Jussie Smollett

Discussion in 'Non Surf Related' started by SCOB3YVILLE, Feb 18, 2019.

  1. DawnPatrol321

    DawnPatrol321 Well-Known Member

    Mar 6, 2012
    Yeah I watched the press conference and he seemed very upset. That said, I'm pretty sure it was Democrats who also let him off the hook with a brokered deal. Now, nobody will ever see the pile evidence they had against him. Soooo, Yankee is right in a sense.
     
  2. Barry Cuda

    Barry Cuda Well-Known Member

    Nov 19, 2018
    BS...he is pretending. He is ecstatic about it. He is another liar .........
     

  3. DawnPatrol321

    DawnPatrol321 Well-Known Member

    Mar 6, 2012
    I also wondered if his "anger' is real or fake.
     
  4. Barry Cuda

    Barry Cuda Well-Known Member

    Nov 19, 2018
    He is a phony, head to toe.
     
    Yankkee and DawnPatrol321 like this.
  5. NNYNJ

    NNYNJ Well-Known Member

    928
    Dec 22, 2017
    What would his reasoning be to fake anger?
     
  6. DawnPatrol321

    DawnPatrol321 Well-Known Member

    Mar 6, 2012
    To make it appear that HE did everything he could so that Smollett's release and charges being dropped don't get pinned on him or so that people can say the cops did their job and so it looks like he is doing a good job too?

    I'm not saying he is in on it, but I'm not going to rule out the possibility given his terrible track record, who he is connected to, and the brand of politics he subscribes to.
     
  7. NNYNJ

    NNYNJ Well-Known Member

    928
    Dec 22, 2017
    I would agree, but why would he want Smollet to walk and then publicly bash him. I don't see reason to do that.
     
  8. DawnPatrol321

    DawnPatrol321 Well-Known Member

    Mar 6, 2012
    What if Obama (either of them) called in a favor? Does nobody find it convenient this happens immediately after Trump is cleared of collusion? There was nothing else in the news cycle to muffle the Mueller report results, so this may serve as a smoke screen to change the narrative again. This coming right off the heels of Michelle Obama's Chief of Staff calling to have the case transferred to the corrupt FBI. Hmmmm
     
    Last edited: Mar 26, 2019
    nopantsLance, Yankkee and Barry Cuda like this.
  9. DawnPatrol321

    DawnPatrol321 Well-Known Member

    Mar 6, 2012
    Probably because he has to play the role of the Mayor given the mound of evidence they had against him. He can't undermine the Police work and the Grand Jury from his position.
     
  10. NNYNJ

    NNYNJ Well-Known Member

    928
    Dec 22, 2017
    But why would Smollet be a positive for him? I don't see it.
    I get the Obama factor. But they cared so much about Smollet (even though he's a b-list star) I would think they would be pissed that Rahm publicly bashed him.

    I'm all for a good conspiracy, but it needs to add up to make sense
     
  11. DawnPatrol321

    DawnPatrol321 Well-Known Member

    Mar 6, 2012
    I hear you, like I said I'm not saying one way or the other that Rahm had anything to do with it. I just know this, something shady happened, there was a deal made, who all was involved remains to be seen and we may never know the truth.

    I have never trusted or believed anything Rahm Emmanuel has said in the past, so I just find it hard to find him as genuine today, although his press conference today was believable if you take out my pre-conceived notions about him.

    I am simply not closing the door on the possibility that he had something to do with this or at the very least is fine with the outcome politically. It's not out of the realm of possibility that he could have supported this behind closed doors and then publicly chastise Smollett at the same time.

    That's what you would do if you wanted to keep the attention off of you when millions of American's get pissed off that another Democrat "elite" gets preferential treatment.
     
  12. La_Piedra

    La_Piedra Well-Known Member

    Oct 9, 2017
    I'm not sure anyone cares about Smollett as much as they care about the narrative

    If an Obama interjected in the case, then it is prudent to believe the possibility of Emanuel being involved.

    Or not.

    He's kinda like Huma Abeddin is to the Clintons.

    Or Manafort to Trump.
     
    DawnPatrol321 likes this.
  13. NNYNJ

    NNYNJ Well-Known Member

    928
    Dec 22, 2017
    I agree that something shady probably happened. I just don't think Emmanuel was in on it (which also may have pissed him off).

    Normally "elite" Dem or Rep get preferential treatment.
     
  14. DawnPatrol321

    DawnPatrol321 Well-Known Member

    Mar 6, 2012
    Fair enough, neither of us really know for sure, so it's pure speculation, but at least we can agree a shady deal was made.
     
  15. Barry Cuda

    Barry Cuda Well-Known Member

    Nov 19, 2018
    Politicians logic.
    So now, given this "pardon", so to speak, Trump should immediately pardon Manafort and the entire cast of those serving him that received indictments and jail sentences.
    Immediately.
     
    nopantsLance and Yankkee like this.
  16. NNYNJ

    NNYNJ Well-Known Member

    928
    Dec 22, 2017
    Pardon Flynn... Screw Manafort. That dude sucks.
     
    La_Piedra likes this.
  17. Barry Cuda

    Barry Cuda Well-Known Member

    Nov 19, 2018
    Yup, pardon Manafort--nothing would annoy the Dems more, and that is the BEST reason to do so.
     
    nopantsLance likes this.
  18. davedingus

    davedingus Well-Known Member

    189
    Oct 11, 2017
    Hope Jussie doesn’t beat himself up over this
     
  19. nopantsLance

    nopantsLance Well-Known Member

    Aug 15, 2016
    [​IMG]
     
    La_Piedra and DawnPatrol321 like this.
  20. nopantsLance

    nopantsLance Well-Known Member

    Aug 15, 2016