I live in the South and I will never get the love affair with confederate crap. You lost the war, why celebrate failure? The monuments are the ultimate participation trophy.
I disagree. The monuments are nothing more than HISTORICAL remembrances of important persons once of value to the population. To tear them down, no matter what they represent, is to turn your back on your history, good or bad. You then are refusing the lessons to be learned from such former humans, and exposing future generations to repeating the very same errors some of those persons made. "Those who refuse to learn from history, are condemned to repeat it", so the axiom goes. The present tearing down of monuments is nothing more than PC gone wild; those tearing down the monuments will be the very groups that will suffer again once the repetition starts. As stupid as stupid does...... I hope I live long enough to see them be victimized by their american imbecilities all over!!
[h=1]MARTIN NIEMÖLLER: "FIRST THEY CAME FOR THE SOCIALISTS..."[/h][FONT="] Related Articles Comments How to cite this article [/FONT] [FONT="]Quotation from Martin Niemöller on display in the Permanent Exhibition of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Niemöller was a Lutheran minister and early Nazi supporter who was later imprisoned for opposing Hitler's regime. — US Holocaust Memorial Museum[/FONT] [FONT="] [h=2]VIEW PHOTOGRAPHS[/h] [/FONT] [FONT="]Martin Niemöller (1892–1984) was a prominent Protestant pastor who emerged as an outspoken public foe of Adolf Hitler and spent the last seven years of Nazi rule in concentration camps. Niemöller is perhaps best remembered for the quotation: First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a Socialist. Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a Trade Unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me. [/FONT]
I get your point Barry, but to live in South you get a different perspective. I don't think things should be torn down but there are a ton (and I mean a ton) of people that revere these past generals. For what, losing? Why were monuments ever created to losers in the first place? And another argument is that it is about heritage. You want your heritage tied to defeat? It is like the Atlanta Falcons getting a statue for coming in 2nd.
You don't get it. It's about history. It's not a trophy. We can't forget or destroy our history. Good or bad. Win or lose. It was an important time for our Country.
so maybe we should erect statues of dylan roof and timothy mcveigh. how about the tsarnaev brothers while we are at it? they are our history too.
Come to NC for 5 minutes and you will see. They are seen as trophies to many, not just history. The way these past generals (who lost) are slobbered over is just amazing.
I've been to NC many times, just recently too. I cannot control nor care what other people do with their time as far who they worship or look up to. I personally don't have the same feelings those people do but I do recognize the people they revere had a huge impact on our Country. What people need to do is keep history in it's context. Slavery is bad but at the time it was widely accepted and common practice by the majority of those who founded this country. It's not a pretty fact in history, but it's reality. Lots of good was done by these people. If not for them, we wouldn't have the Country we have to today. Gotta take the good with the bad. We are humans, and there are no perfect humans. Not saying to forget or condone the slavery, but keep it in context.
these statues were not put up during "the time it was widely accepted". most were erected in the early part of the last century and again in the post-ww2 era as the civil rights movement was taking shape. always as a big "**** you" to the black people and to the nation as a whole. they are there to honor those generals not as some kind of history lesson.
These statues are very hurtful to a large number of our citizens and their families,many who have fought and died for our country to defend our freedom. Try to look at it from their perspective. Does their historical value outweigh the vision and ideals of freedomme for all that our country was founded upon. Do/should people have the right to march down your street and tell you they are going to kill you and wipe out your family? [video=youtube;6XlguKEh3LQ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6XlguKEh3LQ[/video]
We might as well just destroy this country then, since the majority of the people who founded it had slaves. Got it.
Here in Floridee, if someone came to my house and threatened me I can shoot them dead under the law. So what constitutes reasonable threat? I don't think hate and intimidation should be allowed to march under the guise of free speech. Appeasement didn't work in the 30's in Europe, the Nazis took over with the quickness. Appeasement won't work in modern Amerikkka either. Stand up for freedom for all. Or lose it.
BTW, my wife who is BLACK feels the exact same was as I do. Lots of Black people understand it's part of our history and don't want to tear down the monuments or anything because if we do, we as a society will eventually repeat the same mistakes from the past. By keeping these monuments, it allows free discussion to be had. It helps to educate people on the past and reflect on how far we have come since then. It's not to pay homage to slavery. It's to pay homage to our history as a Nation. Both good and bad.