This is per Nancy off the Zeta site. "This excellent video capture from S Africa is taken at first glance to be a capture of Nibiru, as it is red in appearance and swings along the Ecliptic with the Sun. But Nibiru is seen at the 11 o’clock position in the Southern Hemisphere and thus would be seen atop the Sun, not well below. This is in fact a Monster Persona of Venus, which appears to be too close to the Sun as it is pressed close to the Earth by being caught in the cup at present. It is swinging from left to right along with the Ecliptic, in the counterclockwise motion appropriate for the Southern Hemisphere. Recent crop circles designs have hinted that a looming Venus or Dark Twin would appear more often, and they have!" "Oops!" Rick Perry.
and being skeptical of the status quo is yours http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1420798/ ". Peer review sometimes picks up fraud by chance, but generally it is not a reliable method for detecting fraud because it works on trust. A major question, which I will return to, is whether peer review and journals should cease to work on trust." "So we have little evidence on the effectiveness of peer review, but we have considerable evidence on its defects. In addition to being poor at detecting gross defects and almost useless for detecting fraud it is slow, expensive, profligate of academic time, highly subjective, something of a lottery, prone to bias, and easily abused." science has flaws dog. live with it but on that note, chich, you are out there bra
Sure, science has flaws. But you are completely ignorant to the processes involved. You think because something isn't perfect, we should automatically accept non-scientific "research". Real peer reviewed research is always vulnerable to retraction, based on additional research or data. Peer reviewed research isn't definitive, but it is better than not having peer reviewed research. http://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2015/as-good-as-it-gets-peer-review-and-its-discontents/ But this really gets down into the core of your belief structure. You believe that if something isn't perfect, we should just do away with it all together. Much like your take on government. Instead of working and pushing to improve what we have, you rather dissolve it. You and I should just permanently agree to disagree.
Unfortunately, for the sneaky government, any object visible in the sky during the daytime would have been discovered and documented long ago by the thousands of people that represent the amateur astronomy community. You should join a few of those forums and learn a thing or two.
You mean the same gubmint that said Saudis armed with box cutters was able to overpower a plane full of people and bring down concrete and steel blds using burning jet fuel(kerosene)? The same ones who said Saddam has WMDs and we're a hair away from a smoking gun becoming a mushroom cloud? O Brewshilla!
I am pretty sure the whole government didn't claim Iraq had WMD's. Don't confuse the messed up Bush administration with the entire US government (that very government that is now helping you pay for healthcare). As for the 9/11 stuff, I am not getting into that. It is moronic. However, your post was a nice attempt to change the topic. Astronomy forums: http://stargazerslounge.com/ http://www.astronomyshed.co.uk/forum/index.php And a nice little article on Planet X, which should have killed us all in 2012: http://www.skeptic.com/reading_room/2012-and-counting/ “Keep an open mind, but no so open that your brains fall out" - James Oberg, NASA engineer
Brewshilla, evidently you only know what you're told by your masters. But, indeed, this time it was misinformation. As per Nancy of the Zetas: Nancy Update: It seems the 2008 Nibiru on Google Sky location, the location of the documented black box, was below the Ecliptic at -6 etc. Where Nibiru should have been. The new flurry is an object at +22, above the ecliptic. Nibiru has not pierced the ecliptic as yet. The +22 object is thus likely to be a real object, showing up on star charts way back when. This was featured in a vid in 2012 and in the lastest flurry with a 2015 vid on BeforItsNews. That vid has now been removed from YouTube. What we know for sure is that the 2008 "leaked" object was the right location, and Google found they had to put a black box there, for years. Google Sky now shows this region without a black box blocking it. Nibiru is likely not there anymore, as this is a MOVING planets. I note in reading the ZT given, above, that the Zetas were referring to the 2008 OBJECT and never state that the new location, +22 dec, is correct. All this is on YouTubes - Zeta Report 67 http://youtu.be/-sn85fY8PIk shows the 2008 location and how it lines up with the Zeta path. Zeta Report 68 http://youtu.be/dKkW5XLm6P4 clarifies that the 2008 location is accurate and was a true image of Nibiru, but the later video at +22 Declination is a fraud. Zeta Report 69 https://youtu.be/jq5H6bhFrA0 stressed the 2MASS mapping was done years ago and the 2008 Google Sky image likely captured in the 80's or 90's also the story of tracking by Zeta coordinates in 2001-2003.
My masters? You mean the German automotive industry? Cause they are the only ones signing my paychecks. I am still not convinced you aren't a Poe.
Here's a guy who has "translated" crop circles. Whether it's translated right or not isn't whats disturbing, but that he shows a 5 planet alignment for 11/7/15. Another guy predicted a major quake on the west coast using another alignment last May. [video=youtube;_Nnz9vVg7J8]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Nnz9vVg7J8[/video]