If much of the deal is being made in secret how do you know that it is just a free trade agreement? ??? .
Yes, he's shown a frequent nasty habit of vengeful actions. Then again, the previous guy had the same issue(s). Probably going back to 1776.
If much of the deal is being made in secret how do you know that it is just a free trade agreement? ???
Ad-hominem much? If I didn't answer you at 1am, why the fock would I be answering you at 3am? Remember, I am not on kiwi time. Further more, I don't think you have any right to call another person on this forum a troll. Please name a recent trade agreement that wasn't done in secrecy. I really don't have much more to add to the topic, so I didn't feel like engaging you. Here I thought your new found wealth was toning down your online trash talking. A wolf in sheep's clothing...
Damn Roy you need to lay off the booze. Can't be good for a guy as old as you to be drinking that heavily. Now get back to playing with your wood and banging sheep and leave the political stuff to the real nations.
Wow Brew, you really struck a nerve with Sheephumper. Must've really gotten him severely butthurt, I've never seen him sack up to anyone like this. Too bad we all know that he can't back it up. Grab his hair and swing him around in circles like a grade school girl fight on the playground during recess. Back on topic: how many of youse remember the secret "Energy Policy" meeting between Dubya, Cheney and Rummy? Anything done in secrecy by the government that doesn't directly affect National Security serves the public no good...only politicians and lobbyists.
Lots of words, none of which cover up the fact that Brewengineer contradicted himself. for the record, I don't drink alcohol, and Brewengineer is definitely a troll.
I strongly diagree on that score. Funny though how he makes a complete **** of himself with obviously contradictory statements on the TPPA and then tries to cover it up with vague bluster.
Roy, where did I contradict myself. You still haven't shown me a recent trade agreement that wasn't done in secrecy. I stated why they are done in secrecy, then attached links backing that up. Then, when it came out that big businesses were not being cut out (allegedly), I stated that it should then become a public negotiation. Either no one but government official are involved, or it should be public. You sure are smug for a guy that never actually makes a focking point. Maybe you should start drinking. It may mellow you out so you don't sound like a total arsehole.
Hello Brewengineer. A contradiction usually requires two propositions. The two which you made which are obviously contradictory are quoted below: