Not even close. If they owned the road and beach, and then charged for access to both, then yeah that would be a capitalist "controlled by private owners" approach to parking issues and neighborhood enhancement. They want government controls to set the market. Nice try.
The market for what? Parking passes. Sorry - you're definitely right. My bad. They're definitely not using the local government to increase the value of their properties by keeping people out. The rate for parking is definitely not incidental to the actual goal. My bad, chief.
Perfect description! The men look like a bunch of p ssies. They think they are the superior race based on what they are taught. I still haven't seen one decent surfer out of the bunch. People tend to forget about the money laundering that has happened multiple times in this community and their real locale Brooklyn. The same people were also involved in real estate fraud and organ trafficking all investigated by the FBI and covered by the MSM.
LOL. Locals and even beachfront homeowners don't own the beach and by the law the public is required access to the public beach. I live in a town very close to the ocean but I would never limit the public from accessing the beach. The bennys annoy me but it is still their right to go to the beach. The kicker is that they are actually bennys who are trying to restrict access and not true locals.
No, I doubt having your own private beach by restricting access would increase your home value, lmao.
Sounded to me like the people trying to get this through are the rich not really sephardic dudes from syria who buy their kids ferraris when they're 17, and whose kids bully the maid. Or are the other poasters wrong? If all those other poasters are right, why do you think these rich dudes are doing it? Because they paid good hard-laundered money for those beachfront mansions, chief. They want to enjoy the flups out of them with their people, and they've bought the right to do so. Why? Because they paid more than you to be there! And money is all that matters in capitalism, chief. Sure, us poor folk have a right to be on the beach on paper, but if they can keep us out and increase the value that they get out of their property, capitalism says that's not just A-OK, but the right thing to do. In a purely capitalist society, the market controls the rate for access to everything. So just like everything else, the beach goes to the highest bidder. And that's these Syrian refugee rich dudes.
I definitely recommend you avoid real estate as a profession if you really believe that, chief. Just tryin' to help.
This has nothing to do with capitalism, if anything it's socialism, by using the government to restrict access to public property for special interests.( Play the race card or risk losing this fight )
Oh right... because "using the government" to achieve a goal automatically makes it socialism. Particularly when it's restricting access to something (which increases its value). Why am I always so wrong about this stuff??? Sorry, chief. As usual, I'm a flupsing moron for thinking that capitalists use the government to achieve goals ALL THE FLUPSING TIME! In fact, Donald Trump must be a flupsing socialist because he used the tax system (flups, man... that's using the government, right?) to make more money! That flupsing socialist!!! And yeah, I thought socialism was about sharing stuff and opening up access for everyone, but you're probably right since you're such a smart dude. And yeah, socialism is definitely not ALL ABOUT public ownership of stuff. FLUPS ME! You're so flupsing smart!
I'm with you chief, taxes blow harder than your mom. I'm working through mine right now. But you said "using the government" and I'm pretty sure using the tax system to pay less taxes qualifies. When lobbying groups work to change the tax code to benefit corporations, I'm pretty sure that's using the government to increase value for shareholders. That's exactly what these homeowners are doing by lobbying for higher taxes on beach access. Using the government to increase value doesn't always mean raising taxes and it doesn't always mean lowering - it's dependent on the situation, chief. But it's still using the government. To a true capitalist like our geriatric friend from NH, the government is just another tool to be used to increase value/profit. And when you're using the government to restrict access to something, you're most definitely raising the value of that thing. It's basic supply and demand, chief. If you can make it harder to get something (reducing supply) and there's enough demand for that thing, the price goes up. Doesn't matter if it's beach access in Deal or a flupsing avocado. Make sense, chief? I know I'm stoopid and all, but trying to help here.
Using lobbying groups to change the tax code for corporations is just special interest groups tweaking a socialist system. Just because corporations are involved does not make it pure capitalism. Remember the federal reserve is a private company that serves a part capitalist, part socialist agenda. And if you call me chief 1 more time I'm going to take my d*ck out of your mom's tookus and paint your lips brown with it.
Look chief, I might be worried if you had a ****. But let's not go there - 3rd grade name calling won't learn you any economics, chief. And using lobbying groups to change the tax code is capitalist as flups, chief. I need to abandonne and go get a few things done right now. While I'm gone, read up on capitalism, chief. Explain to me how changing the tax code to increase profits is anything other than capitalism. Take that big flupsing brain out of your own tookus, chief, and teach us all about capitalism and economics! Don't get lonely, chief. I'll be back.
Me too. I was actually gonna compliment him on that. And as for calling you chief, chief, what about Lucy? Our geriatric capitalist friend from NH knows what I mean when I say: Lucy, you got some 'splainin to do. Ok, time to abandonne for real.
