This Sh*t has to stop!

You're correct; I stand corrected.

It would appear that people are now starting to push back against the ideology of hate with violence of their own. Not saying it's right or wrong, but I'm kinda surprised it's taken this long to happen.

Lotta folks have had enough. the professional pols opened the home front doors to the islamist hatemongers who kill; now the rest of us have to 'deal with it' to paraphrase that asshat mayor of London town.

No. We ain't gotta 'deal with it' and we sure as fock don't have to accept it.

The islamists & the leftists are the violent items on the agenda. As mentioned, by others here as well, people are going to push back. Likely because the pols are frozen in place & not doing enough to protect the genpop. The pols with their fear of the progressive Left going DEFCON6 on them for actually demonstrating leadership....

What a mess.

 

+1

 

It was bound to happen. How many times do you watch this sh!t happen and do nothing. I mean you know where these dudes hang out (mosques).
The problem is it only help the extremists recruit.

 

Yes, yes....we had McVeigh.
But allow me to correct you--not only did we "condemn" him, we killed the fvcker. The muslims terrorists should be subjected to the same fate. But they don't here in America. Why? Liberal jackasses, I would conclude, that are judges, etc. that absolutely execute whites, but not one "brown foreigner" terrorist in Guantanamo.
just opinion....just saying... just concluding....just calling it as it is.... just.....on & on....

 

True. Violence almost always begets more violence. Again, not judging just making an observation.

I don't see any of it diminishing. Obviously, the islamists want we-the-infidels dead & will do anything to make that happen for the next, oh, millennia or so.

And the instinct for revenge and /or counter-measures will grow stronger amongst us infidels-who-don't-want-to-be-blown-up-whilst-shopping.

Again, the irony is that this entire situation was avoidable via propere governing from our 'leaders.' Now...? Likely too late to avoid more & more violence for generations to come.

 

I've said it before I'll say it again.
This has been the plan for a looong time.
Ordo Ab Chao

 

What I don't understand is why we don't have better intelligence on the bastards. I know its frowned upon by my more liberal brethren, but why don't was have insiders in mosques etc.? It blows my mind that we have intel on the inner workings of the Iranian Republic Guard, but not in neighborhood mosques where so much of this emanates. It seems both right and left can agree that identifying the problem people, imams, etc. and executing them is better than condemning an entire group of people.

And Barry... the white supremacist that I was referring to is the guy who was yelling at two muslim girls on a train, and then stabbed two people who tried to stop him. I wasn't surprised to see no one talking about it on this forum, but here is the link... http://www.latimes.com/nation/nationnow/la-na-portland-stabbing-20170527-story.html

 

Deep State doesnt want intel on them. The rush for immigration has everything to do with power and nothing about security.

 

Maybe the coverage wasn't extensive enough and the liberal press backed away because the so-called 'white supremacist' wasn't cutting the mustard as the poster child for Muslim hate.
Turns out the dude was a hardcore Berntard.

 

What Pump said ^^

To add to that, intel is only as good as what one does with it. Or, in America, what the 'leaders' want to do with it. Oft-times, intle gets shelved due to The Deep State's over-riding maintaining-power aspects.

It's been well-known / documented by the FBI for decades that over 90% of American mosques funnel money from the USA to Al Qaeda & Hezbollah. It's been a very sore spot for the Israelis for many years.

Buuuuut......the professional pols won't do anything with the intel. Because they're afeard of coming off as anti-islamic, or they've been bought off by the Saudi oil money.

The madrassas as run by the Saudis around the world are nothing more than fronts for training terrorists. Also well-documented by our intel services. Nothoing done about it by our pols. And people die because of that.

Not making this stuff up, folks, and it's not a bogey man conspiracy theory, either.

The Deep State swings heavy diiiick: back in the day, when the IRA was blowing up anything & everything in London & Northern Ireland, the IRA was receiving a huge chunk of their weapons money from right here in the USofA; Britain used to constantly biitch about it to the US ambassador to GB.

American pols didn't want to offend the source of those funds, namely, the Boston Irish Democratic money (billions of dollars entrenched in US politics for literally centuries), sooooo it was never really 'allowed' to become a campaign issue.

