Trump / FBI / Russians

Archy, it all stems from claiming victim status or racist society holding them back. There are no laws that discriminate against black people from succeeding in life. There are laws that actually give them an advantage and discriminate against whites though. These people will always claim there problems on racism and will make you believe they are the victim. Then, the can't be held accountable for their actions. They can basically shoot someone in the head or rob a store but it's the system. When you place different people into victim groups and they aren't judged by their behaviors or decisions, it sets a dangerous precedence.

If their is institutionalized racism, then how come Asians are the highest paid race in American society. Why isn't their a ASM movement? It's because it boils down to culture and family upbringing. Certain groups of people need to start looking at themselves in the mirror for their failures. Then, these groups will succeed instead of failing. The problem is that the democrats make that hard. They want these people to claim victim status and fail. They want them to need government and not better themselves. In the the end, it results in votes for the democrats. Blacks are just used as pawns by the democratic party for votes and don't even realize they are still on the plantation. Both the MSM and democrats have completely brainwashed several people into believing that democrats actually want to help black people. You also have liberals saying my tax dollars should help people on welfare. They have a superiority complex where they think they are better than blacks and want to act self righteous when making this statement. They don't care about blacks. If they did, they would try to help their community, have honest discussions about the culture in these communities, and help them succeed without government. That will give them more than any handout including self dignity, respect and self worth.

 

[video=youtube;iYGsadcBiFA]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYGsadcBiFA[/video]

 

never forget, LBJ said when trying to pass the major welfare programs 'I'll have those n!ggers voting democrat for 200 years'. Proof that welfare is about buying votes and keeping blacks in the democrat pocket.

 

Bingo. Most liberals want to interpret law around emotions instead of facts. A good example is when Gary decides he should be a woman and gets breasts. He wants to be called Barbara now even though he has a *****. Now, if you still think he is a man and won't call him a woman, they will claim that you are discriminating against him. Forget science and the fact it is biologically a man. The good thing is that if Gary installs a vagina, you can tell him to go **** himself.

 

characterized by dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition, and control of industry and commerce

where did he do any of these things?

 

Lol, I watched that live

 

preaching to the choir my friend

 

EXCELLENT ZIPPY!!
Uncle chang, jackie4chan, jihadijesus, Britiventi, basedleaf, /pol/blart, all awesome characters that came to protest/sh1tpoast irl

he will unite us

 

Why did Trump appoint AG Sessions? Fascism.
He is demonizing a race of people (Latinos). Fascism
He is trying to demonize an entire religion (Mooslims). Fascism.
He is trying to set up a one world government with Russia. Fascism
He is in cahoots with the Alt Right and installed Bannon as his hnic. Fascism.

Walks like a duck. Talks like a duck. Quaaaaaaak Quaaaak!

 

Not all his proposed policies are radical, but radical ideology is within the spectrum of christian influence in the DJT admin. Start with the VP who believes in "Gay Christian Conversion", sounds radical to me, and regardless if this is implemented, it's worrysome that this man has the president's ear. Curious to hear your views on this.

 

or even mention of or even hint at doing those things?
Antifa are nothing but useful idiots and i urge sis gender surf dog look it up that term to realize he's being duped.

 

So explain Lieberman as FBI Director? Doesn't fit your narrative at all

 

This ^ is the historical definition of fascism. It is the definition that most liberals cling to. What the liberals, and many others of any political ilk, forget is that definition has morphed, been modified, changed over our lifetimes. Nowhere is it written that the historical definition of a fascist will always be the strict definition of a fascist.

You may care to recall that Stalin was part & parcel of the international socialist movement & thus firmly on the left. Yet, Stalin defined fascism.

And how would you define the Communist Party in China? Firmly on the left, I think that we would agree on that. And yet that political party has always been as fascist as it can be in its control & treatment of its own population throughout modern human history.

 

You make yourself into an anachronism by staying rooted in one theoretical place your entire life when it comes to politics. Look, for example, at the American political party of anti-Slavery: Republicans under Lincoln. Southern Democrats were some of the most vehemently, and violently, pro-slavery advocates.

Liberals today have doctrinal and emotional roots in twentieth-century European fascism. Many people will be shocked just by the thought that the long discredited right-wing fascism could mutate into the spirit of another age. But it has indeed mutated.

The willful disregard as to how deeply & massively the Obama administration enhanced govt surveillance & controls over the American sheeple is disturbing. Why do sheeple parrot liberal rhetoric, instead of thinking for oneself?

 

"When fascism comes to America, it will not be in brown and black shirts. It will not be with jackboots. It will be Nike sneakers and smiley shirts. Smiley-smiley."

-- George Carlin on Bill Maher’s ‘Real Time’ tv show

 

sounds good.
too bad none of it is true.
all of which can be backed with facts.
you sound like my gay aunt.
are you gay?

 

He is trying to cover his a$$ and is finally getting good advice that he is finally listening to, after being a tool since he took office.

 

so he didnt do anything at all and you are shoehorning your beliefs into the definition.

I think the guy's a prick, but I also think you are clueless. he has done nothing out of the ordinary, no legislation, no actions that marry business and gvt. But Obama sure did (Solandra, etc), but hey, that doesn't fit your narrative

 

Wow

 

I personally think the wall is a non issue, it serves to get people stirred up, however Walls work, just ask the Israelis

if you are against the border wall here, protest Israel too. I double dog dare you, kek