Rehoboth wastewater outfall pipe

Discussion in 'Mid Atlantic' started by oceanisnotasbigaswethink, Sep 20, 2010.

  1. oceanisnotasbigaswethink

    oceanisnotasbigaswethink Well-Known Member

    46
    Sep 20, 2010
    Sorry if this is a redundant post but I dont think the first one loaded and this is time sensitive.

    On sept 21, there will be a hearing on the proposed Rehoboth Ocean outfall. They want to build a pipe to send the treated wastewater into the Rehoboth beach ocean. This is a monumental decision to be made as it will impact our ocean environment to unknown degrees. Rob Stickels (a former sussex co administrator and representative) said, "Rehoboth is a financial jewel for delaware". So why cut corners when the potential exists to ruin such a paramount place to visit?

    The delaware bay is a known migratory route for many recreational and commercial fish and provides critical spawning and feeding grounds and nursery areas for many species. Treated wastewater is known to contain large amounts of estrogen which disrupts fish development and actually causes feminization in fish. In other words, you cant reproduce without males= no more fish to catch/eat. Also, estrogen accumulates in fish fat and when you eat it.....guess what? Did someone say manboobs or worse now your kid has a man-gina. Although some Rehoboth residents would enjoy this, I think that is weird.

    Its simple to think that this hormone will only affect fish. There is more information known about the moon than there is about the delaware bay. Scientists have only begun to scratch the surface of info about the delaware bay. So to go ahead and dump there is highly irresponsible. Horseshoe crab eggs are the food that supports a variety of common, threatened, and endangered birds like the Red Knot. There is potential that estrogen could alter the reproduction of these crabs and several species of birds could go extinct.

    No farms no food-

    Land based application not only recharges groundwater but it helps protect against salt water intrusion. The more water we suck out of the ground, the more salt water intrudes into our groundwater. Sea level rise is happening now, it is proven. DNREC is putting a lot of time and energy to combat this problem and we have one way to possibly help. So to pump all this water into the ocean is a waste when it could recharge groundwater and fight intrusion at the same time. How much money will we spend on fresh water when all we get is salt water from our wells?

    Costs-

    $50 million for land based application

    $35 million for the proposed ocean outflow

    .....a difference of $15 million. Rehoboth pays $30 million to replenish the beach with sand every 3 years. I witnessed this sand get removed from the beach firsthand by one single noreaster. If one storm costs $30 million, how can we justify saving a measly $15 million. How much is our fishery worth.....$a million, a billion, a trillion? Its only worth $15 million to the people that support the outfall pipe. Gerard Esposito, Tidewater utilities executive vice president said "costs of the options have not been fully vetted and the ocean outfall is more expensive than they think". Has anyone taken into consideration that they will die in the next 50 or less years and that their decision will last longer than they live? Will our children suffer the effects of the environmental ramifications and expenses. What is $15 million in 50 years from now? I heard they are printing money like its going out of style (which it actually is). We may not have the resources in the future to just say ok we were wrong now lets fix it. Just spend the measly money while we have it.

    Rehoboth is basing their decision purely on economics and costs to Rehoboth residents based on flawed studies comparing ocean discharge to land based application. DNREC, the farm bureau, and delaware legislature have all expressed support (all based on sound science and not personal gain) for conserving freshwater, preserving farmland, and reducing unnecessary harm to the environment by supporting land based application. But money is more important than science and quality of life anymore......for some. Lets not listen to the science based organizations with nothing to gain either way, lets just listen to the people who want to save their money.

    Interesting article about pharmaceuticals found in fish near wastewater outflow.

    www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29877241/
     
  2. zach619

    zach619 Well-Known Member

    Jan 21, 2009
    I surf all winter right next to the now 4 mile long wastewater pipe in San Diego. It is terrible.

    I don't think that Deleware would have the same issues with the system that SD does, I.E. whenever it rains, which is rarely, the entire cities sewage systems get flooded. The whole system city wide hasn't been worked in since the 60s or so, so not only do all the pipe overflow, Giant debris gets caught in the turbines in the system, causing the whole system to go into emergency mode. At this point, there are 1 or 2 options. Option 1 = Let the system do its thing and the Point Loma plant would litterally overflow with human feces... Or 2, you just open the "Flood Gate" and instead of letting the partially treated sewage out, they just open the pipe and let MILLIONS of gallons of RAW waste go out into the ocean...

    And in the past, the city had to pay heafty, multi million dollar fines when doing this, because it VIOLATES THE CLEAN WATER ACT!...

