Trump / FBI / Russians

Did you even verify the source of the study?
What conservative organization?
This one?
Harvard tells students gender can 'change from day to dayhttps://www.campusreform.org/?ID=9079

 

Um yeah. I did read it.
"The research organization Just Facts, a widely cited, independent think tank led by self-described conservatives and libertarians, revealed its number-crunching in a report on national immigration."

 

I don't get it. What does campusreform.org have to do with the article you posted based kn research done by justfacts.com?

Also - you seem to have posted a lot of gender related articles... Confused?

 

Oh.

Well, taking that comment at face value this time then she probably does have a lotta big stuff in the yrs ahead of her, and her hubster does, too.

Yet, it's a long, treacherous 4 yrs of cultural landmines, political potholes & physical danger that we can't begin to fathom that exists for these folks. Look at the insanity of a few weeks ago at the Alexandria ball field.

I hope that Ivanka & their whole crew do well for America. Time will tell.

 

If my dad gave me a shoe company, it would crash and burn faster than.. well something that crashed and burned.

 

"Trump still departed Europe on Saturday in the same position as he started: an unpredictable force on the world stage and an outlier among longtime American partners."
(AP)

I am totally, totally ok with this ^

After all, we see where the previous POTUS simps put the USA in terms of the above (not good).

 

^^^ I agree. "Unpredictable" and "force" > "predictable" and "mom jeans"

now > last year

 

"bright future", homie

She has a "bright future."

She does.

Regardless if it's because her Dad gave her a shoe store, she's smart as fvck and works her a$$ off, or she can calm down the Tasmanian Devil with that almost spooky mellow voice, she undeniably has a bright future.

Undeniably.

Just like we ain't gonna have surf at my beach today.

Ain't up for debate.

Some sh!t just IS.

 

Her past was better, when she was young, and banging all her New York City liberal socialites.
Now, she married a douche canoe....

 

Yeah. And where did they get their numbers?
From liberal Harvard.
Just Facts biased?
According to the interweb JustFacts is just right of center and highly credible when it comes to facts.

 

That quote was from the article you posted... I don't know anything about justfacts.com except that they are and
"independent think tank led by self-described conservatives and libertarians"

So it's not suprising that their research leans right...

I'm not even saying that the research is not accurate, it very well may be... Just saying that it is silly to say "see? DJT was proven right"

 

So you base your opinion JustFacts on what the article said.
That's the same as ridiculing DJT's claim of illegal voters based on the liberal biased media reports, instead of actually checking for yourself.

And if you looked into JustFacts you would see that they are unbiased in their research and highly credible when reporting it.

And why is it silly to be proven right that the voting system is faulty?

 

If they deal with politics, there is no such thing as "highly credible". More like "hardly credible". And then, you are losing any credibility as well. The most credible political journal to date is Mad Magazine........

 

.

 

Huh?
It proved that a large number of foreigners voted in US elections.

 

so potentially 5.7 million illegal votes might have been cast for trump.

 

No--they were petrified of him as he threatened their Welfare checks that you think is okay.
Asshole.
They voted for you biztch Hilary

 

i see nothing in the article or the study it refers to that states these potential illegal voters voted one way or the other. so you are making assumptions. you need to go to justassumptions.com not justfacts.com.

 

it is somewhat interesting that blue states are the ones refusing to assist with the federal voting fraud probe.....