid Atlantic' started by shark-hunter, Nov 5, 2012.

  1. dreadhead

    dreadhead Well-Known Member

    46
    Mar 2, 2010
    so how much money does it cost to run beach replenishment on the entire east coast every year? and how much does it cost to buy out all the property within 3 blocks of the beach along the entire coast? and while we're at it and discussing possible solutions, how much does it cost to build jetties and new sea walls?
     
  2. aka pumpmaster

    aka pumpmaster Well-Known Member

    Apr 30, 2008
    the obvious solution here is this: let people build on the oceanfront after informing them of the risks and there will be no taxpayer bailout. if an insurance company will sell them a policy then good for them'. no need whatsoever to get government involved.
     

  3. DawnPatrol321

    DawnPatrol321 Well-Known Member

    Mar 6, 2012
    No it's not, it all starts with the those who design and build in the areas that were destroyed, i mean, unless you are ok with having the same uneducated people build the place back up in the same way as before. In no way, should that storm have caused so much damage. Around here most of us don't even go to Lowes or Home Depot, or the grocery store to stock up on storms unless it's a Cat 2 or higher. Sure, she was slow mover, but by no means was it anything NEAR a Katrina or Andrew. I feel for everybody affected by it, but you guys make it sound like it was the storm of the century, it wasn't, it's piss poor design and construction.
     
    Last edited: Nov 6, 2012
  4. aka pumpmaster

    aka pumpmaster Well-Known Member

    Apr 30, 2008
    don't forget though that most of the NJ shore is old (pre and immediately post WWII) construction.
     
  5. shark-hunter

    shark-hunter Well-Known Member

    Apr 29, 2012
    I don't know nor have the time to get EXACT figures. They all cost a ton. Period. How much does it cost when every home is swallowed by the ocean? It's not just about cost. It's about preserving the natural coast and recognizing that ocean is rising. It's common sense. I'm saying the solution is easy. It would be better if the ocean wasn't rising! But it is. It would be better if zoning commisions never let people build ON top of a beach basically. But they did. Now we are left with hard decisions
     
  6. aka pumpmaster

    aka pumpmaster Well-Known Member

    Apr 30, 2008
    wrong...the ONLY decision is to subsidize rebuilding of the destroyed home with taxpayer dollars, and that is not that hard.
     
  7. shark-hunter

    shark-hunter Well-Known Member

    Apr 29, 2012
    I will add this. One sea wall for nyc was estimated to cost over 6 BILLION dollars. So it would probably end up costing 2-3 times that.
     
  8. aka pumpmaster

    aka pumpmaster Well-Known Member

    Apr 30, 2008
    and the cost of buying that property would be 10x that.
     
  9. shark-hunter

    shark-hunter Well-Known Member

    Apr 29, 2012
    Yeah lets rebuild millionaires homes with tax payer dollars. That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard. If you choose to buy/build a home near the ocean. That is on you if something happens. Either buy your own insurance or don't buy near the ocean. Not to say I don't feel bad for people who lost their home, but like I said previously it's on them.
     
  10. DawnPatrol321

    DawnPatrol321 Well-Known Member

    Mar 6, 2012
    Right exactly, sooo knowing this fun little fact, you would think these places would need to be brought up to current code standards no? You gotta adapt, we as humans know WAY more today than we did in the post WWI times. The building codes in Florida are constantly being re-written as we learn more with every passing storm. These same lessons can be applied to New York / New Jersey, but it all starts with educating those people who are responsible. It took a hurricane like Andrew to wake people up around here, not to say it couldn't happen again here, because i'm sure one day it will, but you can minimize the damage with smart design and construction.
     
  11. shark-hunter

    shark-hunter Well-Known Member

    Apr 29, 2012
    Yeah well most expensive real estate on the planet. Just showing how much a seawall can cost. Real estate is much cheaper outside of nyc obviously.
     
  12. aka pumpmaster

    aka pumpmaster Well-Known Member

    Apr 30, 2008

    yeah that's what Ive been saying all along. There is NO need for any government led scheme, let people make decisions and then deal with any possible consequences....
     
  13. aka pumpmaster

    aka pumpmaster Well-Known Member

    Apr 30, 2008
    For rebuilding yes. NO for homes that were not damaged.
     
  14. dreadhead

    dreadhead Well-Known Member

    46
    Mar 2, 2010
    People who live on the water, or close to it, know the risks and have insurance. This whole thread started because you wanted to rant and rave about how we should all move back off the ocean. If you don't live on the ocean, just stop talking. We're here, we like it, we're staying.
     
  15. DawnPatrol321

    DawnPatrol321 Well-Known Member

    Mar 6, 2012
    So just wait for the home to get completely destroyed before you bring it up to code standard? Why would you want to lose a historic home like that? Makes more sense to me to go ahead and take the initiative and make it more structurally sound for an event like this in the future, that way you don't have to rebuild from scratch, you just might need to do some repairs instead. Sure you might lose some of that "old feel" but at least you'll still have your home for years to come. Actually, if you hire the right guy for the job you can still preserve that older feel while bring it up to code standards, and nobody would know the difference.
     
  16. shark-hunter

    shark-hunter Well-Known Member

    Apr 29, 2012
    WHy do you think replenishment takes place by the army corps? IT'S ALL ABOUT PROTECTING OCEANFRONT PROPERTY. It cost millions and destroys wave breaks because of the sand grain their using.

    I'm saying we need to seriously re-think our coastline and to back it back a few blocks. That's all. Change the zoning. You can still live near the ocean. Just a few blocks back would be the new oceanfront. That's all. Anyway, agree to disagree.
     
  17. zrich

    zrich Well-Known Member

    150
    Aug 22, 2011
    People who live near the water in flood prone areas get government subsidized flood insurance. If you want to stay, you're welcome to stay, but you should pay for your own insurance. This alone would cause a lot of people to rethink their decision to own a home near the water. I'm not sure what the subsidized rate is, but I imagine it's pennies on the dollar compared to what a private insurance company would charge to insure that risk.
     
  18. shark-hunter

    shark-hunter Well-Known Member

    Apr 29, 2012
    Oh and you could even back it up 1 block and it would be much better than right now
     
  19. Sniffer

    Sniffer Well-Known Member

    Sep 20, 2010
    It all depends on the area. Every island or ocean front land has hot spots prone to breaching and flooding. These areas should not be built on period. A significant Dune system that has trees will do wonders for the surrounding area. We all ready know all of these hot spots and so does the govt. Its time to use common sense...
     
  20. shark-hunter

    shark-hunter Well-Known Member

    Apr 29, 2012
    Socialism for the rich, but we don't have the money for medicare....let's turn into a voucher.