Creepy? or ciminal?

Discussion in 'All Discussions' started by HARDCORESHARTHUFFER-RI, Dec 13, 2013.

  1. Paddington Jetty Bear

    Paddington Jetty Bear Well-Known Member

    Apr 23, 2013
    Dude, who is complaining aboot their "failures" or saying they are "discontented." America has treated me pretty well so far......

    "The easy way out?" The easy way out of what? Why do you have this belief that every non-republican is lazy and collects welfare. Most of the people living below the poverty level work long, long hours......They have jobs. Conservative states receive the most federal welfare in this country.

    Dude, please, no Fox "News" terms like "Class Warfare" Awww, the poor rich. They have it so bad.

    Class warfare is sitting around watching the poor get poorer, and the rich getting richer, while the middle class dies....That's class warfare....

    Yeah, when the industrial revolution kicked in, those fat cats at the top just treated their workers swell. You can't have a society based on the middle and lower classes being subservient and held hostage to the desires of a few at the top. That's ridiculous. Most CEO's have absolutely no morals or compassion for anything or anybody.

    I don't respect most CEO's because I don't believe most of them do much at all. Most of them were born into the whole deal. Salaries are declining and it has nothing to do with competition......nothing at all.

    Anyways thanks for your opinions, Hinmo, try and snag a few at The Dock tomorrow....or where ever you go. God save the queen.......
     
  2. hinmo24t

    hinmo24t Well-Known Member

    412
    Jan 16, 2012
    yeah man, no prob, we see it differently. thanks, tomorrow im hoping to get out there def. hope you score too.
     

  3. chicharronne

    chicharronne Well-Known Member

    Jun 22, 2006
    The weird part of the "Class Warfare" is that the powerful are accusing the powerless. they get the racist poor to agree to cutting "entitlements" by saying is because it's the Muslim that's instigating it. My friends daughter moved to Texas from OBX. She's my wifes "friend" on facebook. She posts that she needs to get food and hopes someone will give her a ride. Then celebrates that SC is refusing to give their citizens affordable health care. Her dad is soon to lose his house because her mom just died after a long (expensive) battle with cancer. The insurnce co cut them off due to reaching their life time limit.
     
  4. goosemagoo

    goosemagoo Well-Known Member

    900
    May 20, 2011
    We're going to continue to have lagging middle class until we can figure out an effective way to even out the payroll of publicly traded companies. If a CEO only gets 45 million of the payroll pie instead of the usual 50 million that leaves enough $ to give 500 managers a $10,000 raise which will definitely have a much greater impact on our society than whatever the CEO would've done with the extra 5 mil.

    That goes against all of my libertarian leanings but I don't see any other way out of this mess.
     
  5. brewengineer

    brewengineer Well-Known Member

    Jun 22, 2011
    Yes. Yes. Thank you.
     
  6. Paddington Jetty Bear

    Paddington Jetty Bear Well-Known Member

    Apr 23, 2013
    Wow, look at these two last posts......people with f'ing sense.......and sense of right and wrong........of decency.....

    Well, I'll be damned.
     
  7. HARDCORESHARTHUFFER-RI

    HARDCORESHARTHUFFER-RI Well-Known Member

    Sep 17, 2013
    While I agree in theory with the above posters, you cant make laws to force a distribution of cash. Using force to distribute wealth is amoral

    if you dont like a corpos policy in paying the CEO, dont buy their prodcuts. vote with your wallet, so simple even an idiot can do it
     
  8. brewengineer

    brewengineer Well-Known Member

    Jun 22, 2011
    You will eventually buy the products that put millions in the pocket of some CEO. That is, unless you are going Amish. Then again, they use some manufactured goods as well.
     
  9. HARDCORESHARTHUFFER-RI

    HARDCORESHARTHUFFER-RI Well-Known Member

    Sep 17, 2013
    I agree pump, consumer society is very intertwined......voting with the wallet is all that is left, use it as much as you can while you can.
     
  10. goosemagoo

    goosemagoo Well-Known Member

    900
    May 20, 2011
    Which will never happen because the CEO is beholden to the shareholders. It is his duty to maximize shareholder value. But, there has to be a way to gently threaten a corporate arm twisting unless the low guy on the totem pole receives a certain percentage of the pie.

    What if the corp. tax rate was raised by 15% for any company that doesn't meet a particular ratio for the entirety of their payroll? The shareholders will loose out on that amount of income therefore creating a situation where the CEO IS NOT acting in their best interests.

    Gov't: "Sure you can pay your assistant peanuts while you sip cocktails on your 42 million dollar yacht, docked at your private island. But, since we will need to give tax dollars to your assistant so she can keep a roof over her head we're going to tax the crap out of your chest of gold."

    While it's not a well thought out or researched proposal I think it shows what I'm getting at.
     
  11. HARDCORESHARTHUFFER-RI

    HARDCORESHARTHUFFER-RI Well-Known Member

    Sep 17, 2013
    sorry, Market has spoken, they (shareholders and consumers) deem the CEO to be some high priest capable of financial wizardry to make a good product and be efficient maximizing profits. His wizardry makes him worth big bucks

    if you dont like it, dont try and fix an un-fixable, broken system, build a new better system. its the only way

    taxing them will make them go offshore, see if it doesnt

    If I was going to make a system Id start with one thing for sure: corporations ARE NOT PEOPLE. Only a false statement of law of the governments makes an unaccountable entity a person
     
    Last edited: Dec 16, 2013
  12. brewengineer

    brewengineer Well-Known Member

    Jun 22, 2011
    I like that idea. No excessive tax unless you get greedy.
     
  13. HARDCORESHARTHUFFER-RI

    HARDCORESHARTHUFFER-RI Well-Known Member

    Sep 17, 2013
    define greedy. I mean I have a few dozen wives and they all want bling, otherwise I cant get my groove on.
    I am obviously playing devils advocate here, but assigning a quantity to a qualifying word is random weird slippery slope
     
  14. brewengineer

    brewengineer Well-Known Member

    Jun 22, 2011
    I doubt they will go off-shore. They will probably just increase the goods cost to make up for the extra tax. Something does need to be done. There is no way to know what will really work.
     
  15. HARDCORESHARTHUFFER-RI

    HARDCORESHARTHUFFER-RI Well-Known Member

    Sep 17, 2013
    pretty much true, I think removing regulation and corporate personhood would be a good start.
    corporations should be held accountable for their actions (Bhopal anyone?)
    I know this seems contradictory, however letting them run their internal affairs while making sure common goods (air water, soil, etc) are not destroyed is crucial to a sustainable society

    enforcing the commons not being destroyed is a sticky wicket and I have no easy answers
     
    Last edited: Dec 16, 2013
  16. brewengineer

    brewengineer Well-Known Member

    Jun 22, 2011
    Obviously, I was just making a vague statement to simply the idea behind goose's suggestion. In the real world, there would probably be a set of standards, as we have with the current income tax system. Greed, at least in my opinion, describes the situations where execs are paying themselves salaries at the top of the standard scale, while paying the regular blue and white collar workers at the bottom of the standard scale.
     
  17. brewengineer

    brewengineer Well-Known Member

    Jun 22, 2011
    As an engineer working in the corporate world for almost 10 years now, I can tell you there is no way to remove regulations without harming the world around those corporations. There is no accountability at the top, and they already work within many gray areas. You would be surprised at the things they get away with now.
     
  18. HARDCORESHARTHUFFER-RI

    HARDCORESHARTHUFFER-RI Well-Known Member

    Sep 17, 2013