It was your attitude I was referring to, not your bank balance. I am honest in my business activities. That of course, is a matter of individual opinion. Some people say that it is, some say that it isn't. The highest paid artist in the world at present has many critics who say that his works are not art. Some artists do, some don't... what's your point exactly? You appear to be making the argument that having a high asking price precludes one from creating works which one enjoys, and that money is therefore the only motivation. You are absolutely wrong in both cases. I've done the hard yards and gone through hardship which I doubt if any of your artist friends would have been prepared to experience in order to continue their art. I'll continue to create boards as long as I can regardless of my financial situation, as I have in the past. If I make millions, I'll rejoice, if not, I'll still rejoice and will continue to design and build boards as I have in past decades. .
Stuart, how about giving it a rest. Just go back to posting this same exact crapola on Swaylocks.....oh wait, you got banned from there...
'The guy' thinks nothing of the sort. Board walking is part and parcel of unbalanced surfboard design, it was done initially to overcome poor design and is now celebrated as iconic.
Most certainly not. No one is forced to buy my boards and the boards can be seen in the water and under construction, as can the varying opinions published about them. Nothing is hidden, it's all up front.
I'll keep answering as long as members here are interested enough to keep posting on the thread, and I'm not 'spewing cr%p' I'm answering honestly. .
We'll be going to Raglan tomorrow to slide a few on the 12'9" 'Makaha' so will hopefully have some video footage, I'm keen to let that long flat pintail with tunnel fin loose on some pointbreak walls. The Makaha is 12'9" by 27" ( I've been making boards that wide for many years before the SUP revival) by only 2 inches thick... she's a flexible blade, weight 24 pounds ( from memory).
Please go on. Is this the only benefit your designs offer? Based on the evidence you've provided, the "balanced central riding position and sweet spot" is only achieved in the steepest part of the wave. Until you're in the pocket the board is sluggish and is actually pushing the water in the videos you've posted. Until you can prove it differently with something other than your opinion (which is all you've provided thus far), you're not making anything more than subjective statements that your toy is better than mine without backing it up is rather childish. Please provide more factual, design based input on why and/or how you can claim that your "postmodern" surfboards are better than other surfboards that are being produced today. Your design is what is in question here please give us cause and effect type explanation of why you think your design works better. Your price point is your own business. Your clientele is your own business. When you make broad statements that say your creations are better than anything out there I ask you to prove it.
That's not the case,although it has to be pointed out that lower speeds ( which one sees on flatter sections) always move the stagnation line back behind the leading edge of the wetted surface area more than at higher speeds. This is true of all surfboards. The longer designs have superb gliding ability and frequently I can ride unbroken swells when the Malibu and SUp crew cannot. Once in steeper sections the boards do very well also. I have many different longboard designs so it would help if you referred to the specific board rather than 'the board' I'm happy to get into the specific design features of my boards and what they do but have to point out that I have never said that that my boards are "better than other surfboards that are being produced today" So you'll have to re frame your question. . The problem there is that I have never said that. It's a 'straw man' argument.
Sweet... Please post some more pathetic surfing as soon as you have video evidence... The only thing I find more annoying than watching the helmet guy surf with zero style is your ridiculously obnoxious responses.
Thank you for the 'zero style' observation... style is a handicap which I have striven to eliminate. Regarding 'obnoxious' responses: I have been subject to abuse on this thread but have responded politely and calmly... any perceived obnoxious behaviour is simply due to the pain of receiving ideas which your mindset tries to reject rather than due to the content itself... in other words look to yourself.
A performance review of a Stuart board from RR, ridden in moderate surf in Hawaii in 2008: "For Hawaii, you don't need that much rocker. Maybe some nose lift to keep from pearling, but the extreme rocker didn't fit in the curve of the wave and just seemed to slow it down. While the soft rails in the nose are very forgiving, to extend it all the way to the tail makes if feel like an old '60's tanker. I would add some rovings and build up an edge in the tail so that you get some release off the tail. As of now, with the soft rolled rail in the tail, the water wraps over the rail and that combined with the extreme tail lift, just makes it slow down. There is simply no release in the tail. The fin as mentioned above is more area than necessary for the tail width and just tends to create additional drag. Template wise, I would of moved the wide point forward to allow more tail rail, which would of improved the "run" aspect of the board, as now with the curve in the back, it just cuts down what "turning" radius there is. The rocker is way too extreme and you could cut off two feet of nose and it would not hamper the performance of the board in any way. This particular board, as mentioned was fun to ride. The only problem is that I had to make it work. It didn't make it easy for me. I doubt I would want to take it out in anything much hollower than what I had it in, since as I mentioned above, there was no way I could get any drive off the bottom. On a big facy wave it would be fun, but the idea of taking this out to Pipeline would be a scary thought in my opinion."