Probably relatively inured to the human virus from repeated exposure, and/or the dumb **** enticed the swan with food & then grabbed the bird. Talk about a ugly woman attempting to forcibly abscond with beauty...
A video of someone running up, jumping in the air and kicking her with both feet into the water would have been great!
Yeah, well there's pretty much a media blackout in this country about Saudi Arabian atrocities bc they buy tons of weapons from us and da Bush's and the Saudi Royals is good friends. The US military is aiding and abetting Saudi's invasion of Yemen.
Just joking cuz I was called crazy couple years ago on here for saying very similar things about the collusion of Gubmit/media/corps.
If this comment is sarcastic or satirical, please excuse what I'm about to say. Because if it's not ... you've once again demonstrated your lack of interest in cashing any of the checks written by your psilosybin-addled mind. Muslim immigrants aren't coming in unvetted, we have one of the strictest vetting systems of any on planet earth, and the simplest effort of research (30 seconds on Google) will prove this. But you don't research anything, do you? You just spew bullsh*t. From TIME: Concerning Syrian refugees ... Multiple law enforcement, intelligence and security agencies perform “the most rigorous screening of any traveler to the U.S.,” says a senior administration official. Among the agencies involved are the State Department, the FBI’s Terrorist Screening Center, the Department of Defense and the Department of Homeland Security. From NPR:The U.S. has admitted some 1,800 Syrian refugees in the past two years ... Officials say 2 percent are single males of combat age." Unvetted rapists huh? Get your facts straight before you preach to people about the world. You can eat vegetables and cry 'contrail' all you want, but until you learn to think critically (evaluating your own perspective against available information, access to which is thankfully plentiful in our society), you'll be just as dumb as the next bacon-eating Walmart customer with a 'George W' bumper sticker on his car. And just like him, you think you've got it all figured out, when in reality you just recite the b*ll**** that's fed to you without question. EDIT: F*ck that Swan-killing ho, I hope someone breaks her f*ckin neck. And that's coming from a man who was, as a child, viciously attacked by a Swan.
TIME? The same TIME Magazine that said Saddam had WMD's? NPR? The same NPR that receives large donations from corporations that profit from war? Bwahahahhahah! c'mon man you got to be smarter than that. Both are major mouthpieces for the gov/corps conglomerate. You know why? Cuz war means big $$$$$$$ for the military industrial complex, and what better way to sell the public on war and its casualties than a trusted source like TIME and NPR. If the vetting system is sooooo good, how did terrosist from 9/11 get in? Or the Boston bombers? Or the San Bernardino shooters? From the LA TImes about SB shooters, "Farook and Malik began plotting a terror attack before they were engaged and before Malik moved to the U.S. last year." Ummm but but
First off I never mentioned anything about unvetted rapists. I'm speaking of the waves of immigrants flowing into Europe. Many coming from a culture like Saudi Arabia where women's rights are next to nill. Not all respect the European view on women and still hold to there culture.
Well seeing how this country has a huge illegal immigrant population/problem, I dont think it would be to hard for North African/Middle Eastern refugee to get in.
I never said it was impossible for people who mean the nation harm to gain entrance. Your exact claim was 'Muslim's aren't vetted,' and I debunked that preposterous claim, with a couple of sources. Now, if you have equally trustworthy sources stating that Muslims are indeed being allowed in without any vetting process, as you claimed, then by all means, post them up. But I know you don't have sh*t. And I know you won't even look for it, because all you care about is confirming the worldview that you already have, no matter how spurious the source. I'm well aware of the biases of media outlets (Judith Miller @ NYT, etc), even those that I find more reliable than others. But you can't claim that a media source is unreliable simply because the source disagrees with you. You need to find an equally reliable source that supports your statement. Which you won't find- because it doesn't exist, and because you're too intellectually lazy to even try. As f*cked as our legal system is, it is thankfully well situated to deny people like you from ever writing or arguing anything legislative. People like you, who pontificate endlessly about things without actually analyzing them, are the very reason why the founding fathers argued for a representative democracy. They were worried that an average dumbasz with an imagination would get all worked up about chemtrails, and bada-bing bada-boom, international air travel and trade have been banned because of some logic-kook's fantasy. People like you are literally the reason why we don't have direct democracy. Thanks d*ckhead. Take another hit of that bong and go get yer f*ckin shinebox.
Come on man! Sources??? You guys are nuts (although apparently pretty intellectual). An elderly women told me once..."never put your trust in man, he will fail you". I have taken it to heart ever since. The other thing is logic.
I can tell you all firsthand that there is a "vetting process"...and it is *very* weak. Do you honestly believe everything the U.S. Government tells you? If so, I have some oceanfront property in Arizona............ And, that same "vetting process" has been weakened considerably under the current administration. FACT. And please don't pull the "conservative / liberal" cards on me, because I disliked Bush every bit as much as the current moron. Color me centrist.