    Now, with the bad economy, the crooked politicians got San Diego passed as a City who no longer has to pay the fines... So, rather than put the fines back into fixing the faulty system, they OWE NOTHING now, and let raw waste run into our ocean...

    Pretty cool...

    You guys definately dont want this.... And there is NO NEED FOR IT IN DELEWARE!!!

    That is just stupid. There is more than enough space to find alternative treatment methods and installing new plants.

    Using the Chesapeake Bay, the DW Bay, or the Atlantic should be ABSOLUTELY out of the question....

    I mean, PEOPLE ARE FU**ING NUTS!!! I mean, do you really have to be a surfer to get pissed off about this. Even if I never got in the ocean, I would understand why this sounds so AS$ backwards...

    Good luck. Everyone should show up and vote. But let me tell you, Money talks, so the fact that you are already voting on it makes it too late. The crooked local politicians are already in bed with whoever is funding this, so its too late. They will let you all voice your opinions, and in the end, they will do what is best for all the local busniess' pockets.

    Its jsut CRAZY to me how all the hotels and local businesses in the midatlantic totally disregard the environmental issues surrounding their facilities. WHY DO THEY THINK PEOPLE COME THERE!!!! Not for their sh**y hotel. ITS FOR THE OCEAN!!!! NO OCEAN, NO BUSINESS....

    Do we really have to relive the Jersey Shore?statin Island incident in the 80s and watch the local beach economies tank again....

    COME ON PEOPLE!!! THOSE SAND PUMPING PIPES ARE UGLY ENOUGH....

    ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!@
     

  3. zach619

    zach619 Well-Known Member

    Jan 21, 2009
    ohh boy, I cant wait to surf North OC MD in years to come. When there is a nice South Drift coming down the DE coast, I will duck dive and come up with a mouthful of someone else's dingleberries!!! Awesome. Can't wait.
     
  4. EJsurfnfish

    EJsurfnfish Active Member

    28
    Dec 16, 2007
    The Center for the Inland Bays is against the land based application of the treated sludge as it will just leach into the inland bays and increase the problems of high bacteria and nutrient overload. I say build the pipe.
     
  5. zach619

    zach619 Well-Known Member

    Jan 21, 2009
    Yeah, so instead of the inland bays having higher bacteria levels, it will be assawoman bay, the DE bay and the entire continental shelf will be over run with high bacteria levels... If you think that in the summer, when the water is warm, and super flat, the the slow leak of millions of gallons of "partially treated sewage" a few miles off your coast will not increase bacteria levels is just not true.

    Look at the coastal water surrounding any of the sweage pipes that are already built in the ocean. They shut down my local beaches at least twice a year because of the RIDICULOUSLY high bacteria levels.

    So, damned if you do, damned if you dont. But dont let your local governement take the easy way out. They are paid to be in office. THEIR JOB is to solve the people problems, and when they give you a solution that could potentially harm our coastal waters, you must oppose it.

    You know what, it will save tax payers money in the long run if you build the pipe. The MAJORITY of citizens in the state will benefit from it, but at what cost. At what point to you just have to put your foot down and say, money doesnt matter when it comes to the ocean.

    Just like we all thought it was a great ideal to drill off shore.

    Once they have a malfunction, and the DE coast is shut down for 2 weeks because its filled with human sh**, you wont agree with them.

    There is NOTHING beneficial about this for the environment. Nothing at all. It is all negative, so I find it difficult to support it in any way
     
  6. oceanisnotasbigaswethink

    oceanisnotasbigaswethink Well-Known Member

    46
    Sep 20, 2010
    Rehoboth is under a court order from the EPA to cease the land based application currently in use as it is causing high bacteria and nutrient overload. They apply the wastewater onto fields adjacent to the lewes and rehoboth canal with no real buffers to filter out these bacteria and nutrients. If the right system is employed, the buffers can significantly reduce these harmful bacteria and nutrients. If you pump into the ocean there is no buffer to soak up these bacteria and nutrients.

    Hint- surfrider foundation is opposed to the ocean outfall pipe. The guy from wilmington says build the pipe. I know a guy from PA who has a house in Rehoboth and he is going to the meeting in favor of the pipe.
    A smart guy once said.....
    "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction."

    Do you have a vested interest in the ocean?

