Lol, I know the actual Fukushima situation in it's entirety is far from laughable and there are many unknowns, but that particular write up was lacking. I mean, how seriously can I take that, when homeboy can't even spell? Ps. It's hard for me and I don't particularly like using the word "situation" these days. I wonder why?
It's is a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news...rs-and-scallops-off-bc-coast/article17156108/
as if they're not doing it already. http://www.theaustralian.com.au/new...ukushima-in-sea/story-fnb64oi6-1226851651534#
Just what we(no you Herr Schill) suspected. http://enenews.com/anonymous-senior...-its-impossible-to-fix-before-my-death-theres
http://skeptoid.com/blog/2014/01/06/its-time-to-play-know-your-sources-of-crap/ ENEnews.com: Habitual Skeptoid Blog readers (hi, Dad!) know I’ve done a lot of writing on the scaremongering related to Fukushima. And a primary source of many of the claims I’ve tried to debunk is a site called ENEnews. While most link farms are all over the place in terms of content, ENEnews is basically all Fukushima all the time. Of its 22 current top stories, 21 are Fukushima-related – mostly vague and scary claims attributed to “scientists” or “officials.” Since its founding shortly after the 3/11 earthquake, it’s become a primary source for the alternative media version of events, relentlessly pushing the idea that Japan, the US, nuclear power shills and the mainstream media have conspired to keep the “truth” about Fukushima from us. ENEnews seems willing to make up or exaggerate pretty much any claim in the service making you think toxic radiation is killing the Pacific Ocean, frying the west coast and on the verge of wiping out humanity. None of which is supported by reputable science. A link to ENEnews is a link to bad science. Sample “news” articles: “Gov’t, scientists ‘baffled’ over white spots on cows around Fukushima,” “Official detects radiation spike on California beach, now at 500% normal levels” and “Russian Experts: Fukushima pollution spreads all over Earth, clearly a large amount of fish, seaweeds, and everything in ocean has been polluted” "ENENews receives no funding from anyone or anything, except 1) People who donate via the button below, and 2) Google, who pays for the two ad spots. Thanks to all who have donated or are planning on doing so, it's nice to know people appreciate your work." Fear sells. I am sure you will say I work for the nuclear energy commission now. I will continue to believe you are spamming on behalf of the fear-mongers. Scientists are natural skeptics. You are no scientist.
Is that something that came in your weekly troll packet? Pretty good ending. We, You're no scientist either, but you play one on the internets, Herr Schillmeister!
I think you are on to something here. He seems to always post on this type of stuff. I smell 'paid poster' all over the place.
I have worked as a chemist and as an engineer, so I would say my life is closer to the scientific world than your career of spamming the forum with pseudoscience. More than one person on this forum knows my real name and what I do for a living. But don't let me stop you from enjoying your fantasy world. One of us posts only when misinformation or fear mongering is being spread. The other starts multiple new threads and posts to push fake news and sourceless claims. The evidence isn't working in your favor here.
I'm a professor and biochemist with 5 degrees for telling a shill when I hear one. And I hear you clucking, pheasant.
Hahaha, now that's funny. A biochemist/professor who doesn't care about references or verifiable sources of information. Now you are really making sh1t up.
No Schitt D!ckless Tracey. I'm beginning to think you're just a program set up by the .01 percenters to send out misinformation. DOES THAT COMPUTE!
Data and verifiable resources are not misinformation. Factless quotes from anonymous "insiders" is misinformation. I am enjoying your shill comebacks. There are many on here that think you are full of it, so I guess they are all paid commenters. I just hope you are trolling hard, because I can't believe anyone would be so gullible in real life.
So brew are you saying the fukishima leak isnt causing damage to the ocean?? Or just that the info chich is putting out is wrong?
That's the impression I get. But who am I to say a computer is wrong? Just a mere tin hat wearing, conspiracy theory spouting, ne'er do well.