Not at all, I answer each post logically, truthfully (and more politely than some) as they come up. .
Contraction there don't you think? How can you LET someone ride the board anyway when you had no knowledge of him riding the board until after the fact? Saying that it was available to all does not cover this contraction. By saying you LET him ride it, it implies you knew beforehand. So which is it Bucko?
Nature (God) works in dynamic ways. Its humans who work in mysterious ways - usually motivated by the accrual of land and gold. But you are familiar with those mysterious ways, arent you? I'm still waiting on the material costs and time of labor to figure out your profit margin. You havent offered that up yet. also - for 1,400,000 you could have 14,000 white surf helmets, or 6,222 red wetsuits.
I'm not sure what your point is. What I was saying is that a poster here stated that Randy rode the board at my request. This is not correct, I did not request that Randy ride the board he decided to do so without asking me... which is fine but is not the same as me asking him to ride the board. I said that I had no contact with Randy until after he rode the board, I did not say that I had no knowledge that he was intending to ride the board. I knew that he was intending to do so because the person who was looking after the board told me so. You should improve your reading comprehension. .
You're talking in circles, you know exactly what I meant. You stated that you LET him ride the board anyway did you not? By stating that, you are implying that you gave him permission, which couldn't be possible if he did so without your knowledge, as stated also. You can't have it both ways. Either you LET him ride the board, or he took it upon himself, can't be both. Therefore you contradicted yourself. Just pointing out your flawed argument. That is all.
You are confused. There is no contradiction at all. As stated previously I did not request that Randy ride the board ( which was claimed to be the case by a poster on this thread) I heard from the person who was looking after the board that Randy had decided to ride it. I had no contact with Randy until after he rode it. So, Randy rode the board at his own request not mine, and I did not say that he rode the board without my knowledge, as you have claimed. What you have done is change what I have said in an attempt to create a 'contradiction' where none exists. That is a classic informal fallacy in argument known as the 'straw man'. Which part of that do you fail to understand?
Lol this reminds me of the South Park Coon episode when Kyle is ripping on The Coon and Cartman gets mad at him for calling The Coon a f@g. Kyle asks why he's mad and Cartman responds using the word f@g is insensitive to butt pirates! Classic line.
Hey dummy, look at the two bolded statements, what's wrong with that picture? I'm not the confused one here. You can't mind f*ck me boy.
How many times did rarrick actually get to surf the FP 13 ? My guess is not that many, i think the video indicates it was his first time out. Roy's designs are made for pure surfing and not the Malibu board walking style rarrick is probably used too. In the beginning of the video i see rarrick putting wax on the tail .. ? Pretty sure a displacement tail surfboard never needs a riders foot that far back. I agree rarrick gave a decent review and he seemed genuine which is nice but I don't think he was riding it right is all.
Well... Roy just as long as you understand that your surfboard is not the best surfboard in the world, than I dont have any issue. I just find it silly that you would believe that 1.47 million is realistic price for a surfboard. But maybe you do know this and you are just slapping that price on it for marketing reasons. Well whatever, I took a long look at a lot of your videos and the rarick review and I think your board is just unique. not better than any other board someone chooses to ride. btw, I still have never seen you/your board in a hollow tube ride. so what gives? do you have any vids of that?
Obviously the profit is huge, we don't need to calculate it exactly in order to figure that out... and I don't. What of it?
There's no such thing as the 'best' surfboard in the world and only a retard would imagine that there is. I have many surfboards and surfboard designs, not just one. There's a brief tube ride in one of the videos.
I did not use the Americanism 'anyways' please quote correctly in future. I let him ride the board by instructing the caretaker of the board to allow him to pick the board up and ride it after Randy asked him if he could do so. That's how the board tour worked, the current caretaker would check in with me prior to letting the board go to the next rider. I always granted permission but had the option to refuse. . .
I've read in another forum that rarrick actually really likes Roy "Roy is a rare talent we need more footage of him surfing" that is the premise of what I read typed by rarrick. I think it was some New Zealand surf forum.
Yes, you did use the word "anyway", this is your exact quote ya donkey. You aren't sly enough to get over on me, maybe some others, but not me. Just admit you contradicted yourself, and we'll be done here.