    "human being is a part of a whole, called by us _universe_, a part limited in time and space. He experiences himself, his thoughts and feelings as something separated from the rest... a kind of optical delusion of his consciousness. This delusion is a kind of prison for us, restricting us to our personal desires and to affection for a few persons nearest to us. Our task must be to free ourselves from this prison by widening our circle of compassion to embrace all living creatures and the whole of nature in its beauty."
    Einstein
     
  7. zach619

    zach619 Well-Known Member

    Jan 21, 2009
    Im not a DE resident, so I really don't have a voice, but I am a MD native and frequent the OC coast all the time. It would be a shame if the entire tri-state area had to suffer because of DE government. Im just speaking as a citizen of a state and of a city that has one of these pipes. And it has been nothing but heart break with the pipe.

    Back in 2007, THE ENTIRE LOBSTER AND SHELL FISH POPULATION was damaged and rendered POISIONOUS. THE ENTIRE 80 mile stretch of coast was RUINED. No shellfish of the local SD seafloor was sold or eaten. It destroyed local fisherman. Destroyed them....

    Im not a fisherman by trade, or for money. But I LOVE paddling out on the reefs and dropping lobster nets and enjoying seafood. The entire fishing community in SD was rocked by this.

    So, this is a topic that probably didnt even make national news over in the mid-atlantic.

    But surfers couldnt surf in OB/MD/PB/IB for weeks. I had to drive up to San Onofre to surf for weeks.

    Its just bad for business... trust me when I tell you.

    So, the city had to pay 2 million dollars, but they leaked like 480 MILLION gallons of raw waste, the accumulated on our Reefs, on our piers, on our jetties and KILLED OUR ANIMALS... KILLED them.

    You would be duck diving and dead lobster carcuses are hitting you in the face under water. You get out of the water, 2 months after the sewage spill, and you are still stepping on old discarded lobster shells.... DEATH DEATH DEATH.... from your lovely pipe.

    Look past your own local propoganda and media to find the truth... Cause they are selling you guys right up the river....
     
  8. El Porto

    El Porto Well-Known Member

    151
    Dec 28, 2007
    Don't Ocean City and South Bethany already have ocean outfall pipes for treated wastewater? http://capegazette.com/storiescurrent/200912/reho-wastewater15.html
     
  9. oceanisnotasbigaswethink

    oceanisnotasbigaswethink Well-Known Member

    46
    Sep 20, 2010
    Yes, two big mistakes right there. First you have three outfalls, then four, etc. The human population is growing exponentially. Its not going to stop at the Rehoboth outfall. They will keep putting them in until.......what happens. That is the question. Were not saying that land based application is the key but that it is determined to be the better option through sound science. Its a collection of Universities, governing agencies, scientists, and scholars that study this and say.....we can do this and save a bunch of money and see what happens......or......lets take a step back and do it right. The main issue at hand is time. The court order gives a cutoff date to stop current LBA practices. Rehoboth is trying to get the ball rolling so when the time comes they are not stuck without wastewater treatment facilities. We all know whos interest the city of Rehoboth has in mind......its not surfers or the people that use the beach everyday. They are geared towards tourists. Tourists=money. No amount of money can buy our ocean back!!!
     
  10. SkegLegs

    SkegLegs Well-Known Member

    513
    Feb 8, 2009
    The problems Zach speaks of are from discharge during overloads, because many cities have sewer and stormwater combined. During a big rain event, they system cannot treat the combined flows, and bypass the treatment process and directly discharge. This results in raw untreated sewage making it into the ocean. The Rehoboth outfall is completely independant of stormwater, and handles just sewage flow. All of the water will be treated to levels deemed safe by the EPA to discharge into small inland waterways (i.e. rivers, bays), let alone an ocean. I guarantee you the "treated" water coming out of the end of that pipe will be cleaner than what is coming out of our tax ditches and rivers into the inland bays after agriculture run-off.

    I surf right where they propose the pipe to discharge offshore and have absolutely no issue with it. As for the untreated stormwater that discharges from the pond behind the henlopen into the ocean at Grenoble street though....I do have a problem with that.

    Instead of screaming wolf, do a little due diligence. Whereever this water is discharged, it will eventually end up in the ocean. And we are talking about treated effluent...not raw sewage.

    And the groundwater recharge arguement was taken based on application in arid regions like California. Do you actually live in Delaware? Have you seen what happens after an inch of rain. Groundwater is one resource we have more than enough of....Our soils are so oversaturated, none of the application will infiltrate, it's going to simply runoff into the smaller inland streams and ditches, where what remaining concentrations in the effluent will have a greater effect because of the smaller water source.
     
  11. EJsurfnfish

    EJsurfnfish Active Member

    28
    Dec 16, 2007
    Ocean, if you want to have an intelligent debate please stop with the doomsday scenarios and propaganda. This guy from Wilmington does have a vested interest in the ocean. Every weekday I can get off work and every weekend I'm either surfing, spearfishing the outer wall or fishing off my kayak. I'll have more time to debate when I get off of work.

