Misqumaicut area MAJOR REPLENISHMENT project

Discussion in 'Northeast' started by shark-hunter, Mar 23, 2014.

  1. shark-hunter

    shark-hunter Well-Known Member

    Apr 29, 2012
    What a disaster this sounds like

    http://www.thewesterlysun.com/news/...ial-shoveling-sand-against-mother-nature.html

    The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has one ambitious plan for Misquamicut State Beach in the wake of damage from Superstorm Sandy. Specifically, the Corps wants to take on Mother Nature and bring in an estimated 90,000 cubic yards of sand that agency engineers figure have been taken away over the decades. The vision is to bring the state beach property back to how it looked on opening day in 1959.

    "The proposal calls for about 3,000 truckloads of sand to be distributed along a 150-foot-wide area between the dunes and the water — and into the water — to a depth of about 2 to 3 feet. The sand would be spread along the entire 3,200-foot length of the beach"


    http://www.nae.usace.army.mil/Media...toration-of-misquamicut-beach-in-westerl.aspx
     
    Last edited: Mar 23, 2014
  2. shark-hunter

    shark-hunter Well-Known Member

    Apr 29, 2012
    http://www.nae.usace.army.mil/Portals/74/docs/PublicServices/PublicNotice/MisquamicutBeachPN.pdf

    You can see in this file there planning on placing sand IN THE WATER basically all the way to where the waves break. This sounds like a complete disaster. This isn't simply a little dumping of sand after sandy. Their planning on getting it back to 1959 levels with a 2-5 million dollar project on the ENTIRE stretch of beach.

    It's supposed to be completed by THIS May before beach season begins. It was supposed to start in march. Anyone around there see any action yet? How come there was never any fight against this by surf chapters that I heard about? They really seemed to back door this and they seem to have ZERO interest in doing replenishing while still preserving the good sandbar.

    Also, this already a VERY short sandbar, unlike gansett town beach/2nd beach. So sand will be placed almost to where the waves break right now. I think this break might be toast :( Probably no sand bar at all. Just a surge wave/wave that breaks on sand. Horrible
     
    Last edited: Mar 23, 2014

  3. shark-hunter

    shark-hunter Well-Known Member

    Apr 29, 2012
    "In order to extend the
    boundary of the MLW line sand mounds will be pushed out into the surf zone using earth-moving
    equipment. This project will require up to 90,000 cubic yards of sand to be placed on the beach and
    expect the nearshore area to be impacted out to at least the -5 foot depth contour. It is expected to
    take approximately two months to complete the proposed project and all work will completed by
    May 23, 2014.
    "
     
    Last edited: Mar 23, 2014
  4. shark-hunter

    shark-hunter Well-Known Member

    Apr 29, 2012
    Their completely out of their minds trying to get it back to 1959. There will be no sandbar left. If you look in that pdf file at the -5 line, they are basically going to push sand right onto the final sandbar before the already sharp drop off that's there right now. In order to save this break they'd have to create a sandbar farther out which their not doing.
    1959 Misqumiacut
    MISQUAMICUT_1959.jpg
    Modern Misquamicut
    MI-2536_xlarge.jpg
    Misquamicut_Beach_RI_2.jpg
    misquamicut-state-beach.jpg
     
  5. kidrock

    kidrock Well-Known Member

    Aug 1, 2010
    the girls in photo #4 look like they have some pretty decent tittays
     
  6. RIsurfer

    RIsurfer Well-Known Member

    997
    Dec 5, 2012
    Dude brah man bro mang broski, no offense, but not every beach replenishment relies on waves. Not every decision is made around the waveriders. We got lucky on the Ruggles save, but this one, I think this is going to be a doozie.
     
  7. shark-hunter

    shark-hunter Well-Known Member

    Apr 29, 2012
    You can adjust it so it doesn't destroy the waves. We are not the only ones unhappy about this. It also sucks for anyone just wanting to play in the waves. Dangerous steep beach. People like to wade in the water and play in the waves. Not take 2 steps and be neck deep. It's also an absolute fortune at 5 million for just under a mile. This is one of the very few beach breaks in RI. We only have a few that don't shore pound. Most of the sandy beaches are not rideable already west of gansett. Why destroy one of the few. Ridiculous.
     
  8. SJerzSrfr

    SJerzSrfr Well-Known Member

    327
    Mar 2, 2010
    its not that big of a deal. 90k cy isnt that much sand.... especially spread over 3200 linear feet. stop believing all the "beach renourishment destroys our breaks" surfrider hype.
     
  9. shark-hunter

    shark-hunter Well-Known Member

    Apr 29, 2012
    Why do people come on and talk out of their behind? Hype? Visit most of Delaware's breaks sometime. It's almost all shore pound. What's left? 2 breaks? If that? In an entire state? Never used to be like that.
    http://delaware.surfrider.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/The-State-of-Surfing-in-Delaware-2.pdf

    Again, it depends HOW they do the replenishment.

