Protesting, Riots, Who's Wants To Burn This M'Fer Down!?

Discussion in 'Non Surf Related' started by DawnPatrol321, Sep 21, 2016.


    CBSCREWBY Well-Known Member

    Feb 21, 2012
    The reparations could come in a variety of forms, according to the panel, including "a formal apology, health initiatives, educational opportunities ... psychological rehabilitation, technology transfer and financial support, and debt cancellation."

    Isn't this Welfare? or to be Politically correct, Public Assistance? Just send the check in a sympathy card; reparations complete. Me for president 2016.
  2. ChavezyChavez

    ChavezyChavez Well-Known Member

    Jun 20, 2011
    Exactly. Welfare, food stamps, free lunches, and now they'll get reparations to keep them suckling at the democrat's teet.
    The best is how Georgetown U will give preferential treatment to the descendants of slaves. You can't make this crap up anymore.

  3. sigmund

    sigmund Well-Known Member

    Dec 7, 2015
    Well, we had 11 attacks on our Embassies during the Bush era with 56 killed, and there were exactly zero Republican investigations.
    Last edited: Sep 28, 2016
  4. kidde rocque

    kidde rocque Well-Known Member

    Mar 6, 2016
    Hey, you said yourself that we were talking about Benghazi, and to try to stay on topic. What's the problem, Chief? You start losing a debate, and you automatically shift to GW Bush? What's next, you gonna pull out the race card? Your liberal slip is showing, Cupcake.

    But if you want to compare apples to oranges, let's go there.

    You say there were "zero Republican investigations". You're right. What actually happened were Congressional investigations into each and every incident. "Congressional", meaning both Republicans and Democrats. Why? Because every single incident warrants an investigation. DERP

    Those incidents under GW Bush share no similarities whatsoever to Benghazi. Neither Colin Powell nor Condoleeza Rice attempted to cover up the truth about any of those attacks. They didn't try to blame some stupid insignificant video, nor did they ever attempt to cover up an order to "stand down" while our embassies were being attacked.

    Have you always been this clueless? Or did you go to a special kind of school for that?
  5. Barry Cuda

    Barry Cuda Guest

    I am all for "reparations". But then again, Websters dictionary defines that word as "to make as before". That means we round them up and ship them back to Africa.
    Having said that, this topic is yet another reason to close the UN and send them to Russia for the next 100 years. I wonder--how many ambassadors would go?? My bet: ZERO.
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 28, 2016
  6. seldom seen

    seldom seen Well-Known Member

    Aug 21, 2012
    I draw the line at reparations. I'll join The Brand before I pay a cent.
  7. archy 2.0

    archy 2.0 Well-Known Member

    Jul 5, 2012
    Is anyone still going to argue that this country is moving into a One World Government?
    A New World Order.
    The internet handed over to the UN.
    The power to regulate is the power to destroy.
    Last edited: Sep 28, 2016
  8. archy 2.0

    archy 2.0 Well-Known Member

    Jul 5, 2012
    Last edited: Sep 28, 2016
  9. sigmund

    sigmund Well-Known Member

    Dec 7, 2015
    the personal attacks seem pretty unnecessary, but if that's how you roll, then whatever.

    If you think there were no political motivations in 8 separate congressional committee investigations into the Benghazi attack that dragged on for over 2 years, then I don't know what to tell you.

    They didn't cover up an order to stand down. "Debunking a series of persistent allegations hinting at dark conspiracies, the two-year investigation of the politically charged incident determined that there was no intelligence failure, no delay in sending a CIA rescue team, no missed opportunity for a military rescue, and no evidence the CIA was covertly shipping arms from Libya to Syria."

    There were also *no* congressional committee investigations into the other embassy attacks I mentioned, but maybe you have something on this, I certainly couldn't find anything.
  10. cepriano

    cepriano Well-Known Member

    Apr 20, 2012
    Colin Powell and Condoleeza Rice should be in prison.....and this thread is starting to turn into a conspiracy.

    colin was a good guy tho for the country,a 5 star general,we don't get many of those in office.but yea he should still be in prison for that state of the union address where he blatantly lied about iraqs wmds.aside from that hes a good man....condoleeza tho............
  11. yankee

    yankee Well-Known Member

    Sep 26, 2008
    Sniffle piffle......The Keed was gentle with you, siggbutt, consider yourself fortunate; he's a master of the riposte.

    You, sadly, are a mistress of The Victim Syndrome, bought & paid for.

    Benghazi is simple: vivid illustration of Clinton's incompetence as a leader. In this day & age, she wasn't prepared for terrorism. And that cost American lives. How in the hayell can a Secretary of State NOT be on constant watch for terrorism?? Does she need more examples or what?

    As president Clinton she would facilitate the most massive victimization of all time: the USA would be the doormat whilst she sits there, taking her injections, wringing her hands & screaming invectives at her Secret Service detail.
  12. sigmund

    sigmund Well-Known Member

    Dec 7, 2015
    o yankee, ya got no soul brother.