    One more thing, do we all have to do whatever surfrider tells us to do just because we surf? They're the ones that support MLPA's in California that shut down huge swaths of coastline to watermen and spearos. But you already know that because you probably support MLPA's on the east coast too. I can't wait until my membership expires.
     
  12. SkegLegs

    SkegLegs Well-Known Member

    513
    Feb 8, 2009
    EJ, you better watch your words about the surfrider. You do realize if Rastavich gets word of this thread he's going to paddle a kayak across the Atlantic, up the Delaware river, into the Christina, and then show up on your doorstep and beat with with a mallet made of whalebone, wrapped in Dolphin foreskin.
     
  13. El Porto

    El Porto Well-Known Member

    151
    Dec 28, 2007
    I hear you brah, just pointng out that Zach is clueless to act as if Rehoboth is the first place in the region that will use an ocean outfall pipe when in fact OC has had one for 30 years.
     
  14. OBlove

    OBlove Well-Known Member

    380
    Aug 29, 2006
    why did you leave?


    not busting your balls, but why did you leave MD. you speak with alot of passion about it and you probally could be a major activist back home since trouble lurks on our horizon and SD has gone to Sh!t...literally! or are you just throwing in 10 cents cause your board. I don't know much about the situation, but I will do my best to help it. i live on the water and i am in the water all the time. i always thought cali had to many issues to leave the east and i love it hear. just curious...
     
  15. oceanisnotasbigaswethink

    oceanisnotasbigaswethink Well-Known Member

    46
    Sep 20, 2010
    Just to clarify,

    We all have a vested interest in the ocean no matter where you live. We get Oxygen, food, recreation, etc from it.

    This treated wastewater is not in any way like the raw sewage discharge that other states have to deal with. There will not be any logs floating in the lineup. The treated waste water nutrient/bacteria load is low if not nonexistant. So yes the water is somewhat "clean". Although it is laden with trace elements like hormones (estrogen) and compounds (pharmaceuticals) that cant be removed with current technology.

    I cant say that the runoff from LBA wont impact the inland bays. Take a look at Google earth and see what borders the inland bays. Green lawns, agriculture, golf courses. What do you think the nutrient load coming off these areas does to the inland bays?

    It is a flawed system, no doubt. We just need to make informed decisions not based on the money we want to save. Money is nice, but quality of life is better I assure you.

    I trust the Department of Natural resources and environmental control (DNREC), Surfrider Foundation, The state expert on Hydrogeology, The University of Delaware, NRCS, The Farm Service Agency, NOAA, and my gut feeling. Not the city of Rehoboth.
     
  16. Swellinfo

    Swellinfo Administrator

    May 19, 2006
    Well said.
     
  17. fallingsky

    fallingsky Well-Known Member

    90
    Jul 24, 2008
    Both have pros and cons

    Both have pros and cons.

    Land Application does have a limits lifetime and is mostly determined by the amount of heavy metals and pollution parameters already existing in the soils and taking that into consideration it is calculated the lifetime of the spray area for what is in the wastewater and how many years it takes to reach the limits. Land application will not have the amount of treatment that the ocean outfall will have. So dirtyier water will be discharged on the ground and will seep into the groundwater and the inland bays. If the water is treated to high levels then there are no nutrients in the water for the crops and stuff to use so then it is almost pointless to spray.

    Ocean Outfall will be treated to a high level of treatment. I am not sure what levels they are proposing but will be a max of BOD 10, TSS 10, TN 10 but hopefully will be BOD 5, TSS 5 TN 10 Fecal <200. Drinking water standards are 10, 10, 10. The technology is here that will do this treatment consistantly but I am not sure in this instance what they are proposing. The bad thing with municipal systems on an outfall is that if there is a burp in the treatment process it goes into the water. A big mess and I would prefer not to take the chances. Sewer and stormwater in Rehoboth are separate systems but in big rains the sewer system does get overloaded fast so unless they resolve this issue it will remain an issue and will discharge crappy water into the ocean.
     
  18. EJsurfnfish

    EJsurfnfish Active Member

    28
    Dec 16, 2007
    First off Ocean I have nothing against you personally. When I first heard about the proposed pipe I, just like most surfers, thought it was a bad idea until I researched it more and thought about the alternatives. If you love the ocean and the inland bays than I think the lesser of the two evils is to build the outfall pipe. Also, I own no land or property in Rehoboth, I'm not employed by the city of Rehoboth. I work for an environmental consulting company that is not involved with this issue at all. Basically I have no money to gain from this proposal.


