Trump / FBI / Russians

There is a thin line between news and corruption. Our media crossed that line years ago when a handful of 15 billionaires took control of the press and began using it for propaganda.

As a country that values freedom of the press, we need to take a fresh look at the obligations that the news media has in speaking truth to circumstance and not be allowed to deliberately distort events using speculation and innuendo.

If news agencies want to use commentary, perhaps they should not be allowed to use the word "news" in their program names. At least people would not be fooled into believing they are listening to the news. For example, CNN could change their name to CPN, for Cable Propaganda Network. That would be a far more accurate description of the program.

 

Dennis Prager repeated a version of the following story on his radio broadcast today:

A man went about the community telling malicious lies about the rabbi. Later, he realized the wrong he had done, and began to feel remorse. He went to the rabbi and begged his forgiveness, saying he would do anything he could to make amends. The rabbi told the man, "Take a feather pillow, cut it open, and scatter the feathers to the winds."

The man thought this was a strange request, but it was a simple enough task, and he did it gladly. When he returned to tell the rabbi that he had done it, the rabbi said, "Now, go and gather the feathers. Because you can no more make amends for the damage your words have done than you can recollect the feathers."

 

If Kavanaugh gets rejected, Trump may nominate Amy Barrett. She is probably more conservative.

Democrats will, of course, try to destroy her or whomever Trump nominates. They will criticize her for not having aborted some of her children. But they will mainly slander her as a child abuser. Expect most of the democrat questions to be about her parenting, child discipline, potty training, etc. She will probably admit to (gasp!) spanking them, giving them hand-me-down clothes (the horror), imposing curfews (how Hitler-like), etc.

After the main hearings are complete but just before the committee vote, the democrats will suddenly produce “witnesses” that claim she committed child abuse. There will be no evidence of course, which will be suspicious because for the last several years everyone has always carried a camera (phone). Then the democrats will demand a delay and FBI investigation.

Kavanaugh’s anger will seem quite mild compared to that of a mom accused of child abuse.

 

CNN = Central Negative Network

 

My sources? Well the first article I posted from the NYT which has a picture of the cashiers check from the casino chip scheme. Then I posted a corroborating article from the LA Times from 1991 outlining what the Times reported 27 years later. His daddy got caught by Gaming Enforcement while trying to bail out Trumps failing casino. The facts are all there.

Look, your guy ran on being a self made billionaire and it turns out his daddy made him the man he is and had to bail him out numerous times for his business blunders. I've already said that none of this is leading to an indictment or anything to bring Trump down. Anyone that thanks that is crazy. Just another lie exposed.

Back to the personal attack stuff huh Yank. Not sure why an alternative opinion scares you so much.

 

There is no chance Kavanaugh gets rejected.

 

They're all politicians, they all lie, yet you sound like someone took your teddy bear.

And, I apologize for calling you a sanctimonius jagoff. I was a bit out of line there.

 

On another note:

 

So do you want the swamp drained of lying politicians or is it ok that politicians lie to you? Or it's just ok when Trump lies to you? Just trying to find your logic here.

 

Blah blah blah, Kyle.

I'm a pragmatist. That's my "logic." You seem to be in la la land?

Find me a politician that doesn't lie. Work hard, do your research, & you'll get back to me in a decade.

I didn't 'approve' anything. You have a smarmy habit of throwing words in people's moufs.

 

Blah, blah, blah huh, that seems to be your go to when your argument loses its steam.

I'm missing where I said you "approve" anything. Don't make things up to deflect because your flawed logic has been put on display.

 

Kavanaugh will be in
when the progressive hag Ruther Bader Ginsberg kicks the bucket Amy Barrett will be in

try to unset this cement

 

Amy Barrett....keep dreaming