Cultural Marxism

Your just scum brah, 1 step above a rapist. You are a sellout and traitor of the highest order. In a past life you must of been the guy putting people on trains because the government is your daddy.

Fungus is saying the holocaust is a good thing because the machine that is government comes before humans.

You are pure scum and I hope your students aren't as stupid as you and reconise your totalitarianism as the mass slaughter of humans it is. F you

 

He's the type of cuck that would walk in on his wife banging some random guy and hand the guy a condom

 

this dumb ***** keeps doubling down on stoopid!
https://twitter.com/ABC/status/870675282306322432/video/1

 

She apologizes, then rationalizes her deplorable behavior, then follows that up by pointing her nasty little sausages at the entire Trump family...which basically negates her apology.

What a stupid ignorant khunt

 

ur a school teacher ?lol that's pretty cool.
I never said good teachers lol,i said cool teachers but yea ur right they weren't good teachers because they let u do whatever u want instead of teaching.

u sound like a cool teach if kids want to come to ur classes.best thing for kids is getting a hobby or something they want to do,like extra curricular activites if that's what its called,after school programs like football or whatever.
I admit I was a bad kid lol,where I grew up there wasn't any after school specials we could afford,there was no playgrounds,basically no safe haven for kids.so we smoked weed,drank,random acts of mischief just to pass the time.

lol heres a random day from my early teens.very first thing u did when u got off the school bus was everyone putting their money together to go buy some reefer.like 8 kids all chippin in 2$ 3$ lol to get 20$ bag.we'd smoke,play hackey sack for 2 hours then skate the rest of the day.

as I'm older now I see the difference,my nephew is going to be 18,sh1t this month thinking about it.he's a good kid,doesnt smoke or drink or any bad stuff like that ,he works,doesnt get in trouble,basically an ideal teenager.i tell my brother he did real good raising him because I was when I was his age I got into so much trouble.caught my first felony at 12 yrs old hanging with the wrong crowd.

crazy thing is everyone thinks my brother was the 1 good kid out of the family,but the truth is he was the fastest runner out of all of us and he just never got caught.them days are long gone tho,once I turned 18 and started living on my own I had to fly straight,no more stupid stuff,thats what si is four

 

Fungus is the faculty member that dresses like a drag queen and teaches your kids gender fluidity. Hey Fungus do you also like to expose yourself in the little girls room, too, and call the girl a bigot when she complains about being shown a grown man's *****.

The School system needs to be boycotted, if my kid gets straight A's he will be grounded.

 

wtf

This is female policy, without question. Academia being run straight into the ground by bitter, nasty older over-edumacated angry cuuuunts.

 

Opinion Best of the Web

Surveillance in the Obama Era
Senator describes another potential abuse of intelligence powers, media yawns.
Then-President Barack Obama at the White House in December of 2015.
Then-President Barack Obama at the White House in December of 2015. Photo: nicholas kamm/Agence France-Presse/Getty Images
By James Freeman
June 5, 2017 1:32 p.m. ET
WSJ

How far did the Obama Administration go in collecting intelligence on Americans, including members of the political opposition? This question has aroused little curiosity in much of the press corps or among Democratic politicians like Rep. Adam Schiff, who used to at least pretend they were concerned about government monitoring of telephone networks. But for citizens who still care about such potential threats to liberty, there was interesting news on Friday.

Specifically, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R., S.C.) said during an appearance on Fox News:

I have reason to believe that a conversation that I had was picked up with some foreign leader or some foreign person and somebody requested that my conversation be unmasked. I’ve been told that by people in the intelligence community. All I can say is that there are 1,950 collections on American citizens talking to people that were foreign agents being surveilled either by the CIA, the FBI or the NSA. Here’s the concern: Did the people in the Obama Administration listen in to these conversations? Was there a politicizing of the intelligence gathering process? So what I want to know: Of the 1,950 incidental collections on American citizens, how many of them involved presidential candidates, members of Congress from either party and if these conversations were unmasked, who made the request? Because I want to know everything there is about unmasking, how it works and who requested unmasking of conversations between foreign people and American members of Congress.

