Retro fish suggestions

Discussion in 'Mid Atlantic' started by lolwut, Dec 27, 2010.

  1. lolwut

    lolwut Well-Known Member

    76
    Aug 29, 2010
    Hi guys,
    Ill start with some background info. I am in nj. I dont have much surfing experience at all. I have skimboarded for the past few years and am comfortable on the wave face. I also dont have the confidence in myself to surf anything over head high. I am 5'9 and weight about 155 pounds.

    I want to get a retro fish board that can work from thigh high slop to waves up to head high. I dont know what dimensions i should be looking at since im not all too familiar surfboards. I want a floaty board that is easy to paddle. i just want to cruise down the line with some basic cutbacks and such. Nothing too much. Also, what should i be looking at fin-wise.

    Any help is appreciated. thanks guys. Also any cheap local shapers would be great too
     
    Last edited: Dec 27, 2010
  2. MATT JOHNSON

    MATT JOHNSON Well-Known Member

    Oct 11, 2009
    I just put a down payment on my retro fish today. I am 5'11 and 170 lbs I went with a 5'8 x 22 3/4 by 2 3/4 thick its a epoxy so its a bit more floaty than a poly board. I decided to go with the Rasta Keel after I rode a board made my the same shaper with the same specs he had the rasta's on it and they were fast but didnt make to board too squirly but the responded nice without alot of effort
     

  3. lolwut

    lolwut Well-Known Member

    76
    Aug 29, 2010
    so would you recommended me going an inch shorter but keeping width and thickness for float because i have much less experience than you?
     
  4. MATT JOHNSON

    MATT JOHNSON Well-Known Member

    Oct 11, 2009
    Yeah I got the board cause of the width and thick ness cause I mostly longboard and I like a shorter board with some thickness and width so the long to short akwardness is less dramatic
     
  5. njsurfer42

    njsurfer42 Well-Known Member

    Nov 9, 2009

    just out of curiosity, why a retro fish? what are you riding now? what was the thought process that led you to decide that a retro fish is what you're looking for?
     
  6. JTS

    JTS Well-Known Member

    231
    Feb 21, 2010
    Matt -
    22 3/4 seems a bit wide, is that a typo?

    To the OP if you are set on a retro type fish consider contacting Michael Zippi
    http://zippifish.wordpress.com/
    he makes really excellent twin keels, with an extremely fast turnaround (made a board and had it shipped in 18 days - during the summer) At your size a 5'8" could work well

    Jim
     
  7. lolwut

    lolwut Well-Known Member

    76
    Aug 29, 2010
    ive heard from quite a few fellow skimmers that they ride just like a skimboard.
     
  8. exilenj

    exilenj Well-Known Member

    358
    Jun 26, 2009
    as much as i loved my retro fish/flat rockered.. i would not take it in head high surf since 90% of the time its throwing in sand... its hard to stick landings with them. fun as hell in the mellow stuff. what you want is a lost rnf... more refined twin ,2+1, quad whatever it may be. that board will handle a lot of different conditions. addiciting board i've had 2, ill prob have another shaped this winter..at 155lbs id go 5'6 19 1/8 or 191/4 by 2 1/4...thats all you need to know. have brian wynn shape you one in resin-x lokbox'd and you'll love it that much more. end of discussion ;) pm me if you have any questions.
     
  9. lolwut

    lolwut Well-Known Member

    76
    Aug 29, 2010
    how much would a board from wynn cost roughly?
     
  10. 9ten

    9ten Well-Known Member

    60
    Nov 13, 2009
  11. lolwut

    lolwut Well-Known Member

    76
    Aug 29, 2010
    that is amazing. sadly im in no rush since i dont feel like winter surfing with a 4/3. i will probably seriously start looking in march/saving money
     
  12. gromsurfer123

    gromsurfer123 Well-Known Member

    100
    Sep 18, 2008
    nectar quad.jpg

    nectar quad back.jpg

    i live in nj as well ad this is one of my favorite boards. im partially tattooing the logo actually. its 5'10 and the dimensions are like 22 wide by 3 thick at the biggest5 points i believe because you can not make them out exactly. anyway 350 if you want it, message me
     
  13. wontonwonton

    wontonwonton Well-Known Member

    383
    Mar 13, 2007
    NO!!!!!!!!!!!!

    6'3'' 7s superfish. Easiest board to ride. It can ride 1 ft waves or well overhead. Probably most forgiving board and mine is going on 5 years of shallow shorebreak.

