You're right. That is why Alex tried to get them thrown out and failed. Would you think that indicates more or less validity to the claim?
And the world's supposed to take the word of an out of context edited video? Well if that's all there is I guess it's true. Your lack of knowledge and wisdom is pitiful brah. You are so blinded by the biased lens you view everything through that you fail to see the Orwellian spell you are under. You'd know what I'm talking about if you ever read 1984. Winston's job was to add and delete information from history. You think that was some dystopian sci-fi shit that had no perception of what the future had in store? Think again brah.
I asked you to admit it. It’s not my responsibility to prove it. Everybody here can see that Archy owned you on that exchange, as well as most other exchanges. His track history trumps yours. Sorry, just how it works.
You asked me to admit I am wrong about something that you can't prove is wrong. Archy hasn't shown anything to refute the video I showed. You just side with him because he knows the infowars website better than I do, your own admission. You guys are so eager to claim victory for each other over every little thing. It's pretty obvious.
Can't stay on point huh, always to the personal stuff. So nothing to prove how out of context that video is? Just have to believe you I guess
Do you know what LAWFARE means? Fukin L mate! Do you know expensive and time consuming a trial is? Just like Blasey Fords claim was valid? Mutha Fuggin Puhleez. Again dimwit. Lawfare. Here you know what i'll provide the definition since you're so thick. Lawfare is a form of war consisting of the use of the legal system against an enemy, such as by damaging or delegitimizing them, tying up their time or winning a public relations victory. You see that last line, thick head? You are another sheep convinced Jones is guilty without the plantiff even providing evidence to support their claim. Brainwashed, skewed perception, sheep.
No. It's called LAWFARE. It's expensive and time consuming. Again you are no different than all the bitches crying #MeToo if you go by that thought process.
You have no proof of this besides your opinion. So now the parents aren't suing because of what he said but because they are engaging in Lawfare to bring Alex Jones down? Ahhh there is the old Archy I used to know.
It’s called credibility, you lose that when you’re constantly proven wrong time and again. And you lose credibility when you make things up that aren’t true, like scrubbing a website of videos that were never there to begin with. Archy clearly knew the rest of the video. He knows the guy’s website and he clearly is more educated on the subject than you. I believe him because he has more credibility than you do. It’s OK to admit when you’re wrong. You actually would gain some credibility and respect doing that.
The videos were there, you could search and find them. But now they are unavailable, scrubbed by Youtube and FB. Again see below: https://www.infowars.com/live-alex-jones-responds-to-sandy-hook-vampire/ It's ok to admit when you are wrong DP.
You think that's the only Sandy Hook lawsuit? There's like 10 dude. He's won or had dismissed nearly all of them last I heard. You think the parent's are forking over the dough to sue Jones? And what proof do you have? NONE. So STFU already.
This is the part where you made shit up and now are trying to weasel your way out if it. YouTube deleted it. But when you add that HE SCRUBBED HIS SITE BECAUSE OF THOSE LAWSUITS, you’re just making it up! Arch called you on it, now say sorry!
Wait... are you saying that Jones didn’t say that Sandy Hook, Orlando and Charlottesville were “false flags”
Dude all I did was ask you why you thought he toned it down this year. You started this argument. I have not read about any getting dismissed. I have read one judge is considering it in the Charlottesville suit which is frivilous. But not in the Sandy Hook stuff. You'll have to show me that.
Yeah. Scrubbed by YT and FB. Which leads me back to the quote: “When you tear out a man's tongue, you are not proving him a liar, you're only telling the world that you fear what he might say.” You fail took see the wisdom in that quote. You fail at logic, reason, and objectivity too.
That is another argument entirely. But in this case you can't back up the things you claim, that's the bottom line. Until I see proof otherwise you can't convince me that video is just playing "devil's advocate". So I guess the answer I was looking for all along is that you don't think he has toned it down at all?
Have you guys searched Joe Rogan’s podcast? I’m pretty sure he has debated this with Rogan before. They are friends but get into it on this stuff. I believe I recall seeing an episode where they talked about Sandy Hook.