Mr. Graham added that he does not know if he was in fact unmasked. But he made clear that he intends to learn the extent of the executive branch’s surveillance of him:

...I’ve sent a letter to the NSA, to the FBI and the CIA requesting any collection on Lindsey Graham. Now if you’ve got a reason to believe that a member of Congress is committing a crime, then you go get a warrant to follow us around like you would any other citizen. But I meet with foreign leaders all the time. And I would be upset if any executive branch agency listened in on my conversations, because I’m in another branch of government.

Sen. Rand Paul (R., Ky.) has been saying for a while that two reporters have told him that he too was surveilled by the Obama Administration, according to the journalists’ sources within government. And then last month Mr. Paul said, also on Fox News, that a Senate colleague had confided that he believed he was also surveilled by the Obama Administration. Today a spokesman for Sen. Paul tells this column that the Kentuckian was referring to Sen. Graham and adds:

Senator Rand Paul remains very concerned about potential abuses committed by the Obama administration that led to members of congress being surveilled or unmasked. He has discussed potential legislative reforms with Senator Graham on preventing the executive branch from spying on the legislative branch in the future.

 

That’s fine to consider sensible legislation, but first let’s find out if the existing laws have been followed. Along with Messrs. Graham and Paul, the Trump campaign and the Trump transition team were swept up in the net of Obama-era intelligence collection. Mr. Graham, Mr. Paul and of course Mr. Trump were all competitors in seeking the 2016 Republican presidential nomination. All of this raises the question: which Republican presidential candidates in 2016 were not surveilled?

There are other questions, as Mr. Graham noted. How many times and why were the identities of Americans unmasked, and in each case who ordered the unmasking? These questions have special relevance after the issuance of subpoenas on Wednesday by the House Intelligence Committee. As a Journal editorial noted:

The new subpoenas seek details of all unmasking requests in 2016 by three people: former National Security Adviser Susan Rice, former CIA Director John Brennan, and former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power. Democrats claim Ms. Rice needed to unmask names to do her job, though this is questionable given that she wasn’t running counterintelligence investigations. They have a better claim with Mr. Brennan.

But Ms. Power’s job was diplomacy. Unmaskings are supposed to be rare, and if the mere ambassador to the U.N. could demand them, what privacy protection was the Obama White House really offering U.S. citizens? The House subpoenas should provide fascinating details about how often Ms. Power and her mates requested unmaskings, on which Trump officials, and with what justification. The public deserves to know given that unmasked details have been leaked to the press in violation of the law and privacy.

Meantime, we learned from Circa News last week of a declassified document from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, which excoriated the National Security Agency for an “institutional lack of candor.” The court explained that Obama officials had often violated U.S. privacy protections while looking at foreign intelligence but did not disclose these incidents until the waning days of Mr. Obama’s tenure.

Not that it’s easy, even now, for consumers of news to understand when exactly these violations occurred. The New York Times , for example, has managed to run at least two recent stories that described Obama-era abuses of intelligence powers without ever mentioning the word “Obama.”

 

It'll be difficult to pick up the ball and run with those allegations because it would take an extraordinary amount of investigative journalism, and we all know that the leading fishwrap in this country won't touch it unless it implicates the GOP.

If one of the few conservative rags ran with it, the MSM would do its best to call it "fake news" and delegitimize it.

One can only hope though

 

Succinctly said & spot-on, Keed.....unfortunately, truth & accountability for our public / elected 'leaders' takes it in the shorts yet againe.

 

If only the WSJ would step out of their comfort zone and step up to the plate.

Then, and only then, would prudent critical thinkers realize that there is a kernel of truth about wtf went on for 8 years under the previous administration.

 

all my fellow new joyzians,if yall could go out and vote for phil murphy tomorrow that would be great.i been listening on the radio about how when Christie is out, nj will become like Colorado as far as reefer.whether ur a democrat or republican,just think wtf did Christie ever do for us?so vote a guy in that will actually do something

all I know is every single Christie speech I ever seen,kim guadagno is nodding off/dozing off in the background.don't believe go check youtube for the state of emergency speeches for hurricane sandy lol

 

Yes.

WSJ still has too many flacks 'writing' what sounds like pay-to-play bits.

 

When you can't oppress someone any longer you teach them to oppress themselves

 

You are wrong clownface!!! Boarders divide hate!!