    GIT IT
     
  14. Mitchell

    Mitchell Well-Known Member

    Jan 5, 2009
    I'm 5'9" 160 and have two retro fishes i shaped myself.

    5'5" x 21" x 2 5/8"
    5'10" x 21" x 2 5/8"

    They both have more volume than i need but in that kind of board more volume isnt a bad thing and the 5'10" is great for full winter rubber float. These boards are really fast, and work really good in down-the-line waist - chest high waves. I hve seen Brian Wynn's boards but not ridden them...he has retro fishes dialed in, and i know he has a lot of experience with that shape. Make sure you ask the shaper to put the wide point at least 4-6" forward of center for the full (fast) experience.

    I would seriuosly consider that Steve Brom board as well...that is a sweet shape and the guy is a legendary shaper of fishes.
     
    Last edited: Dec 28, 2010
  15. Greenlight

    Greenlight Well-Known Member

    286
    Nov 13, 2008
    Since you say you don't have much surfing experience make sure you get a board that you can catch waves with. Longer and wider is better. You should really be looking at a longboard if you want to get the fundamentals of surfing down quick but if you insist on a retro fish get it at least 21" wide and a length no shorter than 5'10" for your size. You gotta catch waves first before you can do those cutbacks so get a board that paddles well.
    Twin keels and wide point forward like Mitchell says...

    ~Brian
    www.greenlightsurfsupply.com
     
  16. kidrock

    kidrock Well-Known Member

    Aug 1, 2010
    Greenlight is right....you don't really specify exactly how much actual surfing experience you have, but it sounds as if the majority of your experience is skimboarding. If this is true, you should probably try and gain surfing experience on another shape other than a retro fish. A "fun shape", such as a modern egg would be a much better shape for easily getting into waves, standing up and turning....a longer, wider shape for learning.

    Once the learning curve has expanded, then a retro fish is a great board, especially in typical beach break. Don't get confused between "retro fish" and a quad fish, because they both ride differently. The poster with the Brom is a good example of the retro, and the Nectar is a good example of a quad. (off thread for a second....I'd love to know who shaped that Nectar. Is Gary McNabb back in business?)

    Generally, your fish should be as tall as you are. The heavier you are, the more thickness the board should have. At 155 lbs, anything from 2 1/2 - 2 3/4 inches thick will be fine.

    If you want to get a good look at some of the best fishes on the East Coast, visit the Mollusk Surf Shop in NY. The best Fish shapers in the world have their boards there.
     
  17. DaMook

    DaMook Well-Known Member

    868
    Dec 30, 2009
    x2 on Brian Wynn, but i agree with above. Get the right board. Considering the money and the investment I can't blame you on getting a fish. Just as hard to learn on, no matter what board you get.
     
    Last edited: Dec 28, 2010
  18. lolwut

    lolwut Well-Known Member

    76
    Aug 29, 2010
    well i figured since i can occasionally catch waves on my 52"x20.6"x3/4" skimboard on days with push, i would be ok on a longer much thicker fish. Small boards also appeal to me 100x more due to the fact that i wouldnt be able to fit anything bigger than 5'10 in my car.
     
  19. lolwut

    lolwut Well-Known Member

    76
    Aug 29, 2010
    Any rough estimates on how much a custom wynn costs or other shapers? doesnt need to be exact but is 600$ reasonable
     
  20. Ray F.

    Ray F. Well-Known Member

    396
    Sep 13, 2009
    You catch waves or you skim out and onto the faces?