 

Europe’s Elites Seem Determined to Commit Suicide by ‘Diversity’

Politicians say with fury that their migration policies ‘must’ work. What if they don’t?

By
Douglas Murray
June 18, 2017 5:34 p.m. ET

Europe in 2017 is racked with uncertainty—the eurozone crises, the endless challenges of the European Union, national elections that resemble endless rounds of bullet-dodging. Yet even these events are insignificant compared with the deep tectonic shifts beneath the Continent’s politics, shifts that Europeans—and their allies—ignore at our peril.

Throughout the migration crisis of recent years I traveled across the Continent, from the reception islands into which migrants arrive to the suburbs in which they end up and the chancelleries which encouraged them to come. For decades Europe had encouraged guest workers, and then their families, to come. As Germany’s Chancellor Angela Merkel once admitted, nobody expected them to stay.

Yet stay they did, with their numbers swelling even when there were no jobs. Waking up to the results of their policy, European societies rebranded themselves “multicultural” societies, only to begin wondering what that meant. Could a multicultural society make any demands of its newcomers? Or would that be “racist”?

From the 2000s legal and illegal immigration picked up. Boats regularly set out from Turkey and North Africa to enter Europe illegally. Syrians fleeing civil war pushed into the Continent, soon joined by people from across sub-Saharan Africa, North Africa, the Middle East and Far East.

Today the great migration is off the front pages. Yet it goes on. On an average weekend nearly 10,000 people arrive on Italian reception islands alone. Where do they go? What do they expect? And what do we expect of them?

To find the answer to these and other questions it is necessary to ask deeper questions. Why did Europe decide it could take in the poor and dispossessed of the world? Why did we decide that anybody in the world fleeing war, or just seeking a better life, could come to Europe and call it home?

The reasons lie partly in our history, not least in the overwhelming German guilt, which has spread across the Continent and affected even our cultural cousins in America and Australia. Egged on by those who wish us ill, we have fallen for the idea that we are uniquely guilty, uniquely to be punished, and uniquely in need of having our societies changed as a result.

There is also, for Europe, the sense of what I call tiredness—the feeling that the story might have run out: that we have tried religion, all imaginable forms of politics, and that each has, one after another, led us to disaster. When we taint every idea we touch, perhaps a change is as good as a rest.

It is often argued that our societies are old, with a graying population, and so we need immigrants. When these theories are challenged—by asking, for instance, why the next generation of Germany’s workforce might not come from unemployed Greece rather than Eritrea—we are told that we need low-skilled workers who do not speak our languages because it makes Europe more culturally interesting. It is as though some great hole lies at the heart of the culture of Dante, Bach and Wren.

When people point out the downsides of this approach—not least that more immigration from Muslim countries produces many problems, including terrorism—we get the final explanation. It doesn’t matter, we are told: Because of globalization this is inevitable and we can’t stop it anyway.

 

All these instincts, when put together, are the stuff of suicide. They spell out the self-annihilation of a culture as well as a continent. Conversations with European policy makers and politicians have made this abundantly clear to me. They tell me with fury that it “must” work. I suggest that with population change of this kind, at this speed, it may not work at all.

Yet still it is possible that the publics will not go along with the instincts of their leaders. Earlier this year, a poll of European attitudes was published in which citizens of 10 countries were asked a tough question: whether they agreed that there should be no more Muslim migration into their countries. Majorities in eight out of the 10 countries, including France and Germany, said they wanted no more Muslim immigrants.

Over recent decades Europe has made a hasty effort to redefine itself. As the world came in, we became wedded to “diversity.” As terrorism grew and more migrants arrived, public opinion in Europe began to harden. Today “more diversity” remains the cry of the elites, who insist that if the public doesn’t like it yet, it is because they haven’t had enough of it.

The migration policies of the political and other elites of Europe suggest that they are suicidal. The interesting thing to watch in the years ahead will be whether the publics join them in that pact. I wouldn’t bet on it.

 

i think liberal politicians both here and in Europe felt that the imiigrants would assimilate and vote liberal much like old times. its very evident in how obama settled incoming groups into red states, thinking they would dilute that.

