What? you mean this whole democracy/election thing is nothing but a tradition? Who would have guessed....
exactly...and so pathetic. To bring it up would force them to answer (or evade) questions about specific ways they might proposed to deal with the debt. The media is as guilty as the candidates for ignoring this huge problem.
Kasich and baby Bush seem to be the only Rep. that aren't bat sh*t crazy/scary. The muse for my orginal post was a middle aged woman I had to speak with due to work that was spouting off aboot jesus and how she thinks we need to take are country back from the niggers.(Her words) As she rambled on aboot how all the Muslims want to kill us for no reason she mentioned what a fine Christian man Trump is. Of course all those illegals should be shot and all Dems are the devil. Then she asked me if I had a personal relationship with the lord. Bless her heart. Go figure.
Trump is a devout Christian starting yesterday. The funny thing about Trump is no one has a clue what he would do in the oval office besides titty f*** his hottie wife on the rug. He is just as likely to be liberal as conservative. All I know for sure is that he is going to make us 'great again' because I heard him say it in a speech. Which begs the question, at what point in our past were we the great nation that we want to get back to?
What?!? You can't be serious... Really??? Everything the guy wants to do is unrealistic and has no real plan to do it. Sure it sounds nice... But so did Obama. And where did that get us? I will say this- I think Barney says what he feels and wants to say and doesn't hold back... I'm not going to say that I'm for a certain candidate, cause at this point I'm not- but there are many others that are much more logical and more fit to lead our country.
Obama got us here. If these numbers are indicative of a failed presidency, I feel really sorry for whomever takes office next. http://www.factcheck.org/2016/01/obamas-numbers-january-2016-update/
Would anybody be that STUPID to buy into those numbers?? Looks like it....... Annenberg Public Policy Ctr, "owners" of factcheck...a LIBERAL left wing organization within University of Pennsylvania, an even greater left wing biased organization. In other words, don't believe everything you read. Just because something is "in print" doesn't make it accurate. I would say the same about right-wing organizations. They all suck.
And if you actually looked a t the sources, you would have seen these players figuring prominently: Google (liberals), Bureau Of labor Statistics (gov--boss Obama), US Energy Administration (gov, boss? Obama), Us Census Bureraau (give, boss? obama), FBI 9gov, boss? obama)? New York Times--slightly liberal, can we say?? Sorry chuck--all liberal bias. You have been duped.
sorry barry, but this is where I get off, conspiracy theory land lies just ahead. It's a place where no debate can exist because everything is a conspiracy, it's a place for you.
You have NO idea what a "conspiracy" is then. You are allowing partisan sources to be your well of information. In this case, the bias is the "liberal side". Articles praising government success should not use government information as the primary source, because they are biased and praise themselves.. Additionally, many of the sources quoted therein, are secondary sources, which circle back to the exact same biased sources. It is an easy trail, man. Therein lie the error of your ways. Wasn't it Charles ****ens that wrote about the governments "Department of Circumlocution" (keep them running in circles so that the truth can never be found??). If it wasn't him, it surely was another of the Victorian authors. Toodle le do....
