You keep using that word, but I don't think you know what it means. That's ok, lots of obscure words are hard for Trump supporters.
Mr. Codfish, I've been following this fray from the weeds and, probably against better judgment, what I have observed is this: You've accused anyone that does not hold your views as ignorant, archaic, and hateful among other things. Not accurate, not good. Thus, you have made a huge mistake in marginalizing ("pigeonholing") large groups of people. Did it ever occur to you that people may not agree with a belief, behavior or lifestyle, but still have the capacity to love and care for individuals with such beliefs or in such lifestyles? This happens all the time (i.e., to give a simple case, parents of a "prodigal" child). So you are incorrect in calling huge numbers of our population hateful because of the actions of some. I am not at all offended by your views, and even the false dichotomies you seem to embrace, however, I think you might benefit if you widen your perspectives. You seem to be very intolerant and narrow minded, the things very things you appear to be passionate against. If you continue this MO, you likely be called out as a hypocrite by the enforcers (i.e., KR) in this line up. I don't necessarily endorse all the "name calling", but most of us here have thick skin, and hopefully tender hearts. By the way, IMHO, defending either major candidate is akin to an argument as to whether cat poop smells better than dog crap. My $.02 Voting un-enrolled since the 80's
More classless insults, keep diving deeper, maybe you can find the bottom of that intellectual barrel.
I'm sorry. We as a country are divided deeply along party lines and thats the world we have to move around in. If you support any GOP you support homophobia, intolerance, and environmental degredation. You don't actually have a heart if you vote for those things. End of story. You want a third party that is fiscally responsible and socially decent? I'm all for it and wI'll vote for it first chance I get. That doesn't exist so we have the deeply divided situation we have. Doesn't mean you sit back and let the 35% of the country that identifies as orthodox conservative screw it up for the rest of us. Love the localism analogy, the heavies in the lineup are always a-holes, and deserve to be put in their place. I've done it at some serious surfspots and I'll continue doing it here.
Refute my opinions with actual argument instead of calling me a "libtard" or a "cuckhold" or "poor socialist" and we can have an actual discourse. No one has done that yet.
Wasn't it the left (FDR) who put Japanese-Americans in internment camps, and turned away boatloads of Jewish refugees fleeing Nazi Germany? Doesn't the left support Planned Parenthood and their murder of 100,000's black babies? Hasn't black unemployment doubled in the 7 1/2 years under leftist rule (Obama)? Yeah, I'm sure you'll spin it to deflect and defend the left because of your blind allegiance to the left.
Also, nice to see another Cape Codder in these parts. Edit: to the last part I have been mostly arguing party platforms and idealogies, not candidates.
No, he knows the system is "rigged". In order to win, you have to play the game. So he had to run as one or the other. Being that Hillary was probably going to get the Dem. nomination running against her was a no brainer. He's about winning, and that's the easiest path to victory, it's that simple. Once elected he can work on "un-rigging the system" if it's even possible at this point.
I wasn't going to today but Holy fvck, again with the hypocrisy. GOP is.... well left wants to bring in undocumented immigrants that do not assimilate. Not all are criminals like the rapist, child molesting, gay murdering 3rd world fvck stains that you seem support. You say Trump is tied to Wallstreet and so he is evil. Hillary is heavily funded by Wallstreet, Soros, Saudie, etc. how is that not hypocritical. You say Trump is against women but Hillary knowingly defended rapist as a lawyer because it was her civic duty and job. So putting success and money before moral standard is pro-women. Hypocritical and retarded. Wallstreet, left, right, China, Iran don't want Trump and that he is the enemy. Well as you state he has played the Wallstreet scam and knows how they screw everything and everyone. I think that makes him the ideal person to challenge them, not someone that is currently funded by them. I don't disagree that both sides have done some fvcked things, something you have proven unable to do. So I guess your right, anyone that tries to see both sides is ignorant racist blah... So how much do you get paid to post. Does Soros pay you directly, do you get to decide what your mom makes for dinner occasionally.
Yes just like the whole BLM movement I am funded by Soros. What total nonsense. I never once mentioned Trump and Wall street. We as a nation are fantastic at assimilation of refugees from other cultures, it's why attacks occurred in Belgium and France, but not here. Those cultures isolate refugees in culturally defined neighborhoods and it has led to disasters. Your thoughtless rhetoric posted here is the type of foolishness that can demonize and marginalizes our newest transplants. Real helpful stuff. I stated I think Dems are also greed driven, I stated Obama failed to contain the problem of ISIS, etc so I am not a blind faith dogmatic believer of one side, people like you just gloss over those facts because they don't fit your narrative of anyone who opposes you. Edit: missed that last childish insult about Mom's cooking. Wrong, I do most of the cooking for the wife and kids. Next sophomoric idiot insult?
This is the definition of drinking the koolaid aid. I almost hope he wins so people who actually believe this nonsense get taught a lesson. If he wins he will only enrich himself, act as a figurehead like the British monarchy, and that turd Pence will have free reign to keep the system you so despise in place. Probably make things way worse, like our last GOP leader.
Ha... I was going to say the same thing. I have trashed Trump for the past few months and would never have considered voting for him. But I think I am actually going to vote for him now just to vote against Codfish.
Strange how those incidents happened after Trump so loudly and proudly demonized our Muslim population.
What koolaid? I just explained WHY he is running as a Republican vs. an Independent. You can't win this sh*t as an Independent, as cool as it would be, it isn't going to happen. So running as one would be futile and a waste of time. If you're going to run and go through all the effort, then you probably are going to want to win while you're at it. I didn't say that he's going to accomplish all the things he says he's going to do, but it's possible he does some of them. The career politicians are probably sh*tting in their pants right now, he's exposing the system for what it is.