 

good point pump

now, off to the gulag for making sense
in the new america, facts are illegal

 

And here ya go.....our 'leadership' in action....

A Terrorist’s Guide to New York City

The left would show jihadists how the cops prevent attacks.


June 18, 2017 6:19 p.m. ET

The New York City Council is the distilled political essence of modern progressivism, which means it can be dangerous to public health and safety. This summer tourists can see more New Yorkers relieving their bladders in public thanks to the council’s reduction in penalties for crimes against public order, and now the council wants to expose the city’s antiterror secrets.

A new bill would require the New York Police Department to disclose and describe all “surveillance technology,” which it defines as “equipment, software, or system capable of, or used or designed for, collecting, retaining, processing, or sharing audio, video, location, thermal, biometric, or similar information.” The cops would have to post this information online annually and respond to public comments.

The effort is backed by such anti-antiterror stalwarts as the New York Civil Liberties Union and the Brennan Center. Manhattan Democrat Daniel Garodnick, a co-sponsor, says the measure would enhance public trust by giving citizens more knowledge about policing techniques.

We’ll see how long that trust lasts if the bill makes it easier for terrorists to thwart or evade the NYPD’s antiterror methods. That’s the legitimate worry of police who rely on technology and surveillance to prevent mass murder. A jihadist bombed Manhattan’s Chelsea neighborhood as recently as September and the department maintains on average three or four active terrorist investigations at any one time. John Miller, the NYPD’s counterterror chief, says police have foiled at least 25 major terror attacks since 9/11.

New York’s cops are as respectful of privacy as any in the country, and they need a court order to conduct searches or track a cellphone. They also comply with the court-ordered Handschu guidelines that impose additional due-process burdens.

An NYPD internal committee reviews these cases along with an external, civilian representative, who is currently former federal Judge Stephen Robinson. As if this weren’t enough, in 2014 the city council established an inspector general for the NYPD. The miracle is that the cops have been able to keep America safe despite all of this bureaucratic oversight and political second-guessing.

New York remains a pre-eminent terror target because of its size and importance as a symbol of American culture and commerce. The recent attacks in Britain show the jihadist threat to open societies hasn’t abated, and democracies need tools to defend themselves without offering terrorists a road map to thwart them.

 

which is why so many non-urbanites voted for Trump. They see the danger in where the Deep State is taking us.

 

Meanwhile, another terrorist attack in Paris after a known Muslim terrorist plows an explosive laden vehicle into a cop car, narrowly missing the convoy.

This is getting fvcking ridiculous.

Anyone else notice how the spelling and grammar check on their iPhone doesn't recognize the words "Muslim" or "terrorist"?

It's like using Google

 

wow yank,never thought we'd agree on the same thing.im sure if I posted this id be called everything but a son of god.

I'm pretty sure I did post something like this before and everyone attacked me.

but yes our intelligence knows whats going on,but they keep it hidden behind closed doors.the amount of evidence is stacked so high its crazy not to believe.

I truly believe if we had not invaded Iraq and left saddam in power,isis would cease to exist.and why did we invade,not because of 9/11 but by false british intelligence.

u have to remember,back in those days the only trouble spot was Afghanistan.iraqi troops,during desert storm and after 911 would seek refuge in Syria.the Syrians would help keep them safe.now Syria is hell on earth.

I'm sure some are going to say oh saddam gassed the kurds,tortured people,yada yada.yes it is true but look at the people that replaced him.id much rather be in a dungeon getting whipped by saddam then being locked inside of a cage and dunked in a pool by isis

 

ISIS will ass-rape you first, ceppy....that's the way those mooslims roll.....the saga of male rape of little boys, for example, in islamist culture runs ong & deep.....wayne gets jealous....

 

google the basra prison incident.

its already been cleaned up lol,but 2 sas soldiers were driving around dressed as arabs shooting at the police and public,then blew up a prison to free some british soldiers.

also look up operation northwoods.its pdf file that the gov declassified on how we were planning to take over cuba by blowing up an American plane while dressed as Cubans to win the support from the American public to invade them.and its so much deeper than that