    1. Technology is proven and a best bet for the particulars of Rehoboth Beach. Ocean City Maryland and the South Coastal Waste Water Treatment Plant (with its outfall near South Bethany) both discharge treated wastewater to the ocean with zero problems for 20+ years. In fact South Coastal has even received an EPA award for its excellence in operation.

    2. Ocean outfall works because the highly treated wastewater is diluted rapidly by the mass of the ocean. Think about the tiny volume of the effluent versus the gigantic mass of the ocean with all its currents.

    3. Add that to the fact that the Delaware estuary discharges right there and is one of the most nutrient enriched bodies of water in the world. We don't notice this because its naturally turbid.

    4. The only documented environmental affects of outfalls on the ocean communities is a localized increased in plankton biomass, maybe some more fish. There's no evidence that marine animals will become stressed or diseased from the outflow pipe.

    5. The treatment plant maintains storage area so that if there is a problem at the plant they can store water and will not be pumping untreated effluent.

    6. The alternative is to pump to water miles inland and dispose of it into our drinking water aquifers that also feed the inland bays. Rehoboth bay gets much of its freshwater inputs from groundwater. While the treated wastewater might meet drinking water standards for nitrogen when its pumped into the ground, it can ruin the bays. Phosphorus is another issue because it can accumulate in the soil until the soil can't hold any more and it leaches out. Wastewater disposal on land is not yet a perfect technology.

    7. Landbased disposal costs hundreds of dollars more per person per year than ocean outfall. Why? Because land at the beach is at a premium and so they have to pipe it way the hell out. Those dollars can be spent as they wish be people who earn them. Maybe they would want to put them towards restoring the inland bays.

    8. The Bays are still moderately to highly polluted by excess nitrogen and phosphorus. Rehoboth Bay used to have clear water and be nearly half covered by sea grass meadows. Now the seagrasses are all gone so are the oysters and the oxygen is unhealthy for the young fish that want to use it for a nursery so they can grow in to big fish we catch. During summer mornings oxygen levels in the tributaries regularly drop to lethal levels for fish. Wastewater disposed of on land goes to the inland bays where dilution is much much less than the ocean.

    9. But what about the freshwater? isn't global warming going to deplete our aquifers and aren't we throwing away all this resource? The Columbia aquifer has insane capacity and it refills itself every winter with rainwater. Climate change is not predicted to increase or decrease total annual rainfall in the Mid-Atlantic. We do not live in the Northeast where increases are predicted, we do not live in the Southeast where dercreases have been predicted.

    10. Finally this is not California or New Jersey.

    11. The only possible outstanding issue that I've heard of is the modeling of the currents at the discharge. From what I understand the screening level analysis was fine but they might need to do more work to ensure that unacceptable amounts of the treated effluent will not be carried near the shore. If this info is correct I'm assuming this is part of the process, if the impact study finds the levels to be unacceptable then it obviously can't be done. Nobody wants to dive head first into a floating brown snake.

    Also, you said we know more about the moon than the Delaware Bay. Do you really believe that? Seriously? There have been a ton of studies done in the Bay.


    Ed
     
    Last edited: Sep 21, 2010
  19. zach619

    zach619 Well-Known Member

    Jan 21, 2009
    We dont need any MORE! That is the point. Did I say Rehobeth was giong to be the first pipe? If you are going to call me, please don't misquote me. I said nothing of the sort. The idea was bad 30 years ago in OC.

    How about the people of deleware learn from the mistakes that MD already made. I mean sh**, whats your point? A bad pipe is a bad pipe.
     
  20. zach619

    zach619 Well-Known Member

    Jan 21, 2009
    I left for the surf. just like everyone else. Everyone is aware that the state of CA is broke and all those things, but day to day, we as citizens dont see that. We have jobs. We have drinking water. Our toilets flush. Its whatever. But as a surfer, I am able to surf everyday here, all year. Which is why ive been here 8 years. Do I plan on moving back? Yes. I haev had my eyes on getting back to OC MD or VB for years, but guess what, the housing there is over prices too. There are no jobs there either. Everything, everywhere has problems right now, and if the economy were better and housing wasnt still bloated along the coast, I would be living back in OC MD. Not because of the surf, but because of family and other things in life that are important....

    But thats my point, although I technically live out here, I visit home many times each year and i love nothing more than scoring a nice swell in OC. And in the future, I will most likely have rugrats running up and down the boardwalk, and I will be out in the lineup right next to you. So, I still have a vested interest, but at the same time, yeah, i was bored and gave you my 10 cents....