Bill Nye Is Cancer

National Geographic is in an interesting place. Hated by the right for for climate change stance and hated by the left because of who owns them now.

 

C'mon dude, don't do this lol

 

Hahaha dp

 

Gender SPECTRUM?!?

WTF, over?

Those 2 words, that phrase, may be the most concise summary of what ails this country.

Gender spectrum.

Mama Mia

 

Start with learning the difference b/t hypothesis, theory, law, and fact.

I have never seen anything from you that indicates you are open minded about this. In fact, you pretty much state that above.

Dude, you're turning into Archy-lite.

 

Gender neutral is worse. Also dsup Fox is for the old. Have you not noticed every ad is about how to poop better?

 

Wrong TLO. I am open to the possibility. We humans may have had an effect on the climate, I don't suggest we haven't, but to suggest that it's a fact that we have is wrong. My point is that nobody can prove it. Therefore, nobody can disprove it. It's a moot point.

 

Fox sucks. And so does cnn. And infowars. And rawstory or whatever the lefty version of infowars is.

It's all bull****, always has been, and no amount of *****ing, pissing, and moaning on the Internet is going to change a gawd damn thang.

 

Hey, I want to poop better, don't you?

 

On TV, Fox is the most fair and balanced of them all, and I have watched them all.

 

Why can't it be proven?

 

Nope, they just reinforce what you believe. Just like cnn for the left.

 

I like cnbc. Although I don't care much for that Cranmer dude even though he is a jersey shore bud. That Becky quick could catch it though and really quickly

 

If you can prove it, I'm all ears / eyes.

Wrong. You assume too much. I'm an Independent and don't look for reinforcement, I just happen to agree with Tucker on a lot of things. I disagree with several others on Fox. To suggest that they all have the same opinions is false. There is a myriad of opinions if you watch the various different shows.

 

My brother does too. I don't listen to radio however.

 

ALL of the studies are "observational' studies. Obtaining a valid "p" value with observational studies is irrational. Proof is to be found in the statistics.
To PROVE it, you would need a double blind, randomized study, with controls, and study subjects.
That means 200 Earths in the control group, 200 in the study group.
Is that feasible?? Can you get 400 Earths to line up??
If you can, do core studies in the study group, do nothing to the control group.
No?? Then you cannot prove it.
The studies suck, tlok. Period.

 

You stated it can't be proven. I asked why. Now you've switched it around where I must prove it to you to show it can be proven. Logical fallacy.

Not watching fox,cnn, or wasting my time on infowars or raws tory or any of that $hit. Plus I'm done taking a dump and going back to doing something useful.

 

A better response than dps....

 

[video]https://youtu.be/Rv7afcRlloY[/video]

here's the real reason