    "The use of finer (rather than coarser) grained sand for beachfill projects has been shown to
    widen beaches without steepening beach slopes to the detriment of surfing and swimming conditions.
    Beach fill projects done in Dewey and Rehoboth in 1998 using finer sand from Hen and Chicken Shoal,
    and Ocean City Maryland using finer grained sand have improved or at least maintained quality surfing
    and swimming conditions. T"

    "t shoreline management activities in Delaware should not and need not
    create an exodus of surfers from Delaware to Maryland and elsewhere. Beach nourishment projects
    have been performed in Ocean City Maryland since the 1980s and have been designed in such a way
    that surfing has only been temporarily impacted by the projects and quality surf breaks usually return
    within a month or two of the dredging ending"

    http://archive.delawareonline.com/a...0035/Beach-buildup-making-waves-among-surfers
    "“Beaches aren’t supposed to look like that. Beaches are supposed to be undulating, kind of ebb and flow. The coastline isn’t supposed to be ruler-edged. And yet, that’s what we take these big giant bulldozers and try to create"

    "“Our sandbars for surfing are so close to the beach,” he said. “When they fill that in, they basically take away whatever wave there is.”"
     
    Last edited: Mar 24, 2014
  10. Sniffer

    Sniffer Well-Known Member

    Sep 20, 2010
    Nice! Good look.
     
  11. seldom seen

    seldom seen Well-Known Member

    Aug 21, 2012
    This sucks, just got internet back up at work and this is the first thing I saw...I was out there about three weeks ago and didn't see any signs of this...going to look at the articles now. I thought all the dune restoration was in lieu of this.
     
    Last edited: Mar 24, 2014
  12. EmassSpicoli

    EmassSpicoli Well-Known Member

    Apr 16, 2013
    I don't support any of what they're doing. However, claiming that you're gonna go wave hungry in RI as a result is laughable. Gotta have yet another BB and wouldn't want a terrible thing like a cobblestone bottom at Matunuck right? And those points, what a waste...

    Bro, you've got more good breaks (and varied ones) within 5-45 minutes than just about anyone I can think of.
     
  13. shark-hunter

    shark-hunter Well-Known Member

    Apr 29, 2012
    They don't compare for bodyboarding. Matunuck is a slow wave. The poinits are not barrels. This was a nice hollow beach break. One of the very few in the state. And the crowds are horrific at matunuck.
     
  14. worsey

    worsey Well-Known Member

    Oct 13, 2013
    you need to look at a surfing area and say 'hey bro lets party'

     
  15. seldom seen

    seldom seen Well-Known Member

    Aug 21, 2012
    Gonna check things out this weekend, I'd be really bummed if that spot gets ruined.
     
  16. EmassSpicoli

    EmassSpicoli Well-Known Member

    Apr 16, 2013
    Perhaps. I'm no sympathetic one for spongers though. Surfers go without a lot more than you do. I really don't support any of this beach replenishment though. Lawmakers that do should be out in trunks and made to stand in the unnatural shorebreak it causes. BTW, your posts can be informative and backed by facts and photos at times but you're bordering on rabble-rousing like Starchy and brewengineer would say chich (but long live chich!) and that gets old here even for good causes. Not to mention you going toe to toe with a lot of cats on the reg. But hey, eff all this replenishment.

    Crowds at Matunuck, maybe I'm just there on the right days. That first Saturday in November swell when it was 75 degrees and clean head high swell, there were plenty of people there but there's peaks for days at that break. These long breaks with long waves offer space for many people, I don't know what some of you expect. Personal peaks? So...you can't be the only one on the peak of the best wave at a multi-wave break but now it's gone to crap...?
     
    Last edited: Mar 24, 2014
  17. shark-hunter

    shark-hunter Well-Known Member

    Apr 29, 2012
    Not sympathetic to bodyboarders? How about short boarders or anyone that likes heavy fast barrel.

    You're the one babbling about irrelevant stuff. You don't even have a clue and you're showing your ignorance with these posts. Just ignore my posts if you have nothing to do but troll me.
     
  18. RIsurfer

    RIsurfer Well-Known Member

    997
    Dec 5, 2012
    Meh, just wait for a 10ft groundswell.
     
  19. cepriano

    cepriano Well-Known Member

    Apr 20, 2012
    im surprised the acoe of engineers don't get taken to court for manslaughter.everytime they replenish,they create those steep drop offs where kids die.it happens all the time.thats why I phreakin phukin hate the eastcoast,in cali,they remove sand at Malibu to keep it firing.complete opposite over here.they saved trestles 4 times,we cant even stop 1 beach from being replenished.all to make rich people who have oceanfront property feel safe that they wont get flooded.all my northern nj spots have been replenished,so I have to drive down to ocean just to surf.then u get down there and its just as bad as up north.i can walk to the ocean from my house,but theres no point.they already replenished it last june,and they are currently doing it again right now.beach is all fenced off with bulldozers and a big azz pump.maybe one day I can mve to a place that gets real waves and doesn't get destroyed by politicians.
     
  20. worsey

    worsey Well-Known Member

    Oct 13, 2013
    just go to the beach this weekend….shhhhh…..