Hellery Vs Donald POLL

No he doesn't. And Yeah they are.... I don't want her to win, but it's over

 

You seem very confident. That's good. But I don't see it that way. Time will tell though.

 

Haha. It's not good.... I truly do not want her to win. I just wouldn't vote for him either.

 

Good thing nobody is counting on your vote lol

 

Seriously.
I just don't buy the "you HAVE to vote no matter what" bullsh!t... if I'm offered a turd sandwich and a cum burger I'm going to skip a meal.

 

No I hear ya there. I didn't vote last election for the same reason. I'm showing up this time though.

 

My hunch is that this will be a closer popular vote than the professional prognosticators & pundits are pontificating.

Just a guess, but I think Trump is giving voice to a lot of people's basic anger & frustration with the fascist left of hildebeast & the socialist direction that Obama & W have steered this nation.

The common citizen believes that more govt = less effective solutions, more cost to the people & less accountability by said govt.

Trump has a certain advantage in several ways at this late juncture:
- the people are already numb to sex scandals due, actually, to prez billy's serial assaults for the past couple decades;
- the majority of this nation likely does believe that Washington is a cesspool & needs draining;
- the majority of Americans likely does believe that the clintons represent the criminality & criminal cronyism that culminated in the debacle of 2008-9, wherein not one of the asshat 'leaders' went to jail, yet plenty of folks lost their homes & lost their financial security;
- the majority of Americans aren't pleased with the direction this nation is sliding;
- the taxes & the govt programs like O-care are killing small businesses.

Sometimes, people vote for change just for the sake of change.

Unfortunately, unless Trump wins by a wide margin, if this thing is even sorta close, he will lose. The establishment will see to that.

 

Agreed, all valid points.

 

gracias senor...........both candidates blow ass, I'm on the same page as nynj there.....butt if I'm gonna pick a horse, it's narcissist don over criminal clinton......

Here's an interesting piece in the lamestream media, from the WSJ:

If average voters turned on the TV for five minutes this week, chances are they know that Donald Trump made lewd remarks a decade ago and now stands accused of groping women.

But even if average voters had the TV on 24/7, they still probably haven’t heard the news about Hillary Clinton: That the nation now has proof of pretty much everything she has been accused of.

It comes from hacked emails dumped by WikiLeaks, documents released under the Freedom of Information Act, and accounts from FBI insiders. The media has almost uniformly ignored the flurry of bombshells, preferring to devote its front pages to the Trump story. So let’s review what amounts to a devastating case against a Clinton presidency.

Start with a June 2015 email to Clinton staffers from Erika Rottenberg, the former general counsel of LinkedIn. Ms. Rottenberg wrote that none of the attorneys in her circle of friends “can understand how it was viewed as ok/secure/appropriate to use a private server for secure documents AND why further Hillary took it upon herself to review them and delete documents.” She added: “It smacks of acting above the law and it smacks of the type of thing I’ve either gotten discovery sanctions for, fired people for, etc.”

(After this article was published, Ms. Rottenberg released a statement saying the views expressed in her email were not hers but were those of individuals who planned to attend a campaign event. See below.)

A few months later, in a September 2015 email, a Clinton confidante fretted that Mrs. Clinton was too bullheaded to acknowledge she’d done wrong. “Everyone wants her to apologize,” wrote Neera Tanden, president of the liberal Center for American Progress. “And she should. Apologies are like her Achilles’ heel.”

Clinton staffers debated how to evade a congressional subpoena of Mrs. Clinton’s emails—three weeks before a technician deleted them. The campaign later employed a focus group to see if it could fool Americans into thinking the email scandal was part of the Benghazi investigation (they are separate) and lay it all off as a Republican plot.

A senior FBI official involved with the Clinton investigation told Fox News this week that the “vast majority” of career agents and prosecutors working the case “felt she should be prosecuted” and that giving her a pass was “a top-down decision.”

The Obama administration—the federal government, supported by tax dollars—was working as an extension of the Clinton campaign. The State Department coordinated with her staff in responding to the email scandal, and the Justice Department kept her team informed about developments in the court case.

Worse, Mrs. Clinton’s State Department, as documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act show, took special care of donors to the Clinton Foundation. In a series of 2010 emails, a senior aide to Mrs. Clinton asked a foundation official to let her know which groups offering assistance with the Haitian earthquake relief were “FOB” (Friends of Bill) or “WJC VIPs” (William Jefferson Clinton VIPs). Those who made the cut appear to have been teed up for contracts. Those who weren’t? Routed to a standard government website.

The leaks show that the foundation was indeed the nexus of influence and money. The head of the Clinton Health Access Initiative, Ira Magaziner, suggested in a 2011 email that Bill Clinton call Sheikh Mohammed of Saudi Arabia to thank him for offering the use of a plane. In response, a top Clinton Foundation official wrote: “Unless Sheikh Mo has sent us a $6 million check, this sounds crazy to do.”

 

The entire progressive apparatus—the Clinton campaign and boosters at the Center for American Progress—appears to view voters as stupid and tiresome, segregated into groups that must either be cajoled into support or demeaned into silence. We read that Republicans are attracted to Catholicism’s “severely backwards gender relations” and only join the faith to “sound sophisticated”; that Democratic leaders such as Bill Richardson are “needy Latinos”; that Bernie Sanders supporters are “self-righteous”; that the only people who watch Miss America “are from the confederacy”; and that New York Mayor Bill de Blasio is “a terrorist.”

The leaks also show that the press is in Mrs. Clinton’s pocket. Donna Brazile, a former Clinton staffer and a TV pundit, sent the exact wording of a coming CNN town hall question to the campaign in advance of the event. Other media allowed the Clinton camp to veto which quotes they used from interviews, worked to maximize her press events and offered campaign advice.

Mrs. Clinton has been exposed to have no core, to be someone who constantly changes her position to maximize political gain. Leaked speeches prove that she has two positions (public and private) on banks; two positions on the wealthy; two positions on borders; two positions on energy. Her team had endless discussions about what positions she should adopt to appease “the Red Army”—i.e. “the base of the Democratic Party.”

Voters might not know any of this, because while both presidential candidates have plenty to answer for, the press has focused solely on taking out Mr. Trump. And the press is doing a diligent job of it.

 

Yep.....the clinton criminal crew. And this is just what we discovered from her own & her staffer's emails.

The lamestream media is trying like hell to ensure that Trump doesn't get in. Conspiracy? Without a doubt.

 

btw, for those that pound their chest in re how 'free' we are here in America in terms of the media...uh, well, in 2014 America ranked 46th in the world for freedom of the press. So much for "we are great because we are good" as hbeast spoketh in the last primetime shiiitshow.

Case in point: Obama's active plan to put federal monitors in newsrooms across America. You can't even make this stuff up, folks. This is why the fascist left is the fascist left.

You may not care for Trump's wandering paws, and I agree there;
yet, I care much more about the destruction of my country's Constitution & with it our civil rights;
that is the provenance of the fascist left.

 

Great series of posts.

 

especially when they get to pack the courts with judges who believe the Constitution is a loose guide not an absolute.

 

#9/12


All the other bullsh!t aside, Trump is gonna fock our public lands in the arse along with what lives there. That blood won't be on my hands, not voting.

 

Yea, too bad it's complete bullshiiiiite.

Monitors in the newsrooms? Come on. 2 seconds of digging reveals this is completely bogus. From the FCC, "Any suggestion that the FCC intends to regulate the speech of news media or plans to put monitors in America's newsrooms is false. The FCC looks forward to fulfilling its obligation to Congress to report on barriers to entry into the communications marketplace, and is currently revising its proposed study to achieve that goal."*

The FCC, is required by law to be concerned about community needs and whether broadcasters are meeting them. They don’t actually care about this as much as they used to, but the law’s the law, and they still care. So two years ago, while they were prepping their “Section 257 Report” to Congress, they commissioned USC’s Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism to produce a literature review of existing research about “the critical information needs of the American public and the barriers to participation in the communications industry that might limit the extent to which critical needs are met.”

 

This is also my take on the Trump 'campaign'. He just really loves the rallies and attention, everything else is, meh.