Donald Trump potus 2016

Seldomme '16

Making Merika eatmyfuk again

 

Fkn A duder, Fkn A.

 

Saved jobs my ass. A new company or existing company would have bought up the company and kept the existing jobs. IF you are looking for jobs, look for a candidate against NAFTA and for bringing back manufacturing jobs like Trump. Bailing out a corporation is all about greed and we are paying to bail out companies that FAIL! No wonder kids don't understand failure these days. Our leaders just prop up the losers or bail them out when they fail. This leads to the worst kind of greed. Be as greedy and corrupt with no risk because our leaders will use OUR money to bail them out.

Has Trump been bailed out by government or just all Hillary's friends?

 

I would like to nominate Sir Seldomme as Governor of the State Of Swell Info.

All in Favor?

 

The Dodd-Frank legislation was horrible but it had nothing to do with the bailout under Bush's term and ex-Goldman Fed reserve chairman Timothy Hitler Geithner. The world would have ended lmao. Let the banks fail and new banks will pick up the pieces. It's called capitalism Barry. I thought you were against communism unless when it comes to lining your pockets. Then, you are fine with government bailouts. I never have met a honest politician or an honest Wall Street employee. I'm sure some exist but most are just Satan's spawn.

Where is the risk when you get bailed out? Give me those odds please. Any idiot can make money on it.

 

Trump is Hillarys friend and the thousands of lawsuits against Trump prove that he could care less about those in manufacturing or production, he only cares about Trump. There is no conceivable way for the US president to recreate those jobs. Trump is just singing a tune, just like the he is critical of "CrookedHillary" lies, and you are eating it up.

 

Really you believe that like the other brainwashed. When the government tells you the world will end and there will be a great depression to prop up banks or bail them out, definitely believe it, lmao. This was under Bush and Timmy boy first before even Dodd-Frank. I'm also pointing out I'm against Dodd-Frank. Currency devaluation and a printing press for the fed is leading us the a depression. These banks are just playing with money and no risk. Too big to fail is a joke. Let them fail.

 

Really, amending tax laws and creating incentives (exports) could bring manufacturing jobs back. Also, being an ahole with China to help them pay their dues instead of the typical ***** leaders we have had for the last 20 years. A sensitive leader with no strength is not what we need right now.

 

I would agree with letting businesses fail any other time or industry/business but there was structural risk in the overall economy that would have created mass hysteria and Social unrest, Including a depression of large proportions. The term to big to fail was/is real. Dodd-Frank came after the great recession and was signed by Obama. I think Barry is referring to earlier legislation (early 90s...Housing and Community Act that was led by Democratic Congress). That Legislation required banks to loan to low to middle income families. Later Clinton Admin doubled down on it pushing the so called subprime borrowing. Then Wall Street later packaged these subprime loans (see the big short movie). Then it all came crumbling down. It wasn't letting a bank fail it was damn near system failure.

 

Yet for some unknown reason, you lack the insight to see yourself responding to everybody else with your own "sophomoric insults" and "rhetorical responses". I'll say it again: You are the definition of the word " HYPOCRITE ".

Why can't you recognize this, Jonathan Livingston Sh!tting Seagull? Is it because you're so much more " educated" and "progressive" than everybody else? Your feeble brain is so cluttered with thoughts on how to save the so-called oppressed? Or does your deep, unveiled hatred for Conservatives clog your synapses and disable your pattern of logic? Either way you're a World Class Piece Of Sh!t.

Why do you seem so familiar to me? I'm sure it's because you are actually one of our regular limp wristed lib posters who doesn't have the balls to post this psychotic drivel under your actual user name, so you created a new account so you could spew your shpeckle and shpiel without taking direct heat. Which not only makes you a hypocrite, but a liar and a coward to boot.

We'll find out who you really are. We always do.

 

I can assure you I'm not brainwashed. The world markets were tumbling. It was real. Hard working folks lost 60% of there retirement accounts and housing prices plunged. The proof is in the Feds actions for the last 7-8 years. Also, look at the GDP #s. I did not like the bailouts (TARP etc) but I also am not sure how things would have turned out otherwise. I am always suspect of gov't data and don't take it lightly.

 

Not even close to a hypocrite. The right is evil and their policies are archaic. Their platform clearly states those facts. You can't handle it so you call me "poor" and "gay" and say I don't have male genitalia, real classy stuff and very well thought out arguments. You can't handle a debate about policy or fact so you lash out at the "libs" with your impotent rage. Then you have the foolish idea I'm not laughing at your ineptitude in the process and think I'm upset over any of this. You're bullies and nothing more and it's a joy to watch you twist in the wind with no critical thinking or foundation to your worldview.

I'm a first time poster with no other account, so wrong again on that one, but that's ok, you seem pretty proud of everything else you get wrong in life.

 

I do agree with some of your points. I believe it was the government and Wall street who caused these problems. Then, government helped bail their buddies out. Barry seems to be acquitting Wall Street from any wrong doing because he has ties to Wall Street. In the end, we could have had economic impacts which is fine by me. Even if that economic impact affected individual investors is fine. They are responsible for where they put their money and if they choose a corrupt chop shop Wall Street firm, then they have risk to lose it. The problem is that their is no risk for a Wall Street firm when our communist lords bail them out.

Wall Street isn't about capitalism, that's bs. Wall Street it just taking communist welfare from government. Soft fascism at it's finest. People are worried about TPP. Folks, it's already here with Wall Street controlling government and Hillary is already in their pocket for the next 4 years. I smell Wall Street ****ing it all up again and Hillary bailing them out. No risk, all gain. What a life.

Real capitalism is at the small business level and free markets. Wall Street is pure socialism.

 

Just saw Shotting Seagull's quote on how the bailout saved Ford and its working families.

Wrong again, turdbucket.

Ford never took a dime of Government money. They rebuilt the corporation without Obama's welfare. And they recovered faster than...

General Motors, who took the money and slowly floundered until finally getting back on their feet. Along the way, they axed pensions and lowered wages while Obama's administration stood idly by.

Wow, that sounds strangely Republican. I bet your clitty gets limp when that sad truth slaps you across your prim facade and smears your rouge, huh Cupcake?

Meanwhile the only evidence we have of GM paying back the loan to American taxpayers iis the liberal media's word.

Sorry, nobody is buying it. That is, nobody but blue jizz guzzling morons like yourself.

Keep posting those lies though. I'll be here to correct you and post the actual truth.

 

#Jonathan Livingston Sh!tting Seagull

 

More like laughing at the childish insults and overall nonexistence of any worthwhile argument from the right wing bullies. Easy to enjoy when your opponent has nothing to stand on and just says "nu-uh, youre a cuckold!"

Typical

 

One day in and I'm gifted a hashtag?

Thanks guys! This is way more fun than I had even hoped for.

Rage on conservative bullies, rage on.