High Efficiency Toilets

Discussion in 'All Discussions' started by WankyPumpMaster, Apr 12, 2017.

  1. Barry Cuda

    Barry Cuda Guest

    First, the "creation scientists" failed, changing their topic to "intelligent design".
    Similarly, "global warming" has been changed to "climate change".

    Both in an attempt to make it more digestible to morons. those you call "mooks".
     
  2. Scoopy!

    Scoopy! Well-Known Member

    173
    Aug 28, 2016
    If some "green movement" organization would provide me with financial compensation to have a vasectomy...

    Then snip snip friends.
     

  3. sigmund

    sigmund Well-Known Member

    Dec 7, 2015
    I'm not joking, you can book your NW Passage cruise today -> http://www.crystalcruises.com/northwest-passage-cruise
     
  4. Sniffer

    Sniffer Well-Known Member

    Sep 20, 2010
  5. sigmund

    sigmund Well-Known Member

    Dec 7, 2015
    Yea, but half the world could be underwater, and we'd still be talking shat here on the old SI Forume.
     
  6. Sniffer

    Sniffer Well-Known Member

    Sep 20, 2010
    Actually over 70% of the world is under.
     
  7. JayD

    JayD Well-Known Member

    Feb 6, 2012
    OP- I installed one of those two flush systems. It works great. single flush for #1 and double flush for #2. Saves some H2o I presume...

    Sigmoney- better get your ticket for that cruise before the next ice age:cool:
     
  8. Clownface

    Clownface Well-Known Member

    747
    Jan 24, 2017
    You're being to specific, you might hurt someones feelings.

    Anyways the ocean is actually translandic so there is no land. And the Land is transoceanic so the earth is already flooded. #geoaquaequality
     
  9. JayD

    JayD Well-Known Member

    Feb 6, 2012
    BTW, you guys try any of that Glacier H20? it's like $100 a bottle.

    Oh, and how about the new technology with the bottle less water...the thing is edible with the H20 inside. Pretty cool.
     
  10. kidde rocque

    kidde rocque Well-Known Member

    Mar 6, 2016
    And before that, it was called the "ozone layer".

    Seems like the science on this particular subject changes about every decade or so.
     
  11. HelpHelpLetMeOut

    HelpHelpLetMeOut Well-Known Member

    Mar 2, 2017
    prove its manmade
     
  12. HelpHelpLetMeOut

    HelpHelpLetMeOut Well-Known Member

    Mar 2, 2017
    While I believe something is wacky with releasing carbon dioxide into the atm at an alarming rate, you cant possibly prove its anthropogenic "Global Climate Change" (the new term dujour) without taking massive liberties with things like facts and data

    IMO it goes like this. Photosynthesis has been drawing down carbon dioxide from the atm for 3.4 billion years making trees that power animals. Then they die and carcasses are sequestered in the earth and turn into fossil fuels via processes. Trees have been sequestering it for 3.4 billion years, now we have been burning through it like a teenage arab on daddy's allowance since the industrial revolution. how much is left? hard to say. how much is easy to get? we will find out in my lifetime.

    3,400,000,000 to save it
    500 to spend it
    that's a big difference, its like taking your grandparents and parents savings and blowing it in 45 min in AC

    this is all conjecture and feelings


    nothing scientific
     
    Last edited: Apr 13, 2017
  13. Clownface

    Clownface Well-Known Member

    747
    Jan 24, 2017
    No one stated otherwise that man needs to use their resources responsibility, nor that pollution and man made interference with the earth is concerning. The argument is the green movement is political and used to control the economy and for population control. The green movement has little to do with helping the environment. All those wonder energy sources, if they do exist, and I believe they do, are locked away in the deepest government vault. It's like watching 2 idiots fight over a piece of cheese while big government is rimming your mom out upstairs after leaving that slice of cheese on the living room floor. I see it all the time
     
  14. sheetglass

    sheetglass Well-Known Member

    186
    May 12, 2008
    So it really all boils down to whether or not you believe the greenhouse effect is a real phenomena
     
  15. Barry Cuda

    Barry Cuda Guest

    Al Gore stated Manhattan would be underwater by 2012. It was "settled science".
    Have you been to Manhattan recently?? Dry.
     
  16. sigmund

    sigmund Well-Known Member

    Dec 7, 2015
    I was joking burry, but I do believe we're in for some shiiiit over the next 50 - 100 years or so once we hit a tipping point. Right now the signs are subtle, such as the never imagined opening of the NW Passage, or the fact that you can't catch lobster anymore in Connecticut or RI (they've all gone north to cooler water), but soon it won't be subtle.
     
    Last edited: Apr 13, 2017
  17. PA_KOOK

    PA_KOOK Well-Known Member

    434
    Apr 4, 2016
    my thoughts exactly...wait what?
     
  18. Skip2mylue23

    Skip2mylue23 New Member

    2
    Mar 2, 2017
  19. sigmund

    sigmund Well-Known Member

    Dec 7, 2015
    The scientific consensus says it is manmade, but really, does it matter anymore? Will we spend less trying save our coastlines either way?
     
  20. Barry Cuda

    Barry Cuda Guest

    Climate change has been with Earth since it formed. There have been vastly greater warmer periods during which organisms much larger than us existed, and much warmer than what the most radical computer climate models say we are "in for".
    It is okay with me. I would love to see coconut trees hanging over the sands at the Wall, wouldn't you??
    Politicians used the warming scare to get money from morons. It is why so many surfers buy into it--because they are morons. Also, the Swedes are morons--they gave Gore a Nobel for an imbecility.