Trump / FBI / Russians

Maybe I missed something but, there is no evidence to support this claim. Last time I checked the DNC still hasn't handed over the server for a thorough investigation. The only evidence is what the DNC has provided. Another thing that smells rotten about this claim is why in the hell would a Russian hacker leave Russian digital fingerprints? C'mon! That's hacker 101 of things not to do.
But I digress.
U.S. brings first charge for meddling in 2018 midterm elections
And it ain't got nothing to do with hacking servers.
first-criminal-case-filed-over-russian-interference-in-2018-midterms-916787
What's good for the goose..........

 

FLASHBACK: ACTING AG SAYS HE WOULD INDICT HILLARY CLINTON
Clinton’s mishandling of classified information a felony offense, says Matthew Whitaker
https://www.infowars.com/flashback-acting-ag-says-he-would-indict-hillary-clinton/

 

Directly from the Mueller indictment:
“4. By in or around April 2016, the conspirators also hacked into the computer networks of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (“D.C.C.C.”) and the Democratic National Committee (“D.N.C.”). The conspirators covertly monitored the computers of dozens of D.C.C.C. and D.N.C. employees, implanted hundreds of files containing malicious computer code (“malware”), and stole emails and other documents from the D.C.C.C. and D.N.C. 5. By in or around April 2016, the conspirators began to plan the release of materials stolen from the Clinton campaign, D.C.C.C. and D.N.C.”

The case you are citing is a foreign agent using money to purchase ad space to “to sow division and discord in the U.S. political system.” Again, not the same as private company deciding what content it wants on its platform.

If you believe there is truly a conspiracy, you should be mad at your republican congressmen for not getting the Secure Elections Act passed with a congressional majority. That bill has been on the docket for a year and keeps getting postponed ...that smells rotten to me.

 

He was playing into the popular narrative then, now that his ass is in the big chair, I highly doubt this ever happens.

 

Kyle! Kyle! KYLE!!!
Stop the F**king STRAWMAN ARGUMENTS!!!!!
JEEZUS F'N CHRYST!!!!!

 

Enough with the bullshit Info Wars crap. Pretty obvious that is what you are really mad about, they censored your boy Alex.

 

Marsh v. Alabama, 326 U.S. 501 (1946), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court, in which it ruled that a state trespassing statute could not be used to prevent the distribution of religious materials on a town's sidewalk, even though the sidewalk was part of a privately owned company town.
Twitter calls itself the "Public Square"
Facebook is also a public platform.
Google is a public service.
The electric company can't deny you service for your political affiliations.
The phone company can't deny you service because they don't like what you talk about.

 

And how does Mueller come to that conclusion?
From what the DNC supplied him.
Not from the actual server itself.
And why oh why haven't the DNC handed over their server?
Hmmm.

 

But they aren't denying anyone service....

 

Now who is deflecting?

 

BWAHAHAHA!!
Good my child. The Deflection is strong with you.
Facebook removes hundreds of US political pages for 'inauthentic ...https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/.../facebook-purge-page-removal-spa...

 

Not deflecting, it was just low hanging fruit with all the Info Wars stuff you post lol

 

Not deflection Kylie.
I digressed after addressing your comment.
So back to the point.
On what evidence did Mueller come to that conclusion if he doesn't have the server for a proper and thorough investigation?
Muller wouldn't lie. Would he?
No. No law enforcement agents lie.
But I digress.

 

Facebook removes hundreds of US political pages for 'inauthentic ...https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/.../facebook-purge-page-removal-spa...

 

That wasn't the point. The point was you are assigning some civic duty to private companies and wanting to indict them for not adhering to those duties.

 

All that Infowars stuff?
One article?
LOL!

 

Seriously, just one huh...

 

The electric company is privately owned.
Your cell phone provider is privately owned.
They can't deny you